Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Need some help with Lowell Portfolio


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5239 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Have registered after finding via Google and need some help with Lowell Portfolio after reading lots of bits and pieces about them. Also after reading about them I am not going to post any details as they appear to trawl the forums looking for people so I am going to be specific without identifying.

 

Recieved a letter from them Saturday regarding a debt with a mobile phone company I had problems with a few years ago.

 

Basically, I was in real financial difficulty and a direct debit got returned unpaid. I phoned them about it and explained and all seemed OK, when I could I rang them to pay and paid off the outstanding balance, when I spoke to them and tried to set up a direct debit they told me that as it had gone overdue the only way I could do it was pay £xx or set up a new direct debit which would result in a new 12 month contract being started. Being a bit green to all of it, I set up the direct debit but argued the point about the 12 month contract and was told that they would look into it and come back to me, they never did.

 

After being in debt management for a while and generally getting back on top of things, I checked my credit file and the mobile company (major provider) has registered a default on my account a couple of years ago. Was going to contact them about it when this letter arrived.

 

So at the end of the day, although I don't agree with the way the mobile company handled it, I do owe the money and don't dispute that.

 

Whilst debt collection agencies are not new to me and I do stand up to them, the horror stories about Lowell have me a bit worried as through some bad advice from Harrington Brooks when I was stupid enough to be in a debt management plan with them, I have a few defaults which will be past the 6 year point in the next 12 months so at least I had stayed out of trouble for a while and my credit file was getting in better shape.

 

After reading about Lowell/Red they seem to be complete ******** so I don't want them adding another Default on my account.

 

Whilst although the mobile provider didn't get in touch with me, the default is on there from them so I can't really dispute it too much as I have no letters from them or anything to back up the conversation and they won't speak to me as it's in the hand of Lowell.

 

So, whats the best way to deal with them? Was going to send them a letter offering a full and final settlement offer of 50% based on the agreement they don't sell the debt on (as it seems they do), any default is removed that they (not the mobile provider) place on the account and send it in someone elses name not mine so they can't come back to me. Is this a good way to deal with it or are they just going to say no and start harassing me like they seem to with everyone else?

 

The other alternative is just to tell them I am in debt management and it's either the 50% full and final or they can get the money over however long it's going to take them to get it (think 3 1/2?)

 

Anyone had dealings with them where they haven't had problems after?

 

Any advice is very much appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

Welshman_42

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi & welcome to CAG.

Firstly, stop speaking to them on the phone & refuse to answer security questions if they ring you.

A direct debit should never be set up with any DCA as they can take what they want that way.

Others will be along soon with their own responses for you ;)

 

Hi,

 

Thanks for the advice.

 

Have not rang Lowell yet as there are so many horror stories it seems amazing they haven't been shut down and everyones advice is that way so although I was going to phone them, I decided definitely that was not a good way to do it.

 

Everyone seems really helpful here from what I have read so I look forward to getting some advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the time being it may be best to send them a 'prove it' letter http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/573-general-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt The onus is on them to prove a debt exists and they have the right to collect it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are one of, if not the worst DCA in this country - they are well known on this forum by many of the Caggers.

Not speaking to them on the phone is golden rule number one.

They will say/do anything to get you to pay up.

Although mobile phones are not covered by a CCA - they still need to prove you owe the debt, so a "prove it" letter might be a good starting point for you.

Knowing Lowells...its unlikely they have any proof ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are one of, if not the worst DCA in this country - they are well known on this forum by many of the Caggers.

Not speaking to them on the phone is golden rule number one.

They will say/do anything to get you to pay up.

Although mobile phones are not covered by a CCA - they still need to prove you owe the debt, so a "prove it" letter might be a good starting point for you.

Knowing Lowells...its unlikely they have any proof ;)

 

So even though it's been logged on my credit file (and I kind of know about the debt even if I don't agree with it) from the mobile phone company I can still ask them to prove it?

 

Also, it seems very likely from what others have said they will put a default onto my credit file so if they do and cannot provide proof of the debt, where do I stand getting it removed?

 

Thanks for your advice and time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can ask them to prove it anytime you want.

Report Lowells to the OFT,trading standards & the info commissoner - thats standard practice for Caggers anyway :D

The credit reference agencies are only too willing to assist the DCA's when it comes to putting defaults on credit files unfortunately.

But with a bit of persistant complaining to all the relevant authorities..it can be removed ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the best action is to send the prove it letter, see what comes back and take it from there and under no circumstances, talk to them on the phone?

 

Absolutely right.

 

There is no need to pay these sponging parasites a penny. They have supplied you with nothing and even if the original creditor was owed money, they have long since received a substantial tax credit from writing the account off. If the account is not already statute barred, it soon will be, at which point any reference to it will drop off the credit reference agency files.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had dealings with the various trading styles of the Lowell Group regarding a purported mobile phone account (never had a contract phone and never with the company claimed!) - I've had all the usual threatograms, postcards, etc. Thought things were going well when I received the buy-back offer (supposedly from Red but printed on Lowell paper!).

 

But now it appears that Lowell's have changed tactics because they have 'instructed' Philips to collect this imaginary debt - so Philips have had the barrage of letters including bemused, doorstep collection, S10, etc

 

K

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi,

 

Me again!

 

Lowell Portfolio have had the 'Prove It' letter and still not come back to me to be able to supply documents that show the debt.

 

In the mean time, I have had 3 or 4 letters stating they are trying to get the information but it all dates back to the 20th October 2009.

 

The Default has been transferred from the mobile company to Lowell Portfolio on my credit file too.

 

Is anyone able to recommend the next steps to take? Is it possible to get the default removed as they have been unable to provide information on me owing the debt or is it just better to leave it and put up with it?

 

Thanks in advance for your help, yet again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The next step is to just ignore them until such time as they come up with proof of the alleged debt. If they continue to harass you report them to Trading Standards and the OFT for chasing a disputed debt.

 

Unfortunately getting them to remove a default is virtually impossible :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as they haven't altered the dates then the default on your CRF will remain, they only stay on there for a maximum of six years.

 

However if Lowlifes have altered the date of default to when they bought/chased the debt then that information is incorrect and WILL have to be ammended, incorrect info on your CRF currently attracts a £1000 damages fee, ONLY IF you are brave enough to sue them.

 

I am just waiting for the day I can take a DCA to court:D

Not that my CRF is of any concern to me and I fail to see what all the fuss is about with them, just another Americanism. But I would love to get them to pay me some beer tokens!:p

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...