Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

benefit fraud


rantz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5292 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been married to my wife since 2003. We have been living together from june 2003 to july 2009.... I have two children from her , she has two children from her previous marriage... She has been claiming as a single parent from 2003 to january 2009... In 2006 till 2007 she was running a business from her home address on my name and claiming benefits...On every document she filled in has her handwriting on it for the business... Ini 2004 she was convicted of fraud and deception for defrauding an insurance company..

In 2006 she changed her name her name so that she could go to college to study law.. In 2008 she went to local university to study law..... In feb 2009 she wanted me to go out and work and still claim for benefits.. I am a full time carer for my father and so i refused.. In july she left the house where we livid together. She went to her mothers house... I rang her a few days later to ask her when she will return home.. She rang the police and told them i was harrasing her... An harrasment order was then served on me..

On the 14 july 2009 i wrote a letter to her university and told them she had a conviction on her name ... They then wrote to her. she then went to the university and told them a sob story that she had been a victim of domestic violence ..... On the 19 july 2009 she made a statement to the police that she had been a victim of domestic violence for 7 years ... Then the arrested me for the alleged offence.. i am on police bail . I have been bailed twice naw... There is no history of domestic violence since we have been together.. She has made this up to play the victim... I have told the benefit fraud agency of the benefit fraud she has been doing.. I have sent into them prove of my marriage, home made movies letters that show that i was living with her for seven years, she is denaying that i liveid with her...THe benefit agency havent yet approched her.. I am worried becouse i hope they dont believe her made up sob stories, she is a very good actor... Can anybody tell me what could happen with the benefit agency, will she get a way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid it's impossible to answer. The decision for a penalty would lie with the person who makes the final determination on the case. What I can say is that if she was claiming on the grounds of being a single parent when she was not, is she will be made to repay the money regardless. What penalty she would get on top of that, if any, would be down to the DWP. They may prosecute, they may not.

 

If you knew what she was doing at the time, you could also be implicated in it.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though you have provided DWP with evidence of your marriage etc they will still need to conduct their own investigation and this can take months, particularly if they decide to obtain bank statements and other financial information relating to her business activities. The fact that your wife has not been approached yet does not mean she has got away with it. Also as Erika has pointed out in her post there is a possibility you could also be interviewed, and subsequently charged, with either knowingly allowing or aiding and abetting benefit fraud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

rantz, it does come accross as if your motives are bitterness that should be let go. On the benefit issue you are just as liable if you knew about it and on the kays issue 2003, come on now, you must have known about it earlier. Could be seen as malice so move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think that the DWP would be interested in your ex wifes defrauding of Kays. ;)

 

If they do investigate your claims to your wifes benefit fraud then the enquiries and evidence gathering can take months in order to get the case together.

Do you think you may have opened a can of worms, you may have implicated yourself as well

 

Lou has offered good advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife is constantly laying to the police and to the courts that i am breaching my undertaking..This is a big bunch of lies... She causes damages to her car and rings the police and tells them it was me... The reason why she is doing this to prevent me from having any contact or custody with my kids...

I will leave the kays and benefit issue, i dont want to go down that road..thanks for warning me loopy and micky... What can i do about this game she is playing inregard to damaging her own car and blaming me for it??

Link to post
Share on other sites

She has no proof you are damaging her car, the police should take no action there hopefully. The only harm here she is doing is to her car.

Are you on benefits now ?

If you are consider seeing a solicitor you should be entitled to legal aid

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were you, I'd start keeping a diary of your wife's behaviour so that you have a full record of what she gets up to and details of all communication between you.

 

My brother-in-law has been married to my sister for over 2 years, but his first wife still pops up every so often. She had him arrested last year for supposedly assaulting her. The reality was that she had started paying visits to his elderly mother who suffered with dementia to try and get into her Will. He found her at the house and chucked her out.

 

Some people will stop at nothing.... You need to protect yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...