Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, all done as requested. Defence left blank for now. Just one small question in relation to the CPR31:14.... Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim: and it says * delete if not mentioned in the Particulars of claim. I'm not  sure if I ask for everything or nothing as I can't see any of the list mentioned in the POCs
    • Fund management firm Allan Gray also said giving Nationwide's members a vote on the £2.9 billion buyout would have been 'a much better path'.View the full article
    • A Swiss pressure group says some staff at Shein suppliers are still working excessive overtime.View the full article
    • Let me start by saying I feel tremendous regret, shame and remorse. I have some debt and personal life has fallen apart over the last year which has caused me to be careless. Doesn’t make it okay I know. In a positive way, i will never take anything in life for granted ever again. I want to volunteer and go back to being a good person. I need some advice/reassurance on the below so I can move on better from this experience. A few days ago I was caught at sainsburys, I paid for part of the food (about £5) and didn’t pay for the other (about £8-10) at self checkout. when I got to the exit someone in plain clothes asked to see my receipt and bag and that they worked for mitie. I told him the receipt was in the store bin (true) and he said he followed me round and knows I didn’t pay for all of it. he very sternly but calmly said he just needs my name then I can leave with the shopping. I said i am in a bad day and can’t do this and was on the verge of breaking down. So I handed him the shopping and slowly walked out. No name given (I read elsewhere this is good and makes it unlikely to develop) and I have no way knowing if police contacted. I overthink a lot and I wonder if they can track me via debit card or nectar card on the transaction. I also wonder if they saw me do it last month and have been waiting for me. I know someone who works at their head office and terrified somehow it will get back. I’m also terrified of being recognised in the street.    I don’t know what’s going to happen. I see a lot in the news today about shoplifting 
    • Hi, I’ve just spotted an Arrangement to Pay marker (TransUnion) on my Barclays Mortgage account for 1 month in March 2022. I’ve spoken to Barclays Customer Service and Complaints about this and they’ve given me some background but have closed my complaint: Direct Debit for mortgage bounced in February and I didn’t notice this at the time. Realised there were arrears in March and called customer service straight away. Offered to pay half the arrears on the call with the other half of the arrears the following month. I prob suggested or accepted this as had done that many years previously when I was a poor student with no adverse consequences. Paid in accordance with this. Barclays call notes report they informed me credit reference agencies would be notified and I indicated I understood. However, complaints team couldn’t access the call because it was too old. They advised I could request a transcript through GDPR and complain via ombudsman if still unhappy - I’ll process the GDPR request this week. Whilst it may be factual that I entered into some kind of arrangement regarding the arrears, it wasn’t clear to me that they would be treating it and reporting it as a formal payment plan along with the potential consequences of this. At no point did I agree to or request to “reducing my contractual payments” - I paid my contractual amount for March and April with 50% more on top. I guess it’s likely they did say something vague about credit reference agencies and it’s also possible that I may have agreed without fully understanding it would be different to a late payment marker. I’m not 100% sure of the impact of the AP but I believe it did tighten up balance transfer and new card offers (Lloyds group in particular) even though the rest of my report is spotless and I have many years managing multiple high balance cards. Although it may have been less comfortable, I also believe I had the means to pay the balance in full if I’d realised the impact at the time. Finally, it feels like Ive been penalised for speaking to customer services directly rather than just upping my payments to cover the arrears. Historically, I was under the impression that Barclays mortgages weren’t even reporting arrears of less than 2-3 months as late payments - although this may have changed since the last time I was in arrears. I’ve had a browse through threads about AP markers and it seems like removal is unlikely if it’s deemed factual but it may be worthwhile escalating to FOS or ICO? Will update with transcript details once I’ve raised and received a response to my request. I suppose the upside of this is that I’ll be even more cautious about negative markers in the future. Thanks, J
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • I agree
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Crap One invalid Default notices


vengeancedemon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4955 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just a thought, if, as has been suggestedby the good brains here that the DN being defective, the account has been effectively terminated by Cap 1 and so now doesnt exist, are not Lowells committing a Criminal Fraud (Fraud Act 2006?) by attempting to collect? I believe this is a level five offence, big fines and or chokey?

