Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

signed off work due to operation - received letter to attend interview under caution for fraud!


sorrylittlelot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5342 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I need some advice I am so mad!

 

I had a knee reconstruction on June 4th and have been signed off work via Doctors, I am due to see my specialist today for a check up.

Coincedently my sik note expires today.

 

What do I do?

 

Mad is not the word, everytime I pass my jobcentre there are alcoholics drinking cand of lager etc outside just before they go and sing on.

 

Seems to me that being honest with them gets me in trouble.

 

 

Any advice?

Edited by sorrylittlelot
.

I'm worse at what I do best and for this gift I feel blessed

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's really not enough information to answer your question - indeed, I'm not entirely sure what your question is.

 

You are claiming, what, ESA? Or JSA? What fraud is suspected? Did you make the Jobcentre aware of your health condition when it happened?

 

Not to sound abrupt, it's just that we'd need to know more in order to offer any advice.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got to agree with Antone here, you don't really give us enough info.

 

When is the interview? Surely not today if you only got the letter today?

 

Simplest case is: You go to the interview and you take with you all documentary evidence and when the interview is over, you leave. Why getting your knickers in a twist? :-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to explain more:

 

I was on JSA from November 2008 due to redundancy, On June 6th 2009 I had a knee reconstruction - which the jobcentre knew of weeks before, following there advice I put my claim for ESA in the day before my operation.

I have been receiving ESA since that date as I have been signed off by my doctor/specialist.

Around 3 weeks ago I had to go to a Jobcentre medical assement where the Doctor looked at my knee for aprrox 5 seconds, then asked me questions for the next 20 mins. The questions seemed random to me, for example, what do I make my sun for breakfast, what hand do I right with/? What do I watch on TV in the evening.

 

Since the assesment I have not heard anything other than that my ESA has changed from Contribution based to Income based or vice versa, so I no longer get housing benefit and have to pay £800 back in overpayment.

As I say I received a letter yesterday saying "We have arranged this interview because we believe there are grounds for suspecting that you may have committed a criminal offence in relation to a benefit claim"

That is all the info I have, I called the jobcentre and they cannot give me anymore info and the persion who signed the letter is on holiday until Monday.

My interview is WEdnesday 16th.

 

I am "getting my knickers in a twist" as I have done nothing wrong what so ever, I have genuine doctor notes, so I am not worried, just more frustrated that I see people who get the benefits no questions asked when it is clear they have no intention of getting a job.

 

I guess my question(s) is thus,

What happens now? Will my benefits be stopped until they have interviewed me etc as my doctor has signed me off for a further 4 weeks today.

I'm worse at what I do best and for this gift I feel blessed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but for all you know, they think they have good grounds... like a friendly neighbour phoning them to say there's nothing wrong with you... Who knows?

 

IF the suspicion is because of the change from JSA to ESA, then you'll have to point out that a) you did this on the JC advice, and b) you're worse off now than you were before, so that would be the stupidest fraud attempt EVER :rolleyes:.

 

Incidentally, can you appeal that change in your classification?

 

It's been a long time since I was on benefits, but they didn't use to stop them before the investigation, only if they were convinced at the interview that you were guilty (or you admitted to it) and they would tell you there and then, but things might have changed. Common sense says they shouldn't stop them until the investigation is over, but the DSS and common sense don't always go hand in hand. :-(

 

Good luck, let us know what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I have sp[oken with jobcentre today and they say my payments will continue as normal.

 

I'm just confused as to why all of a sudden I have this interview, even though I have been signed off by a specialist and have no gaps what so ever since my operation.

My personal opinion is that it is a result from my medical assesment I had through the jobcentre, where the doctor bent my leg and looked at the swelling, that was the extent of the physical examination.

I guee my frustration is coming from the sense of not knowing.

I think they should tell you ssomething about the suspisions so you are able to prepare your defence.

I'm worse at what I do best and for this gift I feel blessed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but where would be their fun in that? :rolleyes:

 

DH is off work with hernia op, I have been faithfully bringing sick notes and updates to his work. Also dropped form for mortgage insurance last week asking them to send it back asap.

 

What came through the post yesterday? Not the insurance forms, that's for sure, no, instead, he has to traipse all the way into London next week for a work medical, less than 2 weeks after an op which has currently a 12-15 cm scar around his belly-button. :rolleyes: Oh, and his job involves heavy lifting. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...