Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
    • Hands up in the fact that i have probably F***** *P!!
    • Car Finance Awards celebrates best of the industryView the full article
    • I want to add my 2 cents here...  The purchase of this debt, Perch Group dont absolve themselves of liabilities from the Original Creditor. They should be responsible for dealing with this complaint in response to an Irresponsible Lending dispute.  If the balance is disputed as such in that way - Then they should be referring to the Original Creditor where applicable.    Also if your complaint was written in a way where a template wasnt used or it was rewritten to a similar effect where it wasnt recognisable - Then you probably would have stood a better opportunity at it not getting rebuffed.  To be honest those - Perch and TM Legal are a waste of Oxygen and will say anything to get you to pay.    Ditto on the template. Where did you find it?  Please keep in mind we have to unravel what you have done till now and help build a formal response.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can you advise re defaults and credit reports


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5330 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, my friend has two defaults dating back to 11/2003, however on his credit report it says...file updated for the period to 6/2004, what does this mean exactly? I'm fairly certain he hasn't acknowledged or paid anything towards these debts.

 

Also, I found a default letter which states I owe £98, but on my credit report it says £300, this is re Littlewoods, default placed by Phoenix recoveries. I have letters from Littlewoods stating I owe £380, this may be due to charges etc. confusing!

 

If anyone can help I would appreciate it, especially for my friend who is getting married next year and trying to sort his finances out!

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI, Look at the bits in red

 

Hi, my friend has two defaults dating back to 11/2003, however on his credit report it says...file updated for the period to 6/2004, what does this mean exactly? I'm fairly certain he hasn't acknowledged or paid anything towards these debts.

 

The reporting period is when the original creditor last updated the file. They've obviously not bothered since June 04. My advice, don't rock the boat. This debt may already be Statute Barred (depending on payments made)

 

Also, I found a default letter which states I owe £98, but on my credit report it says £300, this is re Littlewoods, default placed by Phoenix recoveries. I have letters from Littlewoods stating I owe £380, this may be due to charges etc. confusing!

 

This has probably been sold by Littlewoods as Phoenix have replaced Littlewoods as the OC. Some dates would be useful

 

If anyone can help I would appreciate it, especially for my friend who is getting married next year and trying to sort his finances out!

 

 

Hope that helps

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he was defaulted around 11/03 and he has made no payments nor acknowledged the debt (in writing) the debt will be SB by 11/09

 

The cause of action (not the default date) is when the SB clock starts ticking.

For example, your friend stopped paying in August 03, the OC starts making late payment markers on his credit file in september and october then defaults him in November, the cause of action (I believe) would be September 03.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it should drop off his file anytime soon. If anyone tries to collect then a stern bog off letter with the terms "Statute Barred" should suffice.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

its for them to prove it not statute barred not for you to prove it is.

 

you've [he's] just got a phishing letter list.

ignore all the letters etc.

even if you reply, it will make no diff

the list will just be sold on.

they dont tell each other they are SB debts. else they won't buy the debt!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou fox and dx,

My friend just gets fed up with all the letters that arrive! he's tempted to call them but I said NO. These people hope that you haven't heard of Consumeractiongroup and therefore don't know your rights. I think he just needs to sit tight for a bit longer.

Thanks to the helpful advice I have recieved on here, I stopped making payments that I couldn't really afford and told a debt collector that arrived at my door without an appointment to come back next week, then I told him I would pay it back at £5 a month and not a penny more! :)

I used to be too scared to open the letters before I found this site.

 

Thanks again, hope it's a sunny day wherever you are as it is here in Dorset!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I stopped making payments that I couldn't really afford and told a debt collector that arrived at my door without an appointment to come back next week, then I told him I would pay it back at £5 a month and not a penny more! :)

I used to be too scared to open the letters before I found this site.

 

Thanks again, hope it's a sunny day wherever you are as it is here in Dorset!

 

well i hope you checked the Co. has a CCA?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...