Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA Again.


DOZY
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5375 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have taken an advisor on (free on legal aid), He sent some CCA,s out but only one reply to date , all it contained was records of purchases, letters were sent out 12 or more days ago, my advisor thinks its a better option to go for the kill, IE: a write on health grounds , he has received my medical report from my doctor, and he says it should be enough, to persuade them to write my debts off.

 

But I am thinking would,nt it be a lot easier to do the CCA thing , and see how many of the debts are valid any more.

Then dismiss those debts.

 

If they cannot produce CCA,s , what would the next step be, and depending on replys received take it to the next stage, which is ?? .

 

Is a write off, of debts legal or not , just admitting you owe the money ,but cannot pay it for whatever reasons you give , and that the debts will always be still there, I have heard the creditors pass on debt to another company just as the door is closing on them.

 

Please advice, i know i have an advisor , but I need cheering up!!.

 

dozy

Link to post
Share on other sites

No agreement (that contains the prescribed terms and is executed properly) means unenforceable debt.....although some will try and take you to court in the hope you won't know your rights and legal position....and don't forget that whilst in default the debt is unenforceable...

 

Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations

1983 (SI 1983/1569)

2 Prescribed period

The period of 12 working days is hereby prescribed for the purposes of each provision of the Act specified in Column 1

of the Schedule to these Regulations relating to the duty indicated in Column 2 in relation to regulated agreements

 

 

SCHEDULE

SECTIONS OF THE ACT IN RESPECT OF WHICH A PERIOD OF 12 WORKING DAYS IS PRESCRIBED RELATING TO DUTIES IN

RELATION TO REGULATED AGREEMENTS

Regulation 2

Section of the

Act

Duty

(1) (2)

77(1) Duty to give information to debtor under fixed-sum credit agreement.

78(1) Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement.

79(1) Duty to give information to hirer under consumer hire agreement.

and section 78 for running credit

 

 

78.

Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement.

— (1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of [F1 £1], shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

(a)

the state of the account, and

 

(b)

the amount, if any currently payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor, and

 

©

the amounts and due dates of any payments which, if the debtor does not draw further on the account, will later become payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor.

 

 

(2) If the creditor possesses insufficient information to enable him to ascertain the amounts and dates mentioned in subsection (1)©, he shall be taken to comply with that paragraph if his statement under subsection (1) gives the basis on which, under the regulated agreement, they would fall to be ascertained.

 

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to—

(a)

an agreement under which no sum is, or will or may become, payable by the debtor, or

 

(b)

a request made less than one month after a previous request under that subsection relating to the same agreement was complied with.

 

 

(4) Where running-account credit is provided under a regulated agreement, the creditor shall give the debtor statements in the prescribed form, and with the prescribed contents—

(a)

showing according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer, the state of the account at regular intervals of not more than twelve months, and

 

(b)

where the agreement provides, in relation to specified periods, for the making of payments by the debtor, or the charging against him of interest or any other sum, showing according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer the state of the account at the end of each of those periods during which there is any movement in the account.

 

 

(5) A statement under subsection (4) shall be given within the prescribed period after the end of the period to which the statement relates.

 

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a)

he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with all the above..it would be far better to get the full info on each account before proceeding to attempt write off on health grounds. Banks being banks, they'll always want you to give them Xtra...so try giving them a case based on an invalid/missing CCA PLUS strong medical evidence and hopefully they'll be more liable to capitulate.

Good luck with it :)

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

Its Dozy again , i have just received the first cca from my advisor , its one i thought i would get sharpish from nat west bank, I will look at it very closely later and the dates as i see them , are that advisor posted cca request on the 24 th august,and was received by nat west on the 25th august, the letter advising me of this cca from advisor was sent on the 14th september, but it doe,s not state what date they received the cca from nat west.

 

Also advisor states they are awaing a responce to a waiver of the account (health).

 

what do you see in this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Its Dozy again , i have just received the first cca from my advisor , its one i thought i would get sharpish from nat west bank, I will look at it very closely later and the dates as i see them , are that advisor posted cca request on the 24 th august,and was received by nat west on the 25th august, the letter advising me of this cca from advisor was sent on the 14th september, but it doe,s not state what date they received the cca from nat west.

 

Also advisor states they are awaing a responce to a waiver of the account (health).

 

what do you see in this[/quote

 

Hi Again

 

Just confirmed that all the CCA,s are in default except i presume nat west,more than 12 days .

thus

 

"advisor"

It has been more than 12 working days since the request was made to the creditors. This means that they are unable to enforce the agreements until they provide/repsond to this request.

 

dozy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Again

 

Sorry on looking at advisors email it says,

 

It has been more than 12 working days since the request was made to the creditors. This means that they are unable to enforce the agreements until they provide/repsond to this request..

 

So that even nat west was out of time , but i now have the cca ,now what ??

 

dozy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Again

 

Sorry on looking at advisors email it says,

 

It has been more than 12 working days since the request was made to the creditors. This means that they are unable to enforce the agreements until they provide/repsond to this request..

 

So that even nat west was out of time , but i now have the cca ,now what ??

 

dozy

depends..if the agreement is enforceable in a court of law then you would be best trying to come to some arrangement to pay...if unenforceable then...well it is up to you, without an enforceable agreement all they can do is harrass you to try and get money out of you...remember only a court can ORDER you to pay

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should also perhaps consider making a subject access request to these people, their are many routes to establishing the validity of the debt. If the credit agreement is enforceable the next step maybe to see if any of your accounts have been issued a default notice and if so careful consideration should be given to these also, and then if applicable the termination notice and going on from there the possible assignment of the debts. The enforceability of the initial credit agreement is just one hurdle the creditor/dca has to jump in proving the debt...

Edited by Deb T

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...