Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paint is a free programme on any Windows PC. But don't worry, the choice here is not either perfection or nothing. As you say, use your scanner, save the file ... and then use the "choose files" option when you post to CAG to add the file. We can do all the redacting and converting to the correct file type at this end.  The important thing is just to get the info to us. Why not do an experiment this afternoon and see if the above works?  
    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
    • Right that's exactly why so many drivers got caught, it had been that way for many years then suddenly changes with no warning
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Home Insurance Claims turns into Cheque Fraud nightmare


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5304 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I made an insurance claim in April 2009 for a damaged PC, my insurers name is Assurant Solutions which was previously called D&D Homecare. I made a few calls and was told that a local agent would visit my property and assess the claim. On the 20.05.09 the agent came and processed the details and said I should expect a cheque within 2 weeks...great I thought! Two weeks came and went and I called back, I was told it was in the post and to still expect it, another call made with the same outcome the week after. Later that month I got a voicemail asking me to get back in contact... turns out it had been cashed already. I explained that it wasn't me that did it and that it never got to my address, I was told that there was nothing that could be done about it and that they didn't know what to do about it really, I was told that I would need to take it up with the police and the postal service (I thought they would be the ones who were responsible for this action and not me). I spoke to another few advisors and eventually it got escalated to a woman called Maxine who was a Manager in the contact center, she needed copies of my bank statements for the times when the cheque was cashed to prove that it wasn't me - I sent these twice as the first ones couldn't be found at their office, even though they had been signed for via recorded delivery. I was told that a trace would need to be done now that I had proven that it wasn't in my bank account and that they would see whom was responsible for cashing it etc. a 6 week timescale was given for this trace. 6 weeks came and went, I made several calls to which I was continually told that Maxine was dealing with it and that I will just have to wait (I had been expecting the money and loaned it from someone else while I waited on the cheque all this time, I still owe this money out!!) I got another voicemail this week from Maxine asking me to call in again, I did so and was asked Do you live alone? yes i replied, she then said that the cheque had been cashed in a store of Harvey and Thompson pawnbrokers, Maxine said that as far as they are concerned it has been cashed under my name using identification of mine... I asked if there was any confirmation of this anywhere or if they had contacted this company to request details about the cheque, where it was cashed, what branch it was etc. Maxine told me that I would have to contact this company and find out for myself, I said that it would be impossible for me to do such a thing as it would be a breech of data protection for H&T to give me info like that - this was duly ignored, Maxine continued to say that it must have been cashed by me or someone with my identification - I felt like I was being called a liar and a criminal in an effort to make me drop my claim for this money, in frustration I then contacted the pawnbrokers and after being transferred through a few different departments I spoke to a manager called Sam who said that there was very little information she could give me due to Data Protection, she did however confirm that no one using my name or registered to my address had any activity within any of their branches within 2009 relating to cheque cashing. Sam said that my insurance company would have to enter into written correspondence to confirm what they had just told me, that my insurer would also have to give them give them details of the cheque which they will then investigate and respond back with further information on where and who it was cashed by. She also said that it would have to be reported as fraudulent activity to the police by themselves and my insurer (I thought my insurer should have already also done this by now) I have since contacted Assurant again and was told that they already had the head office address and were going to go ahead with the correspondence!! Why was iI asked to contact them myself if they already had the details of their head office?? Anyway this is as far as its got so far.

 

Its now Four and a half months since I made my claim, the cheque was for £650. I have made numerous calls and each time feel helpless at the end of it, I've received some of the worst customer service experiences of my life calling this company. I now fear that this cycle may never end until I give in and count the money as lost.

 

Can anyone help or offer advice.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either threaten your insurers with the small claims court and/or the newspapers if you are not in receipt of the money within 14 days. I would say that until you receive the money, the sender is responsible for any mishap. Small claims court probably the best. Send your letter recorded and give them 14 days to get the money to you before you proceed with the claim in the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...