Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Daft question - but you filed the defence on-line on MCOL as dx indicated, right?
    • We looked up the e-mail address so communications would be in writing.  If you do stuff on the phone the other party can just deny the contents of the conversation.  They can't deny what's written in an e-mail. So time to sort Pete out.  Check the following for accuracy and change anything I've got wrong.  Then e-mail Pete this evening.  I was thinking of threatening the pub with legal action but let's initially be nice.   Dear Pete, Re: PCN no.XXXXX, claim form no.XXXXX on 23 July 2022 I was a customer at your pub and I attach proof of purchase. I was picking up my cousin Ms XXXXX and her family as she was working as a cook with you at the time.  I entered the pub through the back door, went to the bar, and ordered a drink and a meal.  At no point did any bar staff alert me that I needed to add my registration number or did I see any signs advising me to do so.  I then took a seat outside in a small seated area so I could chat to my cousin while waiting for her to finish work.  We were joined by the management of the pub and bar staff during my time waiting  I was shocked a few days later when I received a demand for £100 from Civil Enforcement Ltd.  i contacted the pub and was told "don't worry, it's not enforceable". Well, that information turned out to be nonsense because I have now received a county court claim form from CEL. I contacted the pub again on XXXXX and was extremely disappointed to be told "there's nothing we can do". Of course there is something you can do.  You are the organ grinder.  You called CEL in.  You can call your dogs off.  Your pub has absolutely superb reviews on Google Maps regarding the way in which you treat guests.  Do you really think customers should be dragged to court?  I'm sure you don't. I am therefore requesting that you intervene and instruct CEL to cease court action. Yours, XXXXX
    • Thank you - Defence has now been filed Doc_20240501_182920_Redacted.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

6hrs later,still struggling... **Stat demand set aside won with costs**


harvie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4578 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Capquest at it again!!!

 

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ACCEPT A "no costs" order - if the SD is set aside (which it probably will be) you have the RIGHT to costs at the litigant in person rate of £9.25 per hour - that includes letters, research, travel, attendance at court etc. EVERYTHING!

 

DON'T let Capquest (Barry Davies by any chance?) bully you into thinking you cannot claim costs. I recently had the same thing and WON £175 costs against them!

 

Here's the thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/215740-martin-capquest-statutory-demand.html

 

I can upload a copy of the letter I sent to Barry Davies demanding costs and telling them basically to b****er off.

 

Judges are VERY sympathetic to people in this situation as Capquest abuse the SD process all the time!

 

hi once again!

great advice given in the past,just need bit more.

after asking the courts to set aside my statutory demand i am now due to attend court this coming tuesday:(

i have just received a letter from capquest which they have forwarded to the court,this is what it says:

" we acknowledge receipt of the application to set aside the statutory demand.

capquest investments ltd are the creditor by virtue of the debt having purchased the debt from RBS. in order to deal fully with the application to set aside we will need information from the originator which we not be able to obtain in time to prepare ans serve evidence in opposition to the application.

we are also mindful of paragraph 6.5(4)(b) of the insolvency rules which provide that if the debt is disputed on grounds which appear to the court to be substantial then the court may grant the application.

we do not accept that the debt is not due but in view of the time considerations and use of the courts time we ask that the application be granted but with no costs. if, as we anticipate we subsequently obtain information which enables us to prove that the debt is due we will proceed bu issuing a claim in the county court which will allow the applicant the opportunity to defend the claim.

 

so sorry for asking you to read all this but please can someone explain what happens next,do i still turn up for court?

wasnt going to ask for costs anyhow because i dont know what to ask for or how to go about getting costs.

 

will this debt ever go away!

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Crapquest should have had their paperwork in order before they issued the SD. By their own admission they had no intention of following it through. You MUST report them to the OFT. Go to the Court as you have not been told by the Court not to appear. Claim your expenses off Crapquest

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really should claim costs - you are entitled to them! Capquest et al get away with tis all the time because people do not claim costs. We need to start hitting them where it hurts!

 

Happy to help you - here.s a copy of my costs schedule. You'll need to send them a similar thing in advance of the hearing. Just make sure you put your name and reference number on the top.

 

Capquest contact info:

 

Barry Davies | Head of Legal Services | CapQuest Group Limited |

Fleet27 | Rye Close | Fleet | Hampshire | GU51 2QQ |

Direct Dial: 0870 084 2568

Fax: 0870 084 2568

Mobile: 07920 136 054

Email [email protected]

 

I recommend emailing and faxing so you know they get there in time!

Capquest costs schedule.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Extraordinary. Capquest take the extreme step of issuing a statutory demand and then try to withdraw it as soon as you seek to have it set aside because they don't have evidence to support their claim.

 

I'd be inclined to go along to the court and demand costs as suggested and let the judge express his views on the situation. SDs are a precursor to bankruptcy not frivolous correspondence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree 100%

 

I'd be inclined to go along to the court and demand costs as suggested and let the judge express his views on the situation. SDs are a precursor to bankruptcy not frivolous correspondence.

 

Judges take a VERY DIM view of this kind of behaviour. I am 99.99% sure you will get costs if you ask for them! Go for it and don't let Bully Boy Barry Davies scare you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your help brent,feel really cheeky asking for costs,havent sent any letters to them so no postage, probably £10.00 in petrol to and froing to court and about 6 hours navigating round this site,lol! plus 3 hours sitting in citizens advice and 2 mornings off work.

wouldnt i need prove of the above claim? and would i just set it our like yours,sending one copy to b.davies and another to court?

crap at things like this!!

am i likely to be asked any questions by the judge?:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Extraordinary. Capquest take the extreme step of issuing a statutory demand and then try to withdraw it as soon as you seek to have it set aside because they don't have evidence to support their claim.

