Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax and dishonest housemates - small claims court?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5282 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone and seasons greetings!!

 

I'm hoping you all can help me with this, on behalf of my boyfriend who was in a really terrible house situation earlier this year.

 

I won't bore you with too much of the details in context, but he lived with what he thought were 3 good friends, however for various reasons they fell out shortly after/during moving into their new house around about March 2009.

 

Two were students but had to drop out of uni because they were using student loans to pay their rent and not their fees, thus they were technically not liable for council tax. I am not sure if the council has updated their records to reflect this. My boyfriend and the other housemate were the only ones liable for council tax on record, although at the time they were all supposed to be splitting it equally amongst them.

 

After an intense few months (July 2009 I think), he had to move out because - without getting too personal - they are completely inhuman, irrational and pretty much psychotic!!

 

The £500 deposit he paid for the house itself was not given back to him, because they all ganged up and said that he owed it to them for bills. So, the girl who replaced him did not pay him the deposit and the agency didn't have to return it either because it was a joint tenancy. The kind hearted (too kind sometimes) guy that he is, he said fine, as long as it got him out of the house.

 

6 months later and it's obvious that once again they used his money not for bills, but to fuel their ridiculous unemployed, takeaway and drugged up lifestyle, as they managed to get his new address so that a council tax bill of £800 could be sent to him.

 

I'm not sure of the details such as the date of the bill, but it was for £600, and had £200 added as a late charge. Apparently it has been taken to court twice, although this is the first he has heard of it because he was not made aware of the letters in the first place. The bill has his name and the third (non student) housemate's name on it.

 

How on earth does he get out of this mess?? It isn't his bill to pay in the first place, but how do you prove it? Someone suggested that a small step in this would be to remove the £200 surplus, because he wasn't told about the bill initially, thus it is unfair to add a late charge. He is talking about going to small claims court, but who knows what this would involve?

 

I doubt this has any legal standing, but they did all force him to sign a silly 'contract' stating what the £500 would be used for, and it details the bills that they were supposed to pay with it. I'm pretty sure it said council tax on it and all four housemates signed this.

 

Would really appreciate your advice on this one, these vindictive girls caused a lot of personal problems for him and more than anything I want to see him move on and leave that messy past behind! :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't his bill to pay in the first place, but how do you prove it?

 

Can you clarify exactly what you mean by this - is the bill for dates when he was there, or not? If the bill covers a period when he was living there, then clearly he is liable. If he's given his housemates money which was supposed to be paid for council tax and they've spent it on something else then that is a seperate issue - the key thing here is that unless he has paid the council tax directly to the council, then as far as they are concerned he is still liable for this. He needs to contact them immediately to discuss this, as ultimately if he doesn't pay the consequences could be quite serious, it could even go as far as imprisonment for not paying council tax (although this would be an extreme measure).

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In hindsight he should have obtained a receipt showing that the money was to be used for paying utilities including council tax.

If there is a proof of a deposit receipt maybe the OP should consider a small claims against the former housemates.

Unfortunately we got caught by a landlord many years ago who kept our deposit on the flimsest of excuses and at the time we had no recourse. In the eighties £250 was a lot of money to loose!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you clarify exactly what you mean by this - is the bill for dates when he was there, or not? If the bill covers a period when he was living there, then clearly he is liable. If he's given his housemates money which was supposed to be paid for council tax and they've spent it on something else then that is a seperate issue - the key thing here is that unless he has paid the council tax directly to the council, then as far as they are concerned he is still liable for this. He needs to contact them immediately to discuss this, as ultimately if he doesn't pay the consequences could be quite serious, it could even go as far as imprisonment for not paying council tax (although this would be an extreme measure).

 

Thanks for your input.

 

As far as I know, the bill is for the dates he was living there. You are right, he is liable because his name is on the bill. The issue is that the housemates used his money for themselves and not the bill. He did contact the council and they basically said as far as their concerned he lived there and he needs to pay it.

 

It's not looking too good is it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In hindsight he should have obtained a receipt showing that the money was to be used for paying utilities including council tax.

If there is a proof of a deposit receipt maybe the OP should consider a small claims against the former housemates.

Unfortunately we got caught by a landlord many years ago who kept our deposit on the flimsest of excuses and at the time we had no recourse. In the eighties £250 was a lot of money to loose!

 

Thanks for the advice.

 

So if there is a proof of deposit receipt, even though it is a joint tenancy, he'd have a chance of getting it back? As the agency at the time said it was for them to discuss amongst themselves, as long as the agency received the correct amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...