Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How about posting the full email, rather than just the bits you want us to see??
    • Hi Folks,   Thank you for your help so far. Please find below the correspondence so far from various parties. If I've missed anything, please let me know. Again, apologies for not posting the correct stuff. I thought I'd lost it all, turns out it was on a rarely used pc Letter advising of change of address will be posted shortly, with proof of posting not tracked. Buncrana 1 Edited Notice To Keeper ECP.pdf 2 ECP Back of PCN.pdf 3 DRP Edited 25012021.docx 4 DRP Back of letter.docx 5 POPLA Appeal redacted.pdf 6 DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf ESSO Cobham Signage.pdf
    • Thanks just looked at SARequest It wouldn’t make ebay have to say why they suspended me. all their email said was that it was related to buying activity. But under that bike buying activity there are about five different reasons why it could’ve been. But they haven’t specified which of these five reasons it was.
    • Thank you Ethel, their letter was literally one line, with an added bonus of a typo..... "As you own the land that the property was damaged on we would not be able to dela with that aspect of the claim.", so I think it may be the initial fob off. I have replied just stating "This is not correct, the fence is owned by XYZ ltd, please clarify?", but will follow it up with a letter from the company. will let you know how I get on x
    • About a year ago i was summonsed to court for a speeding offence, long story short it wasn't me that was driving the vehicle, and i successfully proved that i had not received any paperwork (the reason it went to a summons) because there is a problem with our address, i live at number 7, yet when you look online to enter our address for anything you have 7, 5-7 and 7-9 on our street, one is my address and two are businesses.  The court ruled that there was an issue, and agreed i did not receive any paperwork (aside from me not being the driver)  i thought it odd that i never received anything in the post to say that, but they are the courts i assumed everything would be in order. Now just recently i have been using family members vehicles to get to work and have been insuring the vehicles on a temporary basis. Recently when using a comparison website i would get results and then when i went to make payment it would not let me advance, i had tried this on numerous sites and the same happened, i assumed that it would have been because i have used to many temporary insurances and it may have flagged for whatever reason. i went to check my license online, and i cant view it, it states below, i called the DVLA and they can not view any details either and have said they will need to raise a case internally to find out what has happened.  My wife and brother seem to think that the courts have screwed up not informed the DVLA of anything, hence i was banned. But surely it wouldn't have taken so long for me to stop being able to insure my vehicle on a temporary basis until just now?? Please can anyone assist as im worried sick now and ive done absolutely nothing wrong, i need my license for my job. .................... It has not been possible to display/match your driving licence. For further information regarding your driving licence details write to: Central Casework Group, Drivers Enquiries, DVLA, Swansea, SA6 7JL
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CPR 31.14 request submitted-Please help!!


dcems
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5097 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

I am helping my friend defend two cases from Howard Coward - both for Santander debts.

 

Out of curiosity, before they decided to issue a claim, did they send any demands for payment?

 

I'll help you along with your case where I can; you are probably 1 week ahead in yours.

 

Time? Well the courts work when they work. A lot of people do not realise litigation is a long game. My case against HFO will end on the 22nd as I have a hearing for my wasted costs. The actual first judgement was entered in July 2007. I have been in contact with them since February 2009 and I set aside the CCJ in November 2009.

 

Long game requiring lots of patience.

 

I think we need to address the matter of CPR 31.14 too; they are incorrect about it not being relevant. The case has not been allocated yet (from what I have read) and they are required to follow the CPR regarding disclosure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm on similar time frames to you, sent my allocation questionnaire back around 5th Feb stating I didn't want mediation and just received my court date, however the date is reliant on Cohens paying the £75 fees before XX March - it says if they don't pay it gets struck off - bit of a waiting game for me now

Cabot - £7000 - can't provide docs :)

Red Castle/GUS - unenforcable - phoney docs:)

Halifax £2000 bank charges refunded 12/7/07:)

Halifax (round 2) - LBA 30/8/08 - £2500 back within 3 weeks

Nat West - £2,000 - WON offer dated 7th December 2009 (a week after the Supreme Court Ruling !!!!)