Or am I being optimistic?

Mind you CPS?police are probably as useless as all the others, maybe I should bubble Cornell up for wiping his nose in a car park !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

fraud

 

as with the vast majority of criminal offences it is the INTENT that is the hardest to prove.

 

you really would be wasting your time, in dealing with civil matters, to be even thinking about allegations of a criminal nature unless the offence jumps up and bites you on the bum and points you to the uncontestable evidence to support it

 

 

 

If you are a LIP and you intend to accuse the other side of any criminal act - my advice would be:-

 

don't bother turning up at court- why waste your own costs as well as having to pay the other side's when you lose the case!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Letters received from Cap 1 as attachments

 

Firstly, they have completely ignored the most excellent letter (Thank you pinky 69) in post 21 of this saga. So as far as I can see, the D/N is still invalid as detailed in early posts and advice.

 

What they have sent is:

 

C1 - C2-C3 the letter

 

C4 The "Agreement"

 

C5 & 6 the first and last paages (A4) of the T & C, I am suspect that the penalty charges on last page are not those in force at timme of issue (2000)

 

Any further comments would be aoppreciated as I expect the Leeds loosers to come over the horizon soon

Files, 4-5-6 are on next post

c1.pdf

c2.pdf

c3.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Humm the charges i think are right for 200 as they are £15.00.

 

What tho does worry me is number 7 it basically says who ever uses your card for anything you have to pay them.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

 

But, to my mind, and correct me if I am wrong, the whole process of any collection/enforceability/validity of documents etc falls apart on the fact that Crapone issued a deficient and defective DN.

 

 

It might well do BUT they have now obviously got a DN listed on all the CRA's and probably are happy with that 'cheap' way to do things. If they never take you to court they can just leave the DN's there. It might well end up that the only way you might have them reoved is to go to the court yourself and they know this.

 

It could be well argued that them taking you to court is probably a good chance for you to win. If you take them to court all the work needed has to be done by you with no 100% rate of success guaranteed. I've said elsewhere that I think often these companies are aware people have no or little funds so often it might be pointless to take court action. In this way you are still penalised for 6 years and as we know a DN is as bad as a CCJ on a CRA file.

 

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

 

But, to my mind, and correct me if I am wrong, the whole process of any collection/enforceability/validity of documents etc falls apart on the fact that Crapone issued a deficient and defective DN.

 

(Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983, a failure of a Default Notice or Termination Notice to be accurate not only invalidates such notice (Woodchester Lease Management Services Ltd V Swain & Co NLD 14 July 1998 but it is an unlawful rescission of contract which would not only prevent the court enforcing any alleged debt (Wilson V First County Trust Ltd [2003] UKHL 40, Wilson V Robertsons (London) Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1088, Wilson V Pawnbrokers [2005] EWCA Civ 147) - but would also give the claimant a claim for damages in the sum of £1000 (Kpophraror V Woolwich Building Society [1996] 4 All ER 119).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your thoughts, I dont intend to take action against them, cant afford it anyway, but I will use the invalid DN as a defence if they launch anything gainst me

 

Thank you again

 

Exactly bearing in mind the DN remains.

 

It makes me laugh that when I was brought up my parents and probably everyone those days had great respect for banks and the like. These days their actions to you (and me) mean they no longer have thar respect or integity anymore. They don't seem to care anymore.

 

A Shame.

 

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

God my grammar is getting worse! I just had to copy that picture. Made me smile so much. ;)

 

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vengance.

 

I dont blame u re the starting action they are pains in ass.

