Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So sorry it's took me a few weeks to respond back to you. Thank you so much for your response. My grandfather is clear about the pension deductions on his pay slips.  As I mention before all these went missing in the burgarly. We have tried Willis Tower Watson but they were not to helpful. I am stuck what we can try next. Thank you again.     
    • As a rough guess it would be your landlord who would be responsible. But you need to understand the extent of your losses before you can begin any claim. This means that you need to list out any expenses to which you have been put, any expenses which would be associated with repairing damage or cleaning et cetera. And then list out the inconvenience to which you have been put as a result of this. Any actual expenses – money loss which has been incurred already all that is likely to be incurred in result of repairs will need an inspection and to quotations which eventually you will present to the landlord. Even if I'm wrong and it is not the landlord – you will still need the evidence that I have listed above in order to begin any claim.  
    • Hi, I have been renting a three bedroom, top floor flat for six years now in England. Just so you know, there is a letting agent, landlord and a block management company involved. Eighteen months ago we had a considerable leak in one of the bedrooms, affecting the next door bedroom as well but not as badly. This led to a lot of damage to the ceiling and the formation of mould within the first bedroom and to a lesser extent in the second bedroom. As far as we are aware, the leak has only recently been sorted by the block management company(who owns the roof etc…) Just over three weeks ago, a large inspection hole was cut into the ceiling, the workmen (instructed to come by block management) who undertook the work did not put any dust sheets down over any of the furniture, causing an incredible amount of dirt and debris throughout the entire flat, rendering the room unusable. We were left on a Friday afternoon with a gaping hole and no instruction as to what was going to happen next. Only after contacting our letting agent to inform them about the state of the bedroom had been left in, with a gaping hole and bits of debris falling, did they come to do a temporary fix to cover the hole which was after a week. As the bedroom is still unusable. My daughter has for more than three weeks been sleeping in the lounge. The letting agent did offer to get the place cleaned, but we see no point until the job has been completed. My landlord has reduced my rent by £200 for the past couple of months and is now wanting full rent regardless of the work being incomplete. A plan has been put in place, however, we have not been given a timeline for when these will be completed and this could take some considerable time. In addition to this, there was a leak in the kitchen but this was very minor, and we have a major condensation issue in the bathroom as the extractor fan is apparently not strong enough so the ceiling is covered in mould which is now being revealed as the paint is flaking off. The problem we have is that the building (roof etc..) is managed by a block management company. My letting agent has basically said that the damage is the responsibility of the block management and this nothing to do with the landlord, and therefore, does not want to give us any compensation. What are my rights as a tenant in this situation? Am I entitled to a continued rent reduction or additional compensation given the ongoing uninhabitable condition of the bedroom and the disruption this has caused? I have attached photos as supporting evidence and would be very grateful for your advice. https://imgur.com/a/yfm4FP9 Should you require any further information, please let me know. Thanks in advance! 😁👍
    • I have just read it again and I see that you say that you are going to be claiming for time and stress. This is not recoverable loss so I think that you should leave it out.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TPS Parking Solutions Limited **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5314 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Even though their last letter obviously doesn't warrant a response, I thought it would be discourteous to ignore it ....

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Disputed Parking Invoice: 0226090916001

I acknowledge receipt of your letter dated October 16, 2009.

 

I note that despite repeated requests, you have been unable to provide any credible authority confirming the registered keeper of a vehicle being liable under your contract with Jempsons, and am therefore of the view that none exists.

 

As I have previously indicated, I do not drive the vehicle in question. It is a pool car used by different employees of our business. I am not currently aware of who was using the vehicle on September 16, 2009. While I have absolutely no obligation to provide you with details of the driver, I will endeavour to obtain these subject to being properly reimbursed for my time. I estimate this will take at least one hour, for which my charging rate is £95.

 

If you wish me to make further enquires please submit your remittance in the sum of £235, being £95 for my time together with the two attached unpaid invoices totalling £140, to the above address. Once your cheque has cleared I will use my best endeavour to obtain the driver’s information.

 

Until such time as I receive the payment outlined above, I will be unable to assist you further and remind you, whilst writing, that further frivolous demands will incur an administration charge in accordance with our existing agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Must be my lucky day - TPS Parking have decided to waive the penalty that they were never entitled to.

 

I'd be interested if anyone here knows on what basis a member of the public is not allowed to write to the director of a company at his home address, particularly when the company concerned is in the business of retrieving addresses from databases itself and then sending bogus invoices and threats!

 

scan0004.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Must be my lucky day - TPS Parking have decided to waive the penalty that they were never entitled to.

