Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
    • Thanks for all the suggestions so far I will amend original WS and send again for review.  While looking at my post at very beginning when I submitted photos of signs around the car park I noticed that it says 5 hours maximum stay while the signage sent by solicitor shows 4 hours maximum stay but mine is related to electric bay abuse not sure if this can be of any use in WS.
    • Not sure what to make of that or what it means for me, I was just about to head to my kip and it's a bit too late for legalise. When is the "expenditure occured"?  When they start spending money to write to me?  Or is this a bad thing (as "harsh" would imply)? When all is said and done, I do not have two beans to rub together, we rent our home and EVERYTHING of value has been purchased by and is in my wife's name and we are not financially linked in any way.  So at least if I can't escape my fate I can at least know that they will get sweet FA from me anyway   edit:  ah.. Sophia Harrison: Time bar decision tough on claimants WWW.SCOTTISHLEGAL.COM Time bar is a very complex area of law in Scotland relating to the period in which a claim for breach of duty can be pursued. The Scottish government...   This explains it like I am 5.  So, a good thing then because creditors clearly know they have suffered a loss the minute I stop paying them, this is why it is "harsh" (for them, not me)? Am I understanding this correctly?  
    • urm......exactly what you filed .....read it carefully... it puts them to strict proof to prove the debt is enforceable, so thus 'holds' their claim till they coughup or not and discontinue. you need to get readingthose threads i posted so you understand. then you'll know whats maybe next how to react or not and whats after that. 5-10 threads a day INHO. dont ever do anything without checking here 1st.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC - me too


wendbrid
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6421 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

We have just started a claim against HSBC in order to claim back charges on behalf of my son of over £4000.00! Needless to say he is always in debt and their advice is consolidate with a personal loan at an interest of 14.8% - I don't think so.

 

We requested details of charges and were sent two copies of statements going back six years and our cheque to cover admin costs was returned.

 

Emailed them yesterday requesting they did not apply a further £140 worth of charges next week. Received a very quick reply saying charges are fair, appropriate and reasonable and no refund will be forthcoming. They also 'advised' me that the Office of Fair Trading report published on 5th April referred to Credit card default charges only.

 

We have today posted the first letter to them along with a breakdown of charges.

 

Bit apprehensive at the moment, but will keep you posted.

 

Wendy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck Wendy! They will try and fob you off all the way ...... Ignore 'em!

If everything is done the right way, and everyone on here will help!, then there's no reason why your money shouldn't be heading back to you by the end of the summer!! :D

28/07/06 - Prelim letter sent to HSBC for £3648

31/07/06 - Letter rec'd at HSBC

14/08/06 - LBA sent to HSBC

16/08/06 - LBA rec'd at HSBC

22/08/06 - Finally!! first reply from HSBC offering £2000

23/08/06 - Letter to HSBC declining offer, saying I want ALL my money!!

31/08/06 - MCOL filed for £4551.96, to be deemed served on 06/09/06

05/09/06 - HSBC Acknowledge claim

22/09/06 - DG Solicitors offer full amount in settlement, I accept!!

27/09/06 - Full amount paid into my acount

28/09/06 - Full amount taken out of my account!!!!!:mad:

29/09/06 - Cheque arrives, FOR SOMEBODY ELSE!! with all their account details in a letter adressed to me!!!

29/09/06 - HSBC refuse to pay money back into my account

 

 

 

If I have been of any help, please click on the scales in the top right corner! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your support it is really appreciated - I hope we can be successful as my son is getting married next year and it would be great if they could start their married life without this debt hanging over their heads.

 

Wendy:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wendy, you have come to the right place. I found this site a few months ago and have also been planning a wedding for next year. I received a full offer last week of almost £4000 which has helped enormously to pay for the wedding/honeymoon. I wish you all the best and there is always someone here ready to offer advice when you need it.

 

Good luck, you will get it back!

 

Louise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go for it!!!

Barney2002 - If you want to see how I got my money back, click http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/11376-barney2002-hsbc-round-one.html.

 

HSBC

15/08/06 - £4955 paid in full from HSBC!!!!!!! 'Ave it!!

OTHERS

04/08 - Conf rec'd from Capital One - sending statements

07/08 - Conf rec'd from Tesco Finance - sending statements,29/08 sent prelim for £282

10/08 - Conf rec'd MBNA - sending statements.02/09 prelim for £437

10/08 - Conf rec'd Morgan Stanley - need to send ID - sent 11/08,rec'd letter offering £96(rejecting), 02/09 prelim for £220- Rec'd £240 few days ago.

 

If any advice I give is helpful then please hit the scales - Top Right. Thank you.

 

** For Every bed I sell to a CAG Forum member, I will donate £50 to the CAG **

 

Visit my site for the full range of Hand Forged Beds at

www.classicsiniron.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have just sent this in reply to thier email

 

Thank you for your prompt response to my email dated 14th August. I feel that this is an appropriate time to inform you that I have sent a request for repayment of charges along with a schedule of the unlawful charges levied upon this account over the last six years and my joint account over the last two years.

