Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dlc & Mbna Help Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5228 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Today I received a letter from Direct Legal & Collections. As follows ;

 

We hereby give you notice that this debt has been assigned to Hillesden Securities LTD, trading as direct legal & collecions (dlc).

 

This means that MBNA no longer own your account and your account is now owned by dlc. All future payments and contact must be made with us.

 

We will start reporting against you credit file within 30 days of you receiving this letter.

 

You must let us have your proposalsof the payment of the outstanding balance by calling 0844 3358498 or by returning the attached insertion today.

 

Failure to respond to this letter may result in legal action.

 

Please someone advice me, who are these guys, do they mean business.

 

are they allowed to have the debt assigned to them, yet I have not even had a default notice served.

 

PLEASE HELP ???:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are debt collecters and yes they can buy debts often for a fraction of what you owe.

 

Legal Action is a long way off yet as they have to follow pre-litigation proceedures and go though all the hoops first.

 

As you have not had a default notice served you are already one up on them as MBNA should have served a Default Notice before taking any action.

 

The first thing for you to do is to send off a CCA Request to DL&C with £1 as that is the fee payable to get a copy and see what comes up my guess is that MBNA do not have an agreement hence why they were quick to sell it off.

 

Anymore questions just post back and someone with the knowledge will be back.

 

Regards

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the CCA letter template just copy and paste then edit to suit your needs:

 

http://http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The cca request letter is below. Remember do NOT sign it and always send it by recorded deliver. Keep the receipt and all other paperwork safe.

 

Hope this helps.

Cheers.

UF

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

OR ANY COMPANY YOU PURPORT TO REPRESENT

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

Re:- Account/Reference Number 4563210025897412

 

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

__________________

I am a first year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. If you are in doubt, always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

  • Haha 1

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers UF you beat me to it lol

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha looks like you got in just before me lol. Anyone would think we were London Busses ;)

 

Cheers :)

UF

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UF,

 

No problem at least one of us got there anyway I've clicked your scales for being so quick well done.

 

PF

  • Haha 1

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks For The Letter

 

I Have Had A Look At My Records,

I Sent Mbna A Letter In September Same As Above Asking For The Contract Along With £1 Postal Order.

 

They Never Replied, Instead Just Rang Me Asking To Make Payments, Even A Settlement.

 

I Then Wrote A Letter Stating If I Dont Receive The Contract In 12+2 Days The Account Will Be In Dispute.

 

They Have Had These Letters, As I Sent Them Recorded Delivery, Which I Have Records Of.

 

As It Stands This Account Is In Dispute.

 

December 18th Got A Letter From Mbna Stating The Account Is Sold To Direct Legal-dtl.

 

Dlc Have Been Calling Me And Writing To Me, Yet Mbna Sent Me A Letter On 29 December Stating The Debt Still Stands And I Am Not Allowed To Assign The Debt To Any Other Company.

 

What I Dont Understand, Is If They Have Sold It Why Is Mbna Still Writing To Me Telling Me What I Can And Can't Do.

 

I Also Got A Letter From Dlc Today Telling Me They Have Checked With Land Registery, And Know That I Own A House. Stating They Are Going To Apply For County Court Judgement.

 

Is This Debt Really Sold To Dlc Or Are They Just Trying It On?

 

As Previously I Offered To Settle The Debt For 30% And They Refused.

Can It Be Possible If A Debt Agency Would Offer More Than That, Yet I Thought They Only Get No More Than 10%?

 

Need Help What Should I Do.

 

Shall I Send Them A Copy Of Those Letters?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case, don't bother communicating with them any more. Instead make a complaint to Trading Standards, and copy it to the OFT, that they are chasing an alleged debt while it is in dispute, which is not allowed. That often makes them go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case, don't bother communicating with them any more. Instead make a complaint to Trading Standards, and copy it to the OFT, that they are chasing an alleged debt while it is in dispute, which is not allowed. That often makes them go away.

 

SORRY BUT CAN YOU ADVICE ME WHAT AND HOW SHOULD I DO IT.

