Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, so just been to see my friend, she still has her head firmly in the sand and had a pile of unopened post, thankfully nothing serious apart from this case!    In answer to your question it says N24 General Directions Order at the bottom of the page, then on page 2 where the line says "As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) " this is N271 Notice of transfer of proceedings.  Within the stack of letters I found 2 from Kearns Solicitors,    02-12-2022 Document pack with covering letter stating under the s78 CCA please see enclosed  1) A copy of the executed Credit Agreement, 2)  A copy of the terms & conditions 3) A copy of the varied terms & conditions applicable at termination / assignment, and  4) A statement regarding the conduct of your account as requested by s78(1)(a) to (c)  (Would you like me to describe the documents attached?)   18-02-2023 Generic letter asking for her to contact them to discuss settlement or they will take to court for further legal action. 
    • well you made the cardinal sin by phoning these scammers at least once so their persistence could go on. however you are new so there you go. you never ever ever phone any of these likes of scammers on these fake schemes that seem plausible.  just like a DCA chasing any old debt .. they are NOT BAILIFFS and have  ZERO legal powers to actually do anything. dx  
    • Okay understood now just based on personal experience how long does this go on for 
    • civil recovery schemes run by the likes of RLP DWF etc etc are a scam. totally IGNORE EVERYTHING. no if's or but's dx  
    • I’m 17 years old and Received 2 letters from dwf with my name spelt wrong and they are asking for for £230.40. I rang dwf civil recovery the first time upon taking advice from citizens advice to explain to delay to deadline as I was in the process of receiving advice which wasn’t much help. When that deadline was done I then called again to delay the deadline as I’m struggling financially and it’s lot of money they are asking for and I tried to dispute the cost to which they said okay we will delay it another 7 days for you to dispute the cost but I asked them how do I dispute this to you or Sainsbury’s and they said “we can’t advise you on this matter” I’ve read a lot of threads saying to ignore them but I was unsure now as I’ve made contact and have tried to dispute the payment and pay it which might mean I have admitted. Would they just persist harder and take me to court eventually or file for a ccj.   I would like to ignore them still but I would like to send a strong email so they know I’m clued up and then ignore them. I also want to pay the reasonable amount and get this matter solved. any advice on the law or similar situations are helpful when I called them I asked for an itemised bill. £101 stolen goods  ( supposedly caught me because they watched me on cctv over the duration of the week) also why did they not stop me in the first day. £20.40 recovered goods £150 security costs     Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot Financial - Credit Report Entry.


andi2003
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5221 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

Today its offically a year since I asked for a copy of my CCA.

As previous posts of mine state they have now admitted that they are not going to chase the debt because of this,The SAR which they sent does not include a CCA or an agreement to process my data, but they still process my data and state that they have a right to because of a history of payments acknowledging the debt (to them token payments).

Can someone please give me advise as to what to do next, ie direct me in the line of what claim to make, what I can / cant claim, also other posts mention about writing to the CRA's about manual entries, how does that effect obtaining credit?

All info is much appreciated.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought Andi, but could you not in the first instance send Cabot a letter (recorded of course) and cc the CRA's that you do not acknowledge the debt and that by way of backing up this ackowledgement you haven't made any payments to them since 12+ months ago....also enclose copies of where they'd sent you notification that they don't have anything either re paperwork and add a further explantory note to the CRA re the removal of whatever it is you're wanting gone?

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Proof of payment doesn't prove a debt - you didn't know at the time there was no lawful agreement for this alleged debt, you now know you shouldn't have been paying it and that is why it is in dispute. Proof of transactions ie statements showing you spending the money, is what a court looks for as supplementary proof that you incurred the debt.

 

CRAs will not do anything unless a bank/DCA tells them to do so - that is the agreement they have, even if you push all the evidence under the sun up their noses that proves otherwise. Cabot clearly won't move on this, so you have two options open to you. The first is to complain to the ICO giving them all the evidence you have proving the default entries are both unlawful and inaccurate. You will see on the ICO's Technical Guidance on filing default entries what their criteria are. The fact there is not a scrap of paper proving this alleged debt even exists is a good start. They will investigate it but they are slow in getting started. The second option is to take Cabot to court and ask for a court order to have the default removed.

 

I am currently going through the ICO against 2 banks (3 accounts) for removal of defaults. If that doesn't work, I am going to court and I have spent myriads of hours drawing up the cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read your post above Pinky (post 22) very interesting and I sincerely wish you luck, I'm a little behind you with some of mine but just reading your post makes me realise that none of us are alone, we all seem to be on the same path albeit at varying distance up the way....

 

But it's good to see yours in writing, very insightful, have a slap to the back (aka a reputation thingy)

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well at least I would if I could, it says I gots to pass some around before I can give you some more, ....how rude! (I gave you one.....as in a reputation that is...last week, must of been the last person I gave it to.

Do you itch? :D

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ive had a reponse from the Information Commissioners Office, they have said that they would not consider any action as the matter is over 12mths old!! Despite the fact that I already brought it to there attention in May and they gave me a refrence number for the complaint.

Looks like a dead end there. What do I need to do now, should I write back to the ICO? Its over a year now and im getting quite p***ed off with the fact I cant even open a bank account cos of this entry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see no alternative but to go to court and ask for an order against Cabot to remove the default on the grounds you never at any time gave them permission to pass your personal data to credit reference agencies - and ask for general damages for loss in that it has prevented you from opening a bank account and damaged your reputation (about £1500 - Kpoharor V Woolich 2006). That's as far as I go I'm afraid because I know nothing of the English legal system (Scots Law which I come under is different). If you go over to the legal forum they will tell you what forms to get and how to fill them out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Little are you saying that im screwed and dont have a chance of getting anything sorted on this?

 

Can some one direct me to the relevant link regarding the legal forum, as Im at work and have very limited internet access allowance.

 

Sorry for length absence - in and out of hospital.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...