 

In progress

 

Yorkshire (hubby) - LBA sent, discussion reggarding hardship undertaken waiting to see what their plans are after Supreme Court Case

 

Capital 1 - SAR'd - typed docs provided not originals gonna play letter ping pong for a while

Halifax Visa - when I get a moment

Halifax personal loan - when I get a moment

 

If all these come to cash I'll be a millionaire (ish)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On my two cases, one didn't get past the Allocation questionaire stage, the other they had to pay an extra £35 to submit there AQ's as they where late.

 

Your find Howard Cohen never reply to most cases, and will go against the Courts ruling till the last minute.

When i won both my cases with Howard Cohen, also won wasted costs for both cases. It wasn't till i sent them a 7 day reminder, that they paid up.

 

Gaz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gaz, this thing about getting costs back interests me - whilst at the moment I am still more interested in getting rid of the debt and the court case dangling over my head I would be interested in giving them a taste of their own medicine if I am successful.

 

What is the procedure? and what do you claim for? things like printing, envelopes and postage? what about time taken to prepare defence etc Any info would help - I am floundering a little with my own case simply through a lack of knowledge and understanding of procedures I'm simply keeping my fingers crossed that they chose not to cough up the £75 although I have a feeling I will be seeing them in court :mad:

Cabot - £7000 - can't provide docs :)

Red Castle/GUS - unenforcable - phoney docs:)

Halifax £2000 bank charges refunded 12/7/07:)

Halifax (round 2) - LBA 30/8/08 - £2500 back within 3 weeks

Nat West - £2,000 - WON offer dated 7th December 2009 (a week after the Supreme Court Ruling !!!!)

 

In progress

 

Yorkshire (hubby) - LBA sent, discussion reggarding hardship undertaken waiting to see what their plans are after Supreme Court Case

 

Capital 1 - SAR'd - typed docs provided not originals gonna play letter ping pong for a while

Halifax Visa - when I get a moment

Halifax personal loan - when I get a moment

 

If all these come to cash I'll be a millionaire (ish)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gaz, this thing about getting costs back interests me - whilst at the moment I am still more interested in getting rid of the debt and the court case dangling over my head I would be interested in giving them a taste of their own medicine if I am successful.

 

What is the procedure? and what do you claim for? things like printing, envelopes and postage? what about time taken to prepare defence etc Any info would help - I am floundering a little with my own case simply through a lack of knowledge and understanding of procedures I'm simply keeping my fingers crossed that they chose not to cough up the £75 although I have a feeling I will be seeing them in court :mad:

 

 

Yes, most important thing is win your case first getting costs is a bonus.

I never put up any fees to get my wasted costs through.

Allthough both cases was different, one never got to the AQ's stage that one i managed to get what i put down on my wasted costs sheet.

How this came about was after the case was struck out, i phoned the Court to ask if i could put in for wasted costs. Which was advised by the Courts to submit a Costs sheet to the Court. Which was then granted by the Judge and i was allowcated a date for this. I had to supply the other side with a copy of my cost as well.

The wasted costs case went to Court, which the other side never turned up and i was awarded the full amount i was asking for.

 

Now the other case was a bit different, as this went to Court which i won.

Tried to get wasted costs from the Judge, but was only awarded Petrol and parking expences.

 

Remember the same judge listerned to both my cases months apart from each other, i'm still trying to fathem how i got the full amount for one and only a small amount for the other.

 

So when claiming try and claim for everything, and split everything up as time spent and stationary and postage include as well.

 

 

 

Gaz

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

just updating you all. got a court date for the 18th may. have sent in my statement and copies of all documents. also got a mediation questionaire as well. not happy that about £200 in court costs seems to have been added to this debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just been reading your thread dcems. Did you go to court today?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...