 

Its a year since my win against them and i feel better for it.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Interesting letter from Crapone, completeley ignoring the letter ( see above) sent to their Data Controller regarding the Defective default notice and its legal implications thereof, and that they are perfectly entitled under the original agreement ( I have yet to see even an "Application form" to pass this to whoemsover. Lowells have not said anything since being told of the deficient D/N in December,

 

I wonder if I should persue this with C1 or just let sleeping dogs lie?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello vengeancedemon.

 

Fascinating thread and compelling reading.

 

I'm also dealing with Crap1 (see my thread Mr Silver v Crap1).

 

Some thoughts: based on my case and I assume your case?

 

1. Part of the alleged Crap1 credit card debt is or would be made up, I assume, of unfair/ penalty charges?

 

2. If so, and you want to have the Default Notice removed from your Credit File (like I do) then I believe that by virtue that the Crap1 alleged debt is made up of unfair/penalty charges which are unlawful under the CCA 2006 Unfair Terms and Conditions amendment.

 

3. That makes any Default Notice unlawful too? Correct me if I am wrong?

 

4. Thus when Crap1 state in their letter to you that you 'consented' under the Crap1 agreement for them to pass or share financial credit information about you (and me and others) re 'debts' and 'defaults' to Credit Reference Agencies under the Date Protection Act (section 78); they can only do that if - a BIG if in this and many other cases - the 'alleged debt' (outstanding sum/amount) is ACCURATE.

 

5. Clearly where part of the alleged debt is made up of UNFAIR / penalty which have been declared UNLAWFUL, the alleged Crap1 debt is therefore INACCURATE and as such must NOT be passed on or shared with Credit Reference Agencies since that would be a breach of section 78 of the DPA!

 

6. Therefore you should be able to request via the County Court that Crap1 and Lowell desist from processing false and INACCURATE information and demand too that the CRAs remove the INACCURATE default notice from your credit file and also seek damages for injury to your creditworthiness.

 

I intend to simply write a letter giving Crap1 14 days to pay me compensation otherwise County Court action for defamation!

 

Also requesting that they IMMEDIATELY stop processing my information under the DPA or face the consequences with a major damages claim in the Court Court.

 

Hope that information (if correct) is helpful.

 

P.S.

 

I should also add that part of my claim is also for reclaiming UNFAIR credit card charges and a separate DISPUTE claim re: disputed unauthorised transactions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course whilst the DN might be defective I bet until you go to court it'll not be removed. It's the recent 'easy and cheap' route for most financial institutions in to just leaving it as a DN. If they go for a CCJ the difference is that it costs them money and you can defend it with a better chance of winning than you taking them to court. The downside of course is that a DN on the CRA files it's just as bad as a CCJ. Remembering both are there for 6 years.

 

Michael

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello vengeancedemon.

 

Fascinating thread and compelling reading.

 

I'm also dealing with Crap1 (see my thread Mr Silver v Crap1).

 

Some thoughts: based on my case and I assume your case?

 

1. Part of the alleged Crap1 credit card debt is or would be made up, I assume, of unfair/ penalty charges?

 

2. If so, and you want to have the Default Notice removed from your Credit File (like I do) then I believe that by virtue that the Crap1 alleged debt is made up of unfair/penalty charges which are unlawful under the CCA 2006 Unfair Terms and Conditions amendment.

 

3. That makes any Default Notice unlawful too? Correct me if I am wrong?

 

4. Thus when Crap1 state in their letter to you that you 'consented' under the Crap1 agreement for them to pass or share financial credit information about you (and me and others) re 'debts' and 'defaults' to Credit Reference Agencies under the Date Protection Act (section 78); they can only do that if - a BIG if in this and many other cases - the 'alleged debt' (outstanding sum/amount) is ACCURATE.

 

5. Clearly where part of the alleged debt is made up of UNFAIR / penalty which have been declared UNLAWFUL, the alleged Crap1 debt is therefore INACCURATE and as such must NOT be passed on or shared with Credit Reference Agencies since that would be a breach of section 78 of the DPA!