 

I'd be inclined to go along to the court and demand costs as suggested and let the judge express his views on the situation. SDs are a precursor to bankruptcy not frivolous correspondence.

................and doubtless in the nasty covering letter it emphasised how serious the SD was and that if you didnt respond they would make you bankrupt.

 

Just make sure to send CRAPQUEST and the Court a copy of your expenses 24hrs before the Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your help brent,feel really cheeky asking for costs,havent sent any letters to them so no postage, probably £10.00 in petrol to and froing to court and about 6 hours navigating round this site,lol! plus 3 hours sitting in citizens advice and 2 mornings off work.

wouldnt i need prove of the above claim? and would i just set it our like yours,sending one copy to b.davies and another to court?

crap at things like this!!

am i likely to be asked any questions by the judge?:|

 

No you dont need "proof" - "litigants in person" are treated differently to legal professioanls. As long as your claim appears "reasonable" then the judge will award it without further problems.

 

Lets see what you have...

 

You can claim:

 

Filling out and copying application to set aside: 1 hour = £9.25

Travel, attendance and waiting at court to lodge set aside application: - 3 hours = £27.75

Researching the procedure : 6 hours = £55.50 (the judge is likely to allow this as you are NOT legally trained and litigants in person are allowed a LOT more time for things like this!)

Getting advice from CAB: 3 hours = £27.75

Petrol: £10

 

TOTAL : £130.25

 

Dont forget - I got £175 of the buggers so you should go for it!

 

Its not YOU being cheeky - its THEM!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, letter done, now how do i word the cost letter to send with it. telling myself i will never ever get into debt again!! lol!

 

Just attach a schedule of costs as I did (attached)

 

Just adjust it according to what you spent yourself. Expect Barry Davies to huff and puff and say "its not reasonable" and "if it goes to court you may get hit with their costs which will be over £800" (such utter rubbish!) and he will make you a derisory offer (less than half what you ask for) but stick to your guns.

 

Write back to him saying that your costs are "fair and reasonable for a litigant in person and I am confident that a judge would uphold them". He will back down eventually (as he did with me) because they NEVER want to go to court - cowards! Don't blink first :-)

Capquest costs schedule.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

still struggling! ive just emailed capquest with a cost application,what i need to know for sure (as ive received conflicting advice) is do i or do i not need to send a request to the court hearing which takes place on tuesday to have a statutory demand set aside?

if i do is it the same as the one just sent to capquest? :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware you need to request to have the demadn set aside otherwise the court could award the case in capquest's favour.

:!: Activ Kapital 2009 - £316 debt cancelled due to no credit agreement

 

:!: TNC Legal Collections (Swinton) - £61 written off due to complaint being upheld with the FOS

 

:D Be Happy and treat people exactly how you would like to be treated

 

:mad: Don't let people take advantage of you and stand up for your rights and beliefs

 

:p You only live once so don't take things so seriously

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to send Capquest anything.

 

This is how I set out my costs for a case I had

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/49571-havinastella-lloyds-tsb-3.html#post1592689

 

You should be able to find one for a SD though. (I'll have a quick look)

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

When capquest sent through the stat demand they should have sent you a form to fill in which you send to the court to have the demand set aside.

:!: Activ Kapital 2009 - £316 debt cancelled due to no credit agreement

 

:!: TNC Legal Collections (Swinton) - £61 written off due to complaint being upheld with the FOS

 

:D Be Happy and treat people exactly how you would like to be treated

 

:mad: Don't let people take advantage of you and stand up for your rights and beliefs

 

:p You only live once so don't take things so seriously

Link to post
Share on other sites

omg! that looks really technical! does it have to be on official court cost paper? if so do i have to apply to the court for this? running out of time the date of hearing is this tuesday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

omg! that looks really technical! does it have to be on official court cost paper? if so do i have to apply to the court for this? running out of time the date of hearing is this tuesday.

 

You dont need to put it in any partcular way for the court especially as you are a litigant in person.

 

Dont get confused but all this - its really very simple. Just set out the time you spent, at the rate of £9.25 per hour to arrive at the total.

 

You mentioned earlier that Capquest have already said they will not oppose setting it aside. So the issue is one of costs only.

 

Its not correct to say you dont have to serve Capquest with anything - you are required by the Civil Procedure rules to serve upon them a copy of your cost estimates 24 hours before the hearing. Equally, they need to do the same to you. So if you get nothing from them by Monday then they cannot claim costs for attending.

 

Just turn up to court and speak to the judge - there is nothing to be scared of, they are very supportive of litigants in person. Generally, they do not require strict compliance with practice directions from litigants in person as it is expected that you will not know the rules. Most judges will bend over backwards to help you!

 

Oh and if you see my mate Barry Davies from Capquest, send him my regards ;-)

Edited by Brent-London
Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to send Capquest anything.

 

This is how I set out my costs for a case I had

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/49571-havinastella-lloyds-tsb-3.html#post1592689

 

You should be able to find one for a SD though. (I'll have a quick look)

 

Jogs

 

You MUST send both the Court and Crapquest a copy of your expenses claim at least 24 hrs before the scheduled hearing

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...