Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UK CPS Ltd Parking Ticket charge - Leeds road retail park, Huddersfield


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5264 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

I've just spent the last hour reading through the forums which is a result of me having received my first ever parking fine within the past week from: "UK CPS Ltd".

 

The car park i believe was a private car park (not sure what implications this has if it was private or council land?). The charge is for £60 and i was just about to pay it online before i came accross these forums.

 

Having read many threads the general consensus on here seems to be either to ignore it totally (and the subsequent threatening letters) or to ignore the ticket but to reply to any letters they send basically asking them to provide evidence of the "driver" of the vehicle. Obviously i am the registered keeper but there are so many different drivers i dont keep a record of who and at what times your honour.

 

What would your advice be? I have read alot of threads but not sure if the ignore approach is still current. From UK CPS Ltd address i see they are hidden away behind a PO Box in Huddersfield which isn't far from me (I work in Huddersfield).

 

Any advice or recommendations you can offer would be much appreciated. I would sooner give this money to charity than UK CPS Ltd.

 

Obviously they seem to play on the fear of "what if they take me to court", it's as bad as insurance, no better than a tax on fear.

 

Regards

 

Matt :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok xmas pressie for you ITS NOT A FINE

 

its an INVOICE and a mail [problem]

 

firstly if you was not driving you have no legal obligation to tell them who was

 

take you to court , more chance of winning the lottery

 

have a read of the many posts regarding these clowns / [problematic]

 

3 golden rules

 

1) IGNORE

 

2) IGNORE

 

3) GOTO 1

 

YES you may receive posts from them claiming they "may" or "could" do all sorts of things with the cleaner sending a letter claiming to be a DCA the tea boy claiming to be a solicitor, they all sit on desks next to each other , yes on the desks they done have the brains to work out what a chair is for yet

 

and their MD is the person who's sole job is changing the letter heads in the printer depending who is sending the letter

 

forget them and enjoy xmas

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely no contact with them whatsoever is the only sensible solution.

Don't even be tempted to send them the "I am the owner, not the driver" letter as that will give them hope that you think they are a legitamate company rather than the [problem]-masters that they really are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Matty25 i had 3 of these parking invoices in less than 2 weeks back in june when i used to park in Maplins electronics car park in leeds,the reason for getting the tickets was due to parking longer than 2 hours. i ignored them all iv heard nothing since.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely no contact with them whatsoever is the only sensible solution.

Don't even be tempted to send them the "I am the owner, not the driver" letter as that will give them hope that you think they are a legitamate company rather than the [problem]-masters that they really are.

 

 

Ar recon they aint [problem] masters cos wiv erd that tha dunt pay these ticits cos thes nowt but bits on paper that we all av a gud laf at, afore we flush em darn drain to join rest on't **** at sewige plant .

Edited by Mr lex
Removing offensive word....... Mr Lex
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,Have also received one of those stupid parking tickets, Dated 2/12/09 landed on doormat on 24/12/09. The funny thing about it is, the said offense was at Bramhill Shopping Centre Stockport, well the person who was driving the car at the time was over 130 miles away on the East coast, and has never been to Stockport???

They want £90.00 plus £3 per day.

I phoned them, and they said, no the offense was in Scarborough, so as far as i am concerned they have made one very big mistake, if they want to take it further, let them.:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I phoned them, and they said, no the offense was in Scarborough, so as far as i am concerned they have made one very big mistake, if they want to take it further, let them.:-D

 

I hope that is the one and only time you are going to have any communication with them pandaman. If they think you are taking them seriously by talking to them, then they will keep you at the top of their "must harrass more" list.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is your phone " number with held? "

Cos if it aint you have given them the key to your front room.

In my view, you made a mistake by even thinking of giving these comics any standing.

My own phone is Ex dir, and number with held, and we do not get an itemised bill.

Therefore wot cant speak cannot lie.

My mobile has an ASDA SIM, an I use about £3 on phone calls every 6 weeks or so

If you want to give them a number to dial, give them a number of call box up a country lane.

As said in WW2 " Careless talk cots lives. "

 

Motto should be " Least said soonest mended."

 

Av a nice Xmas

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,

 

so have there been any court cases yet with UK CPS Ltd?

 

what are the chances of them taking me to court?

 

shall i 1) ignore totally, or 2) ignore ticket but reply to first letter. The only reason i am keen to reply to first letter is to at least respond so that if it does get to court it looks like ive been trying to help as much as i can.

 

Regards

 

 

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

When dealing with these car parkin wallers remember this Police short caution from

Wath on Dearne.

Thas not got to say nowt, an if tha does al tel judge. Circa 1972.

 

( Once had the biggest shunting yard in Europe, now a nature reserve.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget it and enjoy xmas, its an un-enforcible invoice , end of story, it could say you was parked on the Moon , will not make any difference

 

thanks kiptower, its just my luck that i'm the one they take to court lol. sure people on here would help me produce a glowing defence though?

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to UK CPS Ltd Parking Ticket charge - Leeds road retail park, Huddersfield
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...