DO I WRITE TO THEM IF SO WHAT DO I SAY AND DO I NEED TO SEND ANY PROOF ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are debt collecters and yes they can buy debts often for a fraction of what you owe.

 

Legal Action is a long way off yet as they have to follow pre-litigation proceedures and go though all the hoops first.

 

As you have not had a default notice served you are already one up on them as MBNA should have served a Default Notice before taking any action.

 

The first thing for you to do is to send off a CCA Request to DL&C with £1 as that is the fee payable to get a copy and see what comes up my guess is that MBNA do not have an agreement hence why they were quick to sell it off.

 

Anymore questions just post back and someone with the knowledge will be back.

 

Regards

 

PF

 

 

Thanks For The Letter

 

I Have Had A Look At My Records,

I Sent Mbna A Letter In September Same As Above Asking For The Contract Along With £1 Postal Order.

 

They Never Replied, Instead Just Rang Me Asking To Make Payments, Even A Settlement.

 

I Then Wrote A Letter Stating If I Dont Receive The Contract In 12+2 Days The Account Will Be In Dispute.

 

They Have Had These Letters, As I Sent Them Recorded Delivery, Which I Have Records Of.

 

As It Stands This Account Is In Dispute.

 

December 18th Got A Letter From Mbna Stating The Account Is Sold To Direct Legal-dtl.

 

Dlc Have Been Calling Me And Writing To Me, Yet Mbna Sent Me A Letter On 29 December Stating The Debt Still Stands And I Am Not Allowed To Assign The Debt To Any Other Company.

 

What I Dont Understand, Is If They Have Sold It Why Is Mbna Still Writing To Me Telling Me What I Can And Can't Do.

 

I Also Got A Letter From Dlc Today Telling Me They Have Checked With Land Registery, And Know That I Own A House. Stating They Are Going To Apply For County Court Judgement.

 

Is This Debt Really Sold To Dlc Or Are They Just Trying It On?

 

As Previously I Offered To Settle The Debt For 30% And They Refused.

Can It Be Possible If A Debt Agency Would Offer More Than That, Yet I Thought They Only Get No More Than 10%?

 

Need Help What Should I Do.

 

Shall I Send Them A Copy Of Those Letters?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Yousef,

 

Right If they have sold the debt to dlc you should have received a notice of assignment. So I would start by writting to dlc asking for proof that they have brought the debt.

 

While you are at it you can also state that they have no right in acting on the debt as it is in dispute due to mbna's failure to supply a copy of the CCA.

 

Include copies of the letters you have sent to mbna as well as a photocopy of the postal receipt.

 

That should get them off your back.

 

the letter from mbna should be headed "Notice of Assignment" only this will prove that the debt is sold nothing else will do.

 

Next write to MBNA telling them hat they are still in default of your request and it will remain in default until a copy of the CCA which you have paid for is forwarded.

 

You can also write to the Information Commissioner asking them to intervene due to mbna being in default of a valid and legit request.

 

Regards

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Yousef,

 

Right If they have sold the debt to dlc you should have received a notice of assignment. So I would start by writting to dlc asking for proof that they have brought the debt.

 

While you are at it you can also state that they have no right in acting on the debt as it is in dispute due to mbna's failure to supply a copy of the CCA.

 

Include copies of the letters you have sent to mbna as well as a photocopy of the postal receipt.

 

That should get them off your back.

 

the letter from mbna should be headed "Notice of Assignment" only this will prove that the debt is sold nothing else will do.

 

Next write to MBNA telling them hat they are still in default of your request and it will remain in default until a copy of the CCA which you have paid for is forwarded.

 

You can also write to the Information Commissioner asking them to intervene due to mbna being in default of a valid and legit request.

 

Regards

 

PF

 

 

I got a letter from mbna dated 18th December as follows:

 

Your outstanding balance due under the above account has been sold to Direct Legat-Dtl.

 

Direct Legals-Dtl's address is :

 

Buckingham Road

xxxxx

xxxx

xxx

 

All enquiries regarding this account, including accurate balance information, together with future payments, should be made directly to this company.

 

Yours sincerely.