 

6. Therefore you should be able to request via the County Court that Crap1 and Lowell desist from processing false and INACCURATE information and demand too that the CRAs remove the INACCURATE default notice from your credit file and also seek damages for injury to your creditworthiness.

 

I intend to simply write a letter giving Crap1 14 days to pay me compensation otherwise County Court action for defamation!

 

Also requesting that they IMMEDIATELY stop processing my information under the DPA or face the consequences with a major damages claim in the Court Court.

 

Hope that information (if correct) is helpful.

 

P.S.

 

I should also add that part of my claim is also for reclaiming UNFAIR credit card charges and a separate DISPUTE claim re: disputed unauthorised transactions.

 

if you are in monthly arrears, the reference on the credit file is not, as far as i know, shown as a specific figure

 

similarly a file that is endorsed as defaulted (correct me someone if i am wrong) does not show the amount by which you defaulted- simply that you defaulted (it might show only the total of the loan defaulted on)

 

if so then any argument that you may have as to whether the amount by which you have defaulted is erroneous would be of no consequence!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are in monthly arrears, the reference on the credit file is not, as far as i know, shown as a specific figure

 

similarly a file that is endorsed as defaulted (correct me someone if i am wrong) does not show the amount by which you defaulted- simply that you defaulted (it might show only the total of the loan defaulted on)

 

if so then any argument that you may have as to whether the amount by which you have defaulted is erroneous would be of no consequence!!

 

Personally I would say that when a default arrives and you are intending to refute/take action against it then it's 'you' who has to do the donkey work. Whilst a default might show the arrears at the time by not complying the charge is on the whole amount being repayable.

 

My belief is that armed with a hopefully truthful SAR you can list the original sum, interest, arrears and disputed charges. Whilst the financial institution could easily do this they of course decide not to. The uphill struggle is that you, if you decide to contest it in a CC 'you' have to show and prove what is considered unfair and unjust. Of course the first remark would be under the T&C's if you falter then it all becomes payable on demand.

 

In my case (regarding HSBC) I can prove that the DN is invalid by a bad date reference but I am also aware that this might be 'ignored'. Now if again, in my case the bank was to go for a CCJ they are well aware that I have a better chance of winning by that same date issue. So in their view I am destined to be hassled and persued as they are aware if I challenge them in court they've a good chance of winning.

 

Michael

(who now feels banks have now got the upper hand)

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit reports show a "default balance", which is the amount you are supposed to owe them, and this is easily challenged where records are incomplete or charges and interest have been added whilst an account was in dispute. I have statements form CrapOne that all give the same figure and there is no way of knowing how that figure was arrived at!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all your thoughts, I am tempted to go down, at the moment, the route of having a go at C1 under Data Protection, ie passing this to firstly Crapquest ( and inter alia HL Legal) and then to Lowells afterthey have uttered a defective D/N as described above, and therefore rescinded the agreement ie it no longer exists(?).

 

As I have mentioned, CrapQ dropped it pdq and HL Legal have not made any further reference, and when LWLS where advised of this, and told to soad orf, have heard no more from them, Cap one seem to think that they are in the right by not even producing anything remotely like an agreement, not even the famous "Application Form"

 

Is it worth reportuing them to Info Comms and others, or am I wasting my time as these regulatory bodies sem to do not much?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

I have had a long running battle with Cap one to start with, a brief foray with Crapquest and HL Legal and then Lowells

 

Just to be brief, I initially sent Cap 1 a CCa, they didnt really respond ( suprise) and a defective default notice ie totally illegal was issued, it then went to CrapQ and Hl who were seen off in short oder and then after a long pause the Leeds Loosers appeared ( about 18 months ago) a lot of letter tennis and finally today the attached - yippee

 

Should I do anything else like write to them and get confirmation that they have not done anything to my CRA ( not that I care about that) and that they havnt sold it to any other pond **** etc or just file it away very very safely?

scan.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...