Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

3rd debt collection attemped


m0cej
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4036 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This I recieved yester day from where the debt oriinally started from I worked for them but they dont seem to be listening? I sent a letter asking how could they buy the debt BACK off a DCA once they'de sold it... as its been passed to Cap quest to anothet company, then fredickson international, I basically said would they cancel it for me as I'de worked for them for 23 years and it was there fault ect... this is the letter I recieved

 

Thank you for your recent letter

 

we can confirm that we have sent a noctification of no further action to the relevant debt company, and removed the charges from your account your balance now stands at 354.00 instead of 528.00

 

I confirm that we have reset your payment for you at the rate of 10.00 per 28 days

 

all charges have been stopped however, if payments are late or missed charges will be added.

 

your first payment of 10.00 is due on the 23rd november

 

We hope this information is helpful

 

your sincerely

 

Blah blah blah

 

DO I PAY remember this where the debt originally started so cant understand how theyve bought it back...

 

What shall I reply with????

 

thanks for all the help

 

Darren

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If they have produced an agreement set up a standing order for a £1 a month, if no agreement send them nothing.

 

Assuning they have provided the agreement, send them a letter saying you are on benefits; this is the MINIMUM AMOUNT OF MONEY THE GOVERNMENT SAY YOU NEED TO LIVE ON, so you cannot afford to pay them anything, but you are prepared to show you are trying by making token monthly payments of a pound.

 

Do not use DD.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No Ive had no agreement off them, and they expect me to ring up and pay on my debit card or using a payment slip sent out to me every month.. Thats the way J.D.WILLIAMS&COMPANY do it and if you miss a payment then interest go on and its very high as well. They aint even produced my credit agreement yet????

 

Daz

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

This is what I recieved back J.D.Williams after sending a cca as they were just repeating themselves and kept sending payment slips to me until now... this is the letter

 

Thank you for letter undated (must have forgot but sent recorded) but recieved on the 19th novemberthe contents have been noted but

 

We are unable to locate a "True copy" of your credit agreement at this time.

 

I note you have recently contacted the CBA for advice in this matter I would confirm we have recently accepted a reduced payment of £10.00every 28 days on your ballance of £354.00 with a cancellation of interest charges. a letter has been sent explaining fully the terms and conditions of this plan.As a good will gesturewe wavered the usual arrangement fee.

 

I look forward to hearing from you soon as possible

 

yours sincerly blah blah blah

 

Could anyone advise on what to put in the letter I send back next

 

thanks for all the help

 

Daz

Link to post
Share on other sites

As said above - no agreement, do not pay!

 

Just write:

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I acknowledge receipt of your recent letter and wish to address its contents:

 

I have been advised that as you have admitted in writing your inability to produce a true copy of the original agreement that the alleged debt is wholly unenforceable under Section 127(3) of the Consumer Credit Act.

 

Accordingly, I shall be making no payment towards the alleged debt.

 

I would also remind you that as you are unable to produce evidence of a lawful agreement that you have no right to process my data and that I therefore require that you remove (with immediate effect) any negative information you may have added to my credit files as held by any credit reference agency.

 

I expect your written confirmation that any such data has been removed, and that whilst you are unable to produce evidence of a true copy of an agreement that is lawful under the aforementioned CCA 1974 that I shall receive no further communications from:

 

a) you

b) the original creditor

c) any other third party

 

Failure to meet the above request will result in complaints to all relevant authorities.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

XXXXXXXXXX

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi mOcej

 

shame you didnt ask us for advice on your employer getting rid of you in the employment section of the forum. As am sure you would have had grounds to take them to an employment tribunal for unfair dismissal on the grounds of disability discrimination due to the fact you needed major hospital treatment. which would have meant you would have been classed as having a disability until you recovered.

 

If your former employer is responsible for all the DCA's chasing you, then you should go seek advice from a solicitor (some offer free advice) and also mention the circumstance on how your employment ended with them aswell as the debts.

Edited by teaboy2
grammer/spelling

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

SORRY this is the 2nd letter...

This is what ive had since the letter I sent on the 10th december... Ive had 2 seperate ones. Its a notice of termination which states.. Depite previous reminders you have failed to keep to the agreed payment arrangement, you now risk this arrangement being cancelled.you must now make a payment withing 48 hour to avoid action being taken to recover the debt (theyde already done that see the beginning of my posts) to agree a suitable repayment.... As we no of any reason why your debt remains unpaidand there fore in line with the office of fair trading collection guidance we are notifying you of our rights to pass your account to a debt collection company "HEY" It already was until I contacted them my self "JD williams that is".. Its like they are just ignoring me....