If you do not stop the impending charges of £125, these, along with any additional interest incurred in being overdrawn, will be added to the claim for unlawful charges.

Whilst I understand that the OFT report published on the 5th April 2006 was issued with regard to credit card default charges, the OFT’s position is that ‘These principles also apply to default charges in other consumer contracts such as those for bank overdrafts, store cards and mortgages’. This statement further demonstrates that HSBC as a creditor, have a requirement to comply with the 1999 Consumer Credit Act Unfair Terms & Consumer Contracts and therefore subject to proving that the charges are lawful and proportionate.

 

I'm not sure that entering in to two different lines of communication with HSBC is the right thing to do, but if we can stop this months charges it'll be a respite.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Wendbrid is my partner so I thought I'd update on how things have gone so far.

 

We had no joy with the above email and so this months charges were taken.

 

The 14 days were up on the 31 August and we send a LBA yesterday.

 

Today in the post we got a reply to the prelim letter offering half of the amount of the charges (less interest) claimed for the joint account and what appears to be about half the amount plus interest claimed for my partners son's personal account.

 

Now, the letter before action has been sent and these offers run out in 10 days so do we just sit it out or do we reply to these offers accepting in partial payment with the intention to claim the rest through MCOL or reply rejecting these offers and do the MCOL thing anyway?

Request for breakdown of charges - 07/06/06

Prelim letter sent claiming a total of £4016.61 - 15/08/06

LBA sent claiming a total of £4115.86 - 03/08/06

Offer of £1999.00 from HSBC in reply to prelim - 04/08/06

Filed MCOL - 22/09/06

HSBC settled for full amount - Oct 06

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can reply to the letters accepting the amounts offered as part payment, but I don't think that it matters too much - either way, unless the amounts offered are accepted in full and final, you'll be proceeding to MCOL very soon. The letters that accompany them state that HSBC will take it you are not accepting the offer as full and final if they don't hear back anyway.

 

I didn't reply to the offer letter i had (offered £980 for a £1200 claim) - on these grounds (HSBC taking it as a rejection if they don't hear) and now I'm days away from getting my full amount (£1707 now interest added). I cannot of course advise you what to do, i'm merely just saying what route I chose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for the reply. We decided on the 11th Sept to send a letter accepting thier offer in partial payment and if the partial payment and the outstanding amount were not credited to the relevent accounts by the 18th Sept we would pursue a claim without further notice.

Had what appears to be the standard reply, blah blah ombudsman blah. So as you predicted we filed the MCOL yesterday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck and i hope you get it all sorted out soon, i amexpecting a simialr half offer on monday form hsbc. do they not know the format of the CAG letters by now? sureley they know if we have gotten this far....:D let us know when they fall like a house of cards wont you

me against the abbey Paid in full (donation made)

me against the woolwich Paid in full(donation made)

me against HSBC Paid in full(donation made)

 

 

beware the scrapbooker, for she has a long memory and sharp knives :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

DG solicitors acknolwledged our claim giving them 28 days. We then got a letter from DG asking for a breakdown of charges, which we sent.

 

A few days before their 28 days were up, we were sent a settlement for the full amount to which we accepted and the money was paid into one of the accounts shortly after :-)

 

All we have left to answer is the MCOL, it says they've entered a defence and I can't do anything online to say the claim has been settled? How do I now inform the courts of this?

 

I'd just like to also say a BIG thanks to the CAG and all it's memebrs, without which, none of this would have been possible (our donation will be forthcoming very soon).

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give MCOL a ring to advise it's been settled - if the case was in your son's name, they'll want to speak to him to confirm, took all of a minute in our case! :D

 

Well done on getting the cash back - it's a great feeling, isn't it? :)

 

Lucy.

Lucycat vs. Halifax 13/9 - £4496.99 - WON!

 

Lucycat vs. MBNA (Alliance & Leicester) - 16/11 - Offer of £295 received - pursuing £575.

 

Lucycat vs. HSBC - 15/11 - MCOL filed - £1438 (& interest at 8% - another £392.49)

 

Lucycat vs. Capital One 15/11 - Offer of £136 received - pursuing £340.

 

Lucycat vs. Halifax - Mortgage ERC - 18/10 - LBA sent - £466.32.

 

Lucycat vs. Halifax - Mortgage Charges - 9/11 - D.P.A. Non-Compliance letter delivered.

 

Lucycat vs. LloydsTSB - Loan PPI - 5/10 - Statement received.

 

Lucycat vs. LloydsTSB - 20/10 - Prelim sent for £45 - returned undelivered, recipient has 'gone away'...! :o

 

* Lucycat vs. Carphone Warehouse - 13/11 - S.A.R. delivered. * Lucycat vs. Volkswagen Finance - 9/11 - S.A.R. delivered. * Lucycat vs. Barclaycard - 15/11 - S.A.R. sent out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd put it in writing to the court - just one line to say you're withdrawing your claim. On the phone they've no proof of your identity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...