 

 

Thats all they have sent. what do you think ?

 

ps whats Information Commissioner

Edited by yousef1973
Information Commissioner
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry forget the information commisioner.

 

As that office is for complaints with the Data Protection Act.

 

You complaint should be forwarded to the OFT.

 

The Office of Fair Trading: making markets work well for consumers

 

Ok MBNA have informed you that the debt has been sold to DL&C so that appears ok.

 

But it still should not have been sold while in dispute.

 

Have MBNA sent you a Default Notice ?

 

You can now request the CCA from DL&C as they are the owners of the debt.

 

So sent a letter to DL&C asking why they brought a debt from mbna that was in dispute due to failure in supplying a copy of the CCA.

 

This is the template to use just edit to suit your needs:

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Date:

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Account number: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated XXXXX

 

This account is in dispute with **original creditor/DCA** and has been since DATE .

Not only is this a breach of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 in line with the Office Of Fair Trading's debt collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998

 

My previous dispute from **DATE** has NOT been answered.

 

As **original creditor/name of debt collection agency** are now in default of my Consumer Credit Act agreementrequest and have also breached *s10 Data Protection Act request , I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the **original creditor/DCA** for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as **New DCA** cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

If **New DCA** chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 in line with the Office Of Fair Tradings Collection Guidelines

 

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry forget the information commisioner.

 

As that office is for complaints with the Data Protection Act.

 

You complaint should be forwarded to the OFT.

 

The Office of Fair Trading: making markets work well for consumers

 

Ok MBNA have informed you that the debt has been sold to DL&C so that appears ok.

 

But it still should not have been sold while in dispute.

 

Have MBNA sent you a Default Notice ?

 

You can now request the CCA from DL&C as they are the owners of the debt.

 

So sent a letter to DL&C asking why they brought a debt from mbna that was in dispute due to failure in supplying a copy of the CCA.

 

This is the template to use just edit to suit your needs:

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Date:

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Account number: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated XXXXX

 

This account is in dispute with **original creditor/DCA** and has been since DATE .

Not only is this a breach of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 in line with the Office Of Fair Trading's debt collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998

 

My previous dispute from **DATE** has NOT been answered.

 

As **original creditor/name of debt collection agency** are now in default of my Consumer Credit Act agreementrequest and have also breached *s10 Data Protection Act request , I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the **original creditor/DCA** for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as **New DCA** cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

If **New DCA** chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 in line with the Office Of Fair Tradings Collection Guidelines

 

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

Does it matter the way the letter is headed from mbna

the letter from mbna should be headed "Notice of Assignment" only this will prove that the debt is sold nothing else will do.

 

no heading with notice of assignment

 

just telling me, sold the debt.

 

ps, as far as i can remember no default notice has been served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as an assignment notice is an official document yes it should be headed but hey mbna are well known 4 getting things wrong and in the wrong order

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sending the following letter to them, does this look ok ?

 

DLC

BUCKINGHAM ROAD

BRACKLEY

NORTHAMPTONSHIRE

NN13 7DN

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxx

xxxxxx

 

YOUR CLIENT : MBNA 11 JANUARY 2010

DLC REF xxxxxxxxxx

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Account number: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Thank you for your letter dated 29th December 2009, informing me that MBNA has assigned the debt to Hillesden Securities Ltd, trading as DLC.

 

Can you send me written evidence, showing me that the debt has been purchased by you, as I have not had any information from MBNA telling me that.

 

If you have legally purchased this debt, then you have no right in acting on a debt as it is in dispute due to MBNA’s failure to supply a copy of a proper executed CCA.

 

This account is in dispute with MBNA and has been since 16 September 2009.

Not only is this a breach of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 in line with the Office Of Fair Trading's debt collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998

 

My previous dispute from 16th January 2009 has NOT been answered.

 

As MBNA are now in default of my Consumer Credit Act agreement request and have also breached *s10 Data Protection Act request , I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the MBNA for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as MBNA cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

 

If MBNA chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 in line with the Office Of Fair Tradings Collection Guidelines

 

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

Ps, account dispute letter enclosed with proof of delivery.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks fine to me perhaps other caggers here could also confirm

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a similar thing. I had an arrangement with MBNA "for the forseeable future" and kept to it. Then all of a sudden I get a letter stating that the debt has been sold to DLC.