 

**This is the 1st letter***

 

here is your jd williams credit account statement managed by Reliable collections it includes transaction upto18 dec 2009. You must pay the amount of 30.00 this includes an unpaid instalment of 20.00 Remember credit and administration charges will be incured until your arrangement is upto dateif your unable to pay please contact us on ---------- as we may be able to help.

 

This notice is given in compliance with the consumer credit act 1974 because you are behind with your payment under the agreement to discuss the state of your account please call us on ---------- this may help if you are experiencing problems in maintaining your payment...

And they include an office of fair trading leaflet

 

Its like they are paying no attention to what im writing but I dont know if these are just a computer gernerated letters or a direct reply for mine.But they still havent sent the credit agreement which they say they dont have a TRUE COPY of so whats my next step please as Im getting a little worried now?? especially if I have to end up paying the full ammount which I havent got??

 

sorry for the long post and once again thanks

 

Daz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear about all your hassle. Unfortunately it's all too familiar.

 

Of course these people are ignoring what you say. All they understand - and all they are interested in - is getting money from you.

 

Simply keep repeating that you will not make payments until a compliant credit agreement is produced. Each time you do this you are passing the ball back to them.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

JD Williams aka (un)Reliable Collections and the many catalogues they operate are well known for their failure to produce a valid agreement, but continue with their letters, phone calls and other persistent harassment.

 

ncf355 gave you a letter to send, ignore anything else they may throw at you until they respond to that. Don't talk to them on the phone as they have this annoying habit of forgetting half the conversation when they write it up on the screen and often put in things they think they may have heard, like an offer to pay.

 

Beware of one of their little tricks, they will often send out a credit agreement form that they ask you to sign and return to them - DO NOT sign or return it. It's a trap! Some people have been caught out by this, including a member of my family who then had to pay them an alleged debt, which had been paid in full at the time she bought goods. They added charges on to the account, hence the 'debt'. GGrrrrr

 

Did you ever sign a credit agreement for the account? Quite probably not, and even if you did, it must have been several years ago. I would have a side bet at the bookies that they can't find it...?

 

Having read the story, my personal letter to them would include a liberal application of sage and onion... If they cannot provide the agreement you signed then they've no chance of collecting a bean. BUT, you need to stop them in their tracks now, before they start passing the account to other DCA's.

 

Don't pay them, or any 'agent', anything. You've done what you need to do already if you've gone through the routine of requesting a copy of the agreement from a DCA, even if it's their own made-up one, and paid your £1 fee. They then had just 12+2 days to comply, after which time the matter becomes unenforceable and they should stop all action.

 

They can do nothing unless they take the matter to court, and your defence is that you have asked them for the paperwork to back up their claim that you own them anything at all, and they failed. They will not go in that direction unless they are 100% sure of their ground. From what we know already, they are doing nothing more than asking you to pay and ignoring your letters.

 

As long as you are making offers of payment, or agreeing to what they ask, they'll keep at you as they think they have you running scared. They rely heavily on intimidation to make you think they have any right to make these demands. You are the one making matters worse for yourself by asking them to reduce the amount and so on.

 

It's been out to DCA's and back again, you've done your bit, stop talking to them and do yourself a big favour?

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Ive not signed anything to do with a credit agreement, As I was a former employee and it was a staff account They finished me on ill health after 25 years,and said they would close and deduct all monies owd before my final cheque..They close my account as soon as I finished but must have forgot to deduct money. I moved soon after, as I had to sell my house because I couldnt afford it.. So I knew nothing about what they had fail to do until 12 months after.. As I was very poorly and a waiting a heart op, and it was least of my worries, I then recieved a letter from fredrickson international or one of the dca's companies plus another 2 besides... in each instance I requested a cca off everyone of them but all were unable to provide a copy.. so in desperation I written to my old employee's asking them to cancel the debt?? and they started then...so the story go's... and never agreed to pay them anything or refuse to speak to them on the phone as Im still very bitter with them finishing me ect.......

 

Thanks for all the advice

Daz

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Another letter

 

This one basically says they've tried to contact me with no joy?? Because of this one of the out comes may be court action!!!! how ever, if I contact them in the next 48 hours they are willing too take reduced payments BUT Ive still had no reply from the letter I sent on the 16/12/2009 Which is in my thread its like it just being ignored... Im getting abit scared now to be honest, as I thought they would have replied by now about the letter?? shall I send it again or should I send another letter if so what should I put in in Im no good at letters

 

thankyou ever so much for your help

 

Darren

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a reciept for as prove of the letter you sent earlier being sent, then just ignore their letters as it just another threatogram.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep I have the recorded delivery slip for the 16 december its just like they ignoring everything and with them mentioning about court action its a bit worrying ha but ive just check using track and trace and its still being processed for delivery??? from the 16th shall send it again???

