Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Appeal hearing over dismissal..all advice is gracefully appreciated..


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5293 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I've been a member of middle management for a few months now and just recently my General Manager has neglected in allocating any managerial duties to me. The General Manager has never liked me and never wanted me in the Management Team to begin with. But he didn't have much of a choice because I had passed all the relevant exams.

 

One afternoon as I was sitting in the Manager's Office (which is normally shared by all Managers), he walked into the room and asked me to leave the office. I wasn't in anyone's way since the office was empty. I told him that I was a member of the Management Team and I didn't see anything wrong in being there. He refused to acknowledge what I had said and asked me to leave the office again. So I did. And on my way out I accused him of discrimination (which I am sure everyone overhead since I just shouted this as I was walking by his office; he has a separate office room). I went over to the staff room and when everyone asked me about what had happened I told them.

 

Momentarily the GM came in and suspended me from work. I was accused of rudeness to management & gross insubordination. And at the disciplinary hearing my services were terminated. My appeal hearing is coming up next week. Before this incident I had complained to HR and Head Office about the GM and his conduct about 6 months before this incident took place. And he wanted to get even in someway. The person who terminated me just happens to be a close mate of the GM. The GM had previously tried to get him to do my Managerial Assessment exam. At the time I was suspicious as to why he was insisting on one person to do the exams when there were so many others just as qualified to do it with. When asked he told me that the person that he was trying to get hold of owes him a favour. I immediately knew what the favour was. Fortunately since I was adamant to have my exam done as originally scheduled he had to get someone else for the assessment.

 

Do you think I stand a chance at the appeal hearing? And what sort of defense do you think I should use?

 

In terms of references I know that the company normally uses a standard form to reply to all inquiries. I have known of incidents where the company had refused to give a reference but haven't heard of any incidents related to bad references. I had been told that it is illegal to give out a bad reference anyway. And yet, I was somewhere in this forum about how a 'gross misconduct' can affect future prospects and references for many years. Is this possible?

 

All help is gracefully appreciated. Thanks ever so much.

 

Jake

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just shouted out "This is discrimination" as I was walking by. I have had a verbal warning about a year ago for lateness. Nothing else. And I have been with the company for 12 years and had never received any disciplinarians except for the one mentioned above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I can't see how that amounts to an act of gross misconduct.

If you'd been abusive, used expletives or used threatening language ('I'm gonna edit punch you!') it would be a different matter.

There was simply no clear material detriment to the company by your actions.

GM is such actions as theft, assault, subjecting others to discrimination or harrassment-actions nothing short of criminal which cost the company.

 

Don't know what anyone else thinks?

Edited by IdaInFife
edited for by passing swear filter
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I had said something a bit more colourful but I have always been careful with what I say in the workplace unless its a joke and we both knew about it.

 

I obviously summarised the incident where the GM suspended me. Didn't see the point of writing everything here. According to the witness statements the GM had called me to come to his office to talk about it. I never heard that because I was trying to read a book during my short lunch break. You see, my GM is more of a person who tells people what to do but never is open to a two way dialog. Very much a manchild sort of personality. So when he came into the staff room, I just said "I don't have time for this" assuming that he was going give me more grief over the incident. A small conversation did take place in the staff room, but it was brief and none of what was conversed there was even taken into account. There are 3 witness statements though. He was trying to reason his actions but I kept on reminding him that I am part of the Management Team. He never acknowledged this but rather said if you are not going to stop arguing you can go home. By this time I had stopped talking to him. I was trying to keep quiet but he kept on trying to provoke me. I didn't know that he was suspending me, so I picked up the book and started walking off. Yes I did say I'll go home. All I ever said in my defense here is that I reminded him a number of times that I was part of the Management Team.

The witness statements didn't mention anything about what happened in the Managers room which is where the GM claiming to have grounds for an act of gross misconduct. That's why I didn't mention it before.

 

Basically I just wanna get through the next phase for now which is the appeal hearing. Since I have been subjected to this sort of thing, I would really appreciate some advice on what I should say.

 

Cheers.

Jake

Link to post
Share on other sites

They followed all the procedures. I have the minutes from the disciplinary hearing and I wasn't accompanied because I didn't wish to be. It's a FTSE 250 company. It's going to be 2 of the Area Managers holding the hearing. They are the same 2 people who conducted the investigation for my grievance about a year ago against the same Manager. They basically said there wasn't enough proof to come to any conclusion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Keep calm

2. Don't lose your temper

3. At the end of the meeting, if they've made notes, GET A COPY!

4. This is your appeal, so make it fit your agenda. Simply state what your arguement is.

If they ask a question, and it's relevant-answer it. Simply. If it's not relevant, state why and don't answer it.

If you ask a question, get an answer. Don't enter into arguement or debate. If they skirt round the issue, reiterate your original question.

5. Don't be drawn into coming to any conclusion. If they offer you something, say you need time to consider their offer. Equally, don't state what you intend to do next.

 

Hope it goes well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...