Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Holiday entitlment query


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5320 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Does anyone know anything about staff holiday entitlement?

 

I am working 3 days a week which equals 18 hours

A colleague of mine works 3 days a week equalling 15 hours.

 

I am told i can only get 12 days a year holiday at this rate but have discovered they are giving my colleague (who is married to one of the bosses) 17 days a year!!

 

Can they pick and choose how much hoilday people get?

 

im really annoyed, my colleague only gets this because of who she is married to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, holiday can differ depending upon time with employer etc.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm happy to be able to help.

When I discovered this forum, a few months ago, I was in a similar position to you (only receiving 12 days holiday entitlement).

 

It was only through reading some of the posts here that I found out I was entitled to more; because the statutory minimum paid holiday entitlement had been increased over the last two years.

 

Although the total holiday entitlement can be higher, if extra is given for long service, it cannot be lower.

 

The Working Time Regulations is your friend here:

 

The Working Time (Amendment) Regulations 2007 No. 2079

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right ok.. they are doing this to a lot of staff. They try and get out of it by saying our bank holiday is part of it.. im not sure. however i work weds, thurs and friday so i should still get 17 days regardless of what days i work??

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive been here oneof the longest mrshed, i was the 3rd person to be employed in the offices here. The lady who gets more holiday than me has worked here for less time and works shorter hours.. she kicked up a stink about not getting bank hols cos she does tues,weds thurs and they gave her 17 days. if she gets that we all should.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i work weds, thurs and friday so i should still get 17 days regardless of what days i work??

 

Correct.

There's only one way that I can think of that you could be entitled to less than 17 days and it's nothing to do with bank holidays.

If your Company uses 1st October 2008 - 30th September 2009 as their leave year; then for that period your holiday entitlement would be 16 days. (After which it would increase to 17 days.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i work weds, thurs and friday so i should still get 17 days regardless of what days i work??

 

Correct.

There's only one way that I can think of that you could be entitled to less than 17 days and it's nothing to do with bank holidays.

If your Company uses 1st October 2008 - 30th September 2009 as their leave year; then for that period your holiday entitlement would be 16 days. (After which it would increase to 17 days.)

EDIT Siorry misread.

 

However, bank holidays absolutely are counted as far as I am aware. You get a proportion of the bank holiday off depending upon what days and how many hours you work, and if you arent entitled to the full day you need to work some time in lieu....

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only legislation that I am aware of in regard to bank holidays is a requirement for banks to close on these days.

The recent increase to the statutory minimum paid holiday entitlement made no change to the status of bank holidays.

 

It is still entirely at the individual employers discretion whether or not to include bank and public holidays in their employees annual holiday entitlement.

An employee is entitled to the statutory minimum paid holiday entitlement regardless of which days of the week they work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

The statutory legal minimum holiday entitlement for a F/T employee working 5 days per week in the UK is now 28 days per annum (calculated as 5 days x 5.6 weeks =28) however employers can include bank holidays in this so many employers will say 20 personal days + 8 UK Bank holidays.

 

In the case of P/T employees I can advise you that where your holidays are calculated based on the amount of days you work per week (as opposed to the amount of hours) you would simply multiply the days worked by 5.6 (F/T Equiv calculation) - so MarieFab would as she says get 17 days...important to note the employer should round up to the nearest whole or half day.

 

Then with regards to the bank hols if your working days fall on a bank hol you will then minus them from this figure.

For example Marie Fab works Tues-Thurs, in England no bank hols fall on a Thurs this year so she will benefit by having the full 17 days for hols!

If she worked Mon-Weds however there are 5 bank hols (I think!) that fall on a Monday in England this year so she would have 17 days, less the 5 bank hols which fall on bank hols, leaving 12 days for her personal hols....but remember that she still gets paid for the bank hols anyway as it would be a standard working day normally!

 

I hope this makes sense, it can be confusing however, best to go to the business link web-site reffered to earlier! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all

 

That makes plenty of sense rebecca.

 

Just been told by my boss she needs to work out what i have (obviously i already know)

 

Will wait for them and see what they say then i will come back with the info i have picked up ont his site. I will also tell them ive spoken to an adviser at acas who have also confirmed it.. will be interesting to see how they try and wangle out of it - especially as one of the staff already gets her full 17 days (the bosses wife!)

 

Will let you know.

 

This site is a life saver!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...