Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

yay, Im A Celebrity is back!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5323 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am really dissapointed that Jordan is back in it. I dont think there should be a do-over! Oh and if I hear the silly bint say "closure" one more time I will offer her some closure!!!!!!!!

 

Loved the rest of the group, cant remember which but seeing one of the camp campers squeal like a girl when he found a bug on him was hillarious...what the hell is he gonna be like when they are tipping thousands on him?

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't understand her logic of going in while most of the people out here really don't like her. Especially since her divorce. Every one you speak to is liking Peter. She must be mad!! There is no way on earth she can win it.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

She gets paid whether she wins it or not. Not so mad. More like desperate now that her exposure is disappearing fast. A last attempt to a shot in the limelight before she sinks wherever ex-page 3 disappear once they are no longer fresh enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they made a series in the genre of "Trisha" and called it "Katie" there would be a chavalanche trying to get through the doors!

 

I never watch anything with her, but she knows how to get her name in the papers and spin it to a positive message and to her advantage!

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we were supposed to feel sorry for her last night during her trial. I didnt feel sorry for her. My OH and I think that she will be voted to do every trial and then voted off the first chance.

 

I think this gamble wont pay off. I dont think the money will have been the only factor, In my opinion she is wanting to get back in the public's good books because she knows she is vilified in the press and Peter is held up like the caring father where she abandons her kids yet again to go into the Jungle for fame.

 

I just wish she wasnt in it, I want to find out about the others. I get the feeling that George Hamilton will be fascinating if he is given enough space, but i feel we wont get the opportunity to find out because its going to be all about her.

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

BREAKING NEWS.....

 

That girl who blends in with the trees (Camilla I think her name is....blond one) has left the jungle. And some old boxer has gone in. Joe Bugner

 

Sorry if I spoilt it, but Jowalshy told me and I'm bored so I had to spill!! :D:p

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Made me laugh how This Morning and other ITV programmes were 'bigging' IAC up, by saying that Jordan was going into the jungle to 'stir things up' and she said she 'wanted closure'.

 

Also, had to laugh at her 'panic attack' some people eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

she is so stupid it is beyond belief

You don't think she is a very shrewd manipulative person and that is all an act?

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

awful television.

to quote stephen fry "Complete loose-stool water, A^$£-gravy of the very worst kind."

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have to admit it the show is quite funny but then add Ant and Dec to the equasion and it is hillarious, Ant trying to imitate Kim the other night was hillarious!

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...