Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
    • Hands up in the fact that i have probably F***** *P!!
    • Car Finance Awards celebrates best of the industryView the full article
    • I want to add my 2 cents here...  The purchase of this debt, Perch Group dont absolve themselves of liabilities from the Original Creditor. They should be responsible for dealing with this complaint in response to an Irresponsible Lending dispute.  If the balance is disputed as such in that way - Then they should be referring to the Original Creditor where applicable.    Also if your complaint was written in a way where a template wasnt used or it was rewritten to a similar effect where it wasnt recognisable - Then you probably would have stood a better opportunity at it not getting rebuffed.  To be honest those - Perch and TM Legal are a waste of Oxygen and will say anything to get you to pay.    Ditto on the template. Where did you find it?  Please keep in mind we have to unravel what you have done till now and help build a formal response.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA Loan - The battle begins


exchange
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks for spotting another error, albeit minor! Dotty50 has spotted that the 'Total Amount Payable' is slightly different, i.e. 13p, to the monthly payment figure times the term, in MBNA's favour of course!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Dotty50, no facility to add a document to PM's in the same way as you can here! The transfer fee of £50 is included in the 'Total Amount Payable' and the first months instalment. It has not been added to the 'Total Credit Charge for Your Loan'. Appears no interest has been calculated on the transfer charge. Hope that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just PM'd you again Dotty50. Thanks for looking into this. I don't mind you posting your findings but I feel I need further confirmation. I'm wondering if 4 months and not 3 makes all the fifference for the defrred period. 8.02% compared to 7.9% is too close to what I believe is a margin for error allowed of 0.1%. Any views on this from anyone else welcome.

 

As for Mandy Reeks, they do seem to have some odd surnames up in Chester!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bugger, just found the answer in that a tolerance of -0.1% is allowed and +1.0%! So even though I have been quoted 7.9% MBNA or any lender could put 7.8% or 8.9% and still be OK. Not impressed by the wide upward margin for error. Hohum!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any opinions on the enforceability of this agreement? I suspect it is OK but would like to hear from anyone who has looked into an MBNA loan agreement before and especially where it is one that has been topped up more than once.

Edited by exchange
attachment didn't work
Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH]12889[/ATTACH]

 

Here is the Loan agreement. If the sums are OK the it is probably enforceable. Problem is none of the figures seem to be correct so far!

 

I'll try adding the agreement this way then!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been digging on this site and seems the term 'Cash advance' should be 'Amount of credit'. Trying to get some answers before the next payment is due in just over a week, which I will struggle to pay. Just look at the exchange rate sterling to euro and you will perhaps understand why, as I am in euroland but paid in sterling. Seemed like a good idea at the time:(.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This website is brilliant. I feel relatively confident that all my debts that I have questioned so far are potentially unenforceable and that it is well worth fighting. I would not have survived financially until now without the help and knowledge of the people on here and look forward to the day when I am in a position to donate something to help keep this site alive. Just felt like posting this at this stage!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crucial part as I see it for lots of us is that it says they couldn't produce the original agreement. If this means they were relying on a copy then MBNA are going to struggle to enforce agreements.

Anyone know how to find out if a journalist has got this right for a change? Sorry, but journalists have a habit of getting things wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...