 

Cheers Daz

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i would sent it again.

 

include a note explaining the failed delivery first time round along with a photo copy of the receipt for safe measure.

 

then wait for a response. but send recorded delivery again and check in 4 working days that its been sent. if the same happens again then it must mean they not signing for recorded letters and are refusing to accept them.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well what I think I did is Im recieving letter from reliable collections and jd willaim customer service dept.. The letterwhich said they havent got a true copy was jd william cust service dept so I will send it there as the reliable collections one (which the same company as I used to print them) is a Po box

Im getting confused as Im getting them off both...

 

regards Darren

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah, just send the a photo copy. basically saying no CCA...now F OFF in polite terms lol

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi heres the reply I got could someone please translate pleaes it from there legal dept

 

Dear Mr xxxxxxx

 

I have been asked to respond to you letter dated 16/12/2009 which I recieved on tyhe 13th of jan 2010

 

we have noted your dicision not to make any further payments to the account in the absence of a valid dipute over the componants that make up the balance of your account we consider your assertionthat you have no legal liability fpr payment to be based on purely on the fact that we are unable to provide you with a true copy of the credit agreement.

 

we will how ever continue to make all necessary searches to our records and will provide you with a true copy of your agreement as soon as it becomes available.

 

As it would appear that we are currently unable to locate a true copy of your cedit agreement.we are aware that under of the act we are unable to legally enforce this agreement against tou through the courts.

 

How ever in accordance with the case of Mcguffick v rbs (2009) EWHC 2386 (comms) (McGuffick) you should be aware that we are still entitled among other things, to recieve any payments due under the agreement and your obligations to maintain thoses payments continue . if you fail to maintain your payment obligations,we are entitiled to report your missed payments to licence credit reference agencies who will record that information for 6 years.This could make it difficult for you to obtain credit in the future as their records may be consulted by financial organisations to whom you subsequentlyapply for credit. We are entitled to take these steps because under McGuffick, none of these activities were deemed to amount to enforcement....

 

We reiterate that we willendeavour to comply with your request as soon as possible.

 

There is a statutory right under section 10 of the data protection act 1998(the act) to require a data contro.ller to stop processing data. A common misconception is that this grants a data subject a general right to prevent a data controller from ligitimately processing that subject data .The act provides no such general right. provided we process data in compliance with the data protection principals in the act you may only request we cease processing where ;-

 

a( The processing is likely to cause damage or distress or

 

B) Where the purpose of the processing is for DIRECT MARKETING

 

We are not satified that you meet the tests set out in section 10 of the act to establish a right under (a) above especially as it is our case that you have previously consented to such processing as we carried out and /or the processing is in furtherance to a contract entered into at your request) there is a ballance outstanding on your account which is due and the processing of your account data will reflect that.we will accept your section 10 notice in respect of Direct Marketing only and we will now make arrangement to cease processing your data FOR THAT PURPOSE ONLY There may be pipeline mailings already selected for you which are in the course of dispatch which we can not now stop as these may be with a third parties but these will cease shortly

 

yours sincerly blah blah blah

 

Do I send anything back at all to this letter they never give up..... thanks for all your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter is a load of hogwash. The only paragraph of any importance is

 

As it would appear that we are currently unable to locate a true copy of your cedit agreement.we are aware that under of the act we are unable to legally enforce this agreement against tou through the courts.

 

Personally I would file this away and ignore their begging letters

Link to post
Share on other sites

From day one they've been bluffing. They can't do anything. They are bullies who know you owe nothing (which I believe is the case) but don't let that stop them from hoping they can guilt trip a basically decent human being into paying a debt through a mixture of shame, fear and conscience.

 

You've been treated abominably but the facts are (and correct me if I'm wrong)

 

  • You were sacked while sick and could have a case against your firm.
  • They took money from your redundancy payment to settle any outstanding balance
  • They did not notify you of any error in subtracting a balance therefore there was probably no such error
  • They they relied on you not knowing your rights to bully you

Nice people aren't they?

 

As you hopefully now know...

 

  • They can't come to your home and take anything.
  • They will lie to get their payments
  • They will take advantage of someone in a vulnerable situation
  • You don't have to pay them anything. They have never even attempted to prove the debt.

Relax, the only thing they can do is issue empty threats. They can't take it to court all they can do is try to scare you. You now know your rights. Therefore you can't be scared.

 

All the best!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose so... but the original debt was from a staff account! when they finished me they would do the deductions for money i owed the company and close my staff account as soon as the deductions were made... but at the time I was very poorly and just took the final cheque and thought no more of it until the first debt company got in touch...... So they must forgot to take the money I suppose but I wasnt to know that as I moved 6 months later and I couldnt access my account as it was closed.....

 

regards Darren

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...