Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

capQuest


akuma
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4575 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

In May 2001 I originally took a loan out with Sainsburys Bank.

After losing my job and in difficullty paying back the monthly payments my loan was transfered to Blair Oliver Scott. Since then I was paying back until I moved recently. I didnt tell them where I moved but I assume my landlord told them I no longer lived there.

Now capquest just sent me a letter that I need to pay back £3000 otherwise they start legal action.

Now I need to know what my options are. Should I ignore capquest letter?

 

Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 2 weeks later...

I sent the CCA request letter and I received this letter from capQuest

 

"Further to recent contact with our office and your request for further information in relation to the above account, we would confirm that your account is now on hold for 28 days whilst we obtain the information required.

 

If you have any proof of payments or correspondence that would assist with your query please forward these documents to our Collections Administartion department."

 

So whats the next step they would do and how should do I react?

 

thanks

Edited by akuma
thanks
Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont need to do anything and you should certainly never send them information that would help them. So dont do anything until they send you a copy of the CCA, bear in mind after 12+2days from the date of your CCA request they will be in default and can not pursue you or enforce the debt till they do produce the CCA.

 

once you have the CCA post it up on here and we can tell you if its valid or not and what your next step should be, until then, just sit back and relax.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

I just received this letter this morning;

Further to your recent correspondence.

 

A letter telling me ways I could pay and also a photocopy of the original Credit Agreement between me and my Sainsburys bank.

The agreement is signed and dated by me on the 5/5/2001

 

I need to reply within couple of days otherwise they will pass on my account to their collection department.

 

 

What are my next options?

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Added jpgs of scanned letters and agreement.

 

If I ignore these letters from CapQuest can they legally come down to my house with baliffs? Or would they take me to court first?

20100122092952_00001.pdf

20100122092952_00002.pdf

20100122092952_00003.pdf

Edited by akuma
Link to post
Share on other sites

akuma, I am having a problem opening your third attachment.

 

It is court first, then bailiffs.

 

Since their first letter says they have purchased the debt I would have thought you should have received a Notice of Assigment. However I am not certain, and would look for clarification from more experienced people. A NoA would confirm that they are entitled to receive the monies (if people think your agreement is enforceable, and I can't see anything wrong with it).

 

If they have genuinely purchased the debt, and people think the agreement is enforceable please be aware they will probably have purchased this for between 10%-20% of the value of the debt. If you have funds available then bear this in mind as you make an offer for full and final settlement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not phone Capquest.....ever! Any correspondence should be written and sent recorded delivery...although from personal experience that doesn't mean they will read or respond to it, but it does mean you have a paper trail for reference. If you phone them they will tell you anything but probably won't honour what they say....so they could agree over the telephone to accept a settlement figure...you pay it...then they will chase you for the remainder. Get everything in writing.

 

If you do set up a payment agreement with them, do not use direct debit, set up a standing order, that way you stay in control of the amount...and keep your payment agreement letter safe.

 

I suggest hanging on until someone more knowledgable takes a look at your agreement.

 

All the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are ways to do F&F Offers it is important that they are done properly preferably through a third party which can be a relative, Also I believe all offers should be done with the heading (Without Prejudice) on any offer letter you might send.

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt companys buy debt for between 10 and 20% of their value so your alleged debt was probably bought for a maximum of £600 so if you offered £800 they would still make an easy profit, but you have to be careful and get all in writing because they could take your 800 and then sell the remaining 2200 to some other DCA or continue chasing them selves that is why it is important to do everything in writing so you have proof

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Akuma, yes I have personal experience of Crapquest, I've been paying a token payment to them for over 3 years (amount agreed by them as per their agreement letter). They have constantly sent me threatograms saying I'm not paying/ignoring their letters. They have ignored all my letters to them including a letter of formal complaint and a CCA request. Then early December '09 they sent me a Statutory Demand, I sent a 2nd CCA request which they acknowledged but have not complied with. I'm in Court next Thursday for the set aside hearing :eek:

So sadly the issue isn't resolved yet, but hopefuly will be very soon.

 

I'm not sure if they purposely ignore correspondence they receive, or if they are just totally incompetent...I peronally think both.

 

The moral is NEVER TRUST THEM.

 

btw F&F offer is full and final offer.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Zimmie for the information.

How do I go about writing the F&F letter? Or in fact reply to their letter as described above?

I dont want them to pile more charges ontop of the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sending this. Let me know if this would fine. Thanks.

 

 

 

"I write with reference to the money which you are claiming on the above account.

I can confirm that I am unable to offer to pay the money in full due to my financial and personal circumstances. However, I can raise £300 and I want to offer this as an ex-gratia payment in full and final settlement of the account. This offer is made on the clear understanding that, if accepted, neither you or any associate company will take any other action to enforce or pursue this debt in any way whatsoever and that I will be released from any liability.

I also request that, if accepted, you will mark any entry on a credit reference agency file relating to the above account as "satisfied" in full.

 

 

Payment can be made within 1 month of receiving your written agreement of this offer and method of payment.

I look forward to receiving your reply.

 

 

Yours faithfully"

Link to post
Share on other sites

akuma, I understand your desire to resolve matters speedily. However, before rushing to make a F&F to them I do think you should have confirmed that they do now legally own the debt.

 

Their first letter says they have bought the debt. Therefore I believe you should have recieved a Notice of Assigment, either from them, but more convincingly (if you get my drift) from the original creditor. Could others please confirm that?

 

I would hate for you to give CapQuest your money only to discover that someone else came along later and told you they had no right to it. Unfortunately in this "game" (I do slightly hestitate to call it that because it is about people's money, livelihoods, hopes and aspirations) you do learn to work slowly towards your goal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...