 

So letters start arriving sayingthe debt has been assigned to DLC and all the usual rubbish. I'm called 3 times and texted once.

 

So I respond with the CCA letter and also send them the harrasment letter.

 

They have finally responded that they have requested the CCA from MBNA and some other pooh.

 

Now this is the issue I have which might also apply in this case. As they have sold the debt then is not the contract between myself and MBNA terminated.

 

Secondly, if MBNA divulge any CCA to DLC does this not breach data protection in that they are now divulging info after they have voluntarily terminated the contract?

 

They then go on to state that if they are unable to forward a copy of the original agreement they will be able to supply a true copy which will comply with section 77-79 of the CCA 1974.

 

So what do you peeps think as I reckon this is identical to what the OP is going through?

 

I'll repost if need be so as not to hi jack the OP's question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sending the following letter to them, does this look ok ?

 

DLC

BUCKINGHAM ROAD

BRACKLEY

NORTHAMPTONSHIRE

NN13 7DN

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxx

xxxxxx

 

YOUR CLIENT : MBNA 11 JANUARY 2010

DLC REF xxxxxxxxxx

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Account number: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Thank you for your letter dated 29th December 2009, informing me that MBNA has assigned the debt to Hillesden Securities Ltd, trading as DLC.

 

Please send me written evidence, showing me that the debt has been purchased by your company.

 

This account is in dispute with MBNA and has been since 16 September 2009.

Your companies behaviour is a breach of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 in line with the Office Of Fair Trading's debt collection guidelines, and also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998

 

My previous dispute from 16th January 2009 has NOT been answered.

 

As MBNA are now in default of my Consumer Credit Act agreement request and have also breached *s10 Data Protection Act request , I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted and under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the MBNA for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as MBNA cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

If MBNA chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 in line with the Office Of Fair Tradings Collection Guidelines

 

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I enclose the aforementioned account dispute letter with proof of delivery to MNBA.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

Some changes for you to consider. I would leave in the bits in red since they form the basis of your complaint.

Do NOT be too pleasant in your dealings with them. As they choose to deal with us, Joe Public, in a derisory manner, it is only fair to treat them with the same contempt!

 

I would also enclose the telephone & doorstep letters at this stage purely so that they can see you mean business. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

folks

 

I phoned FOS regarding similar letters from these clowns and they are well known to FOS. They took all the details over the phone, acknowledged that the content of the letter was tantamount to threats and will take it up with DLC. THEY EVEN RANG ME BACK TO SAVE MY PHONE BILL! They also stated that any repayment agreement had to be what was affordable to me and not what the DCA wanted!

 

Inieterestingly i have also been informed that logging such a complaint helps should these characters every get to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RIGHT FINALLY GOT A REPLY TODAY, OBVIOUSLY NOT BY DLC BUT BY A COPMANY CALLED APLINS==aplin stockton farfax solicitors.

 

Basically they have totally ignore the above letter i sent.

 

The letter as follows:

 

Dear Sir / Madam

 

We have been instructed by direct legal & collections on behalf of Hillesden Securities LTD to take necessary steps to recover the outstanding balance as shown above.

 

Our client ask that you contact them either direct by telephone on 0844 3358498 or by writing to them at direct legal & collections, Buckingham Road xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. If you do not make full payment or reach agreement with direct legal & collections within 7 days, legal proceedings may be commenced without further notice.

 

In the event of a judgement being obtained, we shall seek all fixed costs and fees which will be added to the outstanding debt.

 

Yours sincerely.

 

I have had a look the address it is a po box in oxon, yet when i look at back of the envelope return address states, please return to

DLC

po box 4777

rugby

 

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE ADVICE, WHAT TO DO NEXT AS THEY HAVE TOTALLY IGNORED MY REQUEST AND ALSO WHO ARE THESE SOLICITORS APLINS.

 

 

Any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...