Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No. It's a public (council maintained) road with some houses in it.   Some other houses back onto it too and those owners have right of way down the road to access the back of their properties.  Theres a few garages with private osp - so one drives out the garage, over the osp, and onto the public side road and then out on to the public main road.  Irrespective of whether the garages are used - the local businesses parking their cars on the private osp are ostensibly preventing cars from accessing the public roads.
    • is the side street solely for access to your garages? who owns the land and thus the road? dx  
    • A local business has been parking on an off-street parking space in front of my garages (in a side street).  I wasn't using them for a while so didnt bother to do anything.  But now a second local business is also using the osp - taking it in turns with the 1st biz.  This has started to nark me.    The employees choose to drive to work.  There is no private parking in their business's street.  But there are some underground secure garages in their street - which cost apx £2.4k/y to rent - which works out apx £6.60/d. (I believe one of the biz owners already rent one for storage purposes).  If the employee had to park on a meter it would cost them £6.60/h - £66 for 10h and have to move every 4h.  They just don't want to pay for parking. I haven't confronted either of them.  Instead I just put 2 clear "no parking" signs in front of the garages. And a note on one of the cars specifically saying that as they don't live or rent in the street and it's private land could they stop parking.   They ignored that.  And just put notes on their dash with a # to call if one needs the car moved.  There is a sign and they've been told in writing to stop parking. And they are just ignoring it.    I don't what a confrontation.    I don't want to go to the expense of bollards (other than maybe traffic plastic ones - but they'll probs just move them).  Council won't do zilch cos it's private land. And police won't get involved - unless I clamp/ tow the cars and then they'd be after me, not the drivers!    What's the best thing to do?
    • yes might be the best idea. you'd only at best get 8% flat interest and that unusual on a GOGW if this was what it was. simply contact the FOS and let them know its resolved. dx  
    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5252 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I had a bailiff from Rossendales call a few months ago regarding unpaid council Tax.

 

I let him in and agreed that the bill needed paying but didnt have the £1600.00 he was asking for. I gave him £300 and he said i would have a payment schedule set up for me and left.

 

2 weeks later I had another guy at the door from rosendales asking to speak to me. He said he was here to collect the outstanding balance of £1500.00.

 

I told him I did not have it and he said I had 48hrs to get the money or he would be back to remove my goods. he took down the reg of my car without saying anything and left.

 

I then rang my local council and paid the ammount in full as I didnt want these people back at my door. I told the council that i felt threaterned and intimidated by this 2nd bailiff.

 

I was then told I had been charged £202.00 for this visit which included an attaedance fee, a van fee and a levy fee (no levy was done on either visits) I wrote to Rossendales and advised them that as far as I was aware you cannot charge a van fee to uplift good if they have not been levied upon first and no levy was ever done.

 

They wrote back inlcuding a levy which was totally wrong and unsigned , The bailiff had a had a quick look about in my room which i use as an office and included my computer which i use for work and a tv which he stated was a 50" plasma, I dont own a 50" plasma, and a large digital printer which he totally got the name wrong (the name that he put down does not existing in the printing world !) along with my car which is work £26k.

 

He claims I refused to sign the levy or walking possession agreement so as not to incur the £12 charge.

 

I have written to them 3 times now and have recived a letter from the complaints team leader saying the she has interviewed the bailiff and he is adament that these items were in my house when he attended and he did hand me a copy of the levy.

 

This guy has baltently lied and I have explained to them that he has levied on things which dont exist.

 

Its a point of order now that i get this £200 back from them,

 

Should I issue proceedings against them ?

 

Any and all help would be really appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Its a point of order now that i get this £200 back from them,

 

Should I issue proceedings against them ?

 

Any and all help would be really appreciated

 

I assume you therefore paid the extra charges. To proceed further you need to ask them for a statement of your account including screenshot - this will detail all visits, charges, when they are and at what time they were applied. As a tactic they may ask for £10 but thie info you are asking for does not come under Data Protection so does not need to be paid - they are obliged to give you this information.

 

When you get it go through it with a fine tooth comb - by all means come back and ask questions. If you find you have been overcharged write to them give them 7 days to repy and if nothing received issue N1 in the County Court for your money back. If this was for Council Tax you should also write the same to the Council but point out to them if they fail to reimburse you you will also name them as co-defendant in any action.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Yes I paid the extra charges.

 

I already have a list of charges but I thought they could not charge a van fee if they had not done a levy of distress.

 

I have written to them telling them they have overcharged me and I want my money back plus the bailiff lied about doing the levy in the first place.

 

They say their fees are charged in accourdance with the council tax (Administration and Enforcement) regulations 1992 as ammended and I am due nothing back.

 

This cannot be right, the guy has made up a levy which is both wrong and unsigned. This cannot be right, How can I prove to rossendales that he has got it totally wrong because he was going off memory and has fabricated the levy once questioned ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They wrote back including a levy which was totally wrong and unsigned , The bailiff had a had a quick look about in my room which i use as an office and included my computer which i use for work and a TV which he stated was a 50" plasma, I don't own a 50" plasma, and a large digital printer which he totally got the name wrong (the name that he put down does not existing in the printing world !) along with my car which is worth £26k.

 

this would be classed as an excessive levy

as the car would have covered all the council tax debt and bailiffs fees there was no reason for him add the TV computer and printer

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...