 

I'd be interested if anyone here knows on what basis a member of the public is not allowed to write to the director of a company at his home address, particularly when the company concerned is in the business of retrieving addresses from databases itself and then sending bogus invoices and threats!

 

scan0004.jpg

 

Ha ha ha ha.

 

All I can say is, if you don't like it, don't dish it out TPS. All bullies are cowards - it never changes. Congratulations SpitFire650 on getting your pretend parking penalty overturned.

 

Regards,

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - I was bit surprised how easily these parasites accepted the reality of the situation.

 

I guess you can make them back off if you make enough of a nuisance of yourself!

 

I think you clearly demonstrated to them that you are not a mug and would not be paying their parking charge. Once a PPC have realised this then there is little point in carrying on. All this gesture of good will business is just a euphamism for "we give up".

 

With regards to writing to their director I see it like this. You were failing to get a satisfactory response by writing to the company; therefore, you obtained the Director's address (easily accessible via Companies House) and wrote to him directly with your issues. This seems to be a perfectly reasonable thing to do.

 

In response to their "we will start legal proceedings" nonsense my reply would be - for what? lol :)

 

It has got me thinking though - perhaps we should have a photo hall of fame for all PPC king pins.

 

Regards,

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that would be a good idea, with a photo, home address, email address and mobile number, if known.

 

Would you like to start the thread? I'll add these two clowns!

 

Its time to fight back against this kind of exploitation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a nice email from him too:

 

Without prejudice

The notice was cancelled as a goodwill gesture and was never issued invalid, you were issued a ticket as the registered keeper. We are happy to attend court if required. We also reserve the right to charge administration, legal and any other cost associated with your case including harassment from this point on.

Yours Sincerely,

 

TPS Parking Solutions Ltd

Central Processing Office

TPS UK

PO Box 7135

Kettering

NN16 6BP

]E: [email protected]

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

An email from him as well - tell him no more communication otherwise you will begin legal proceedings lol lol.

 

Again, well done my friend.

 

Best Regards,

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that would be a good idea, with a photo, home address, email address and mobile number, if known.

 

Would you like to start the thread? I'll add these two clowns!

 

Its time to fight back against this kind of exploitation.

 

Look at this lot at Town and City, they've got more directors than a FTSE 100 company lol.

 

Town and City Parking - Taking care of parking

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at this lot at Town and City, they've got more directors than a FTSE 100 company lol.
Why not? Like pigs at the trough.

 

Couple of them look like they were straight out of prison when the pictures were taken - which is where they probably belong.

 

It appears that pirates like this also "police" the mother and baby spaces at the supermarket, rather than the proper authorities, which is handy to know as they are always close to the entrance and a bit wider which avoids some oik banging their door into your car!

Edited by spitfire650
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm helping a chap I know deal with this outfit. They ticketed him at a supermarket for parking in a disabled bay. He is in fact disabled but forgot to display his badge. He's embarked on the ignore route; however, I will be collecting some photo's on his behalf. The signage is very interesting to say the least. It talks about Civil Penalty Notices and says nothing about entering in to a contract to park. I think they are on very flimsy ground. That said, I have never heard of Town and City taking court action.

 

Motley bunch aren't they? I think there might be a touch of job overlapping going on with all those people. I like the fact that the MD was an investment banker - it seems only natural that he should move in to an industry like private parking :grin:

 

Regards,

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't supposed they have explained on what authority they are issuing the ticket?

 

How can they impose a penalty if he actually is disabled but forgot the badge - at the end of the day he was still entitled to be in the space, and wasn't depriving anyone that was entitled to use it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks for that - the author of that article knows his stuff. I feel like calling the cops regarding the TPS posstops - there's a breach of the Administration of Justice Act there that could do with investigating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't supposed they have explained on what authority they are issuing the ticket?

 

How can they impose a penalty if he actually is disabled but forgot the badge - at the end of the day he was still entitled to be in the space, and wasn't depriving anyone that was entitled to use it.

 

I know, I might post up a picture of the sign for us all to have a chuckle. You get a generous 3 hours to use the store - I don't know about the rest of you but I can't handle 30 mins in a store, let alone 3hrs. Interestingly, before ASDA introduced this company, their parking area was never more than half full, even on the very busiest days. There was simply no need to use them in the first place. Add to this, there were never any issues of abandoned cars either.

 

Perhaps they issue their Civil Penalty Notices under ther Planet Perky Private Parking Act :grin:.

 

Regards,

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like calling the cops regarding the TPS posstops - there's a breach of the Administration of Justice Act there that could do with investigating.

 

Find out who the Inspector is at your local station and write to him explaing not just what has happened but also the implications of it and why it must be investigated. Have a look through your paperwork and see if you can find any breaches of the Fraud Act 2006 aswell.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...