Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
    • I think they're inventing stuff now. They seem to know they won't be around to implement any of it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can Elche, Ellen or sidewinder confirm/deny my findings please? Modern apprenticeship and equal pay.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5399 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

There's a lad (family friend) who is having some trouble with his employer. He is 19 years of age and is in a level 3 modern apprenticeship. Now, from what I can gather, as he is 19 and not in his first year of the apprenticeship (it's his third year), he should now be entitled to the national minimum wage of £4.77 per hour.

 

He is Scotland however it shouldn't make a difference with the relevant laws I have looked at - I hope!!

 

I've looked at HMRC and I've checked out The employment equality (age) regulations 2006 S 31 (2) and S 31 (3), which appear to confirm my thinking.

 

So am I right or am I wrong? Should this lad be entitled to NMW? His employers are dragging their feet and refusing to budge.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what type of business is the employer? i was a apprentice for my council 3 years ago and got like 90 per week, i was there for three years, i did alot of research and found that the NMW does not apply to apprentices working within government which was annoyng lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not the public services so he should be covered. Govt departments are often exempt from matters that the private sector is expected to abide by. - thank you anyhoo :)

 

It's a private company

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like due to his age + over 12 months in the role, NMW should apply:

 

Excluded from NMW protection are workers who are employed under a contract of apprenticeship or are treated as such and are either under 19 or are within the first 12 months of the commencement of the relevant employment.

 

As neither of these apply, then NMW should be paid.

 

The relevant statutory reference is SI 1999/584 NMW regs 1999 reg 12:

 

12 Workers who do not qualify for the national minimum wage

 

(1) . . .

(2) A worker who—

(a) . . .

(b) is employed under a contract of apprenticeship or, in accordance with paragraph (3), is to be treated as employed under a contract of apprenticeship, and

© is within the first 12 months after the commencement of that employment or has not attained the age of 19.

 

 

I know that in England HMRC will enforce, I assume this applies to Scotland also?

 

 

NMW helpline 0845-600 0678

 

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

He tells me he did ring HMRC NMW helpline who said they will investigate the matter - but I was unsure what was meant by "investigate" - whether they meant they'd have a look into it or whether they would actually enforce it, and he wasn't entirely sure (just a young lad finding his feet in life). We were also unsure if they relevant law applied to Scotland. I couldn't think of a reason why not as NMW is just that - national. Thank you for clarifiying.

 

He has brought the matter up with his employers who are being rather touchy about it, and fobbing him off. I get the feeling because he's a youngster they think he'll just take it lying down.

 

Much, much appreciated Che - I know your time is stretched - thank you.

 

I wonder if I should do a template letter for him to sign and give his employers, pointing out the regs - he is worried with HMRC getting involved if his card will be "marked", so to speak. If I can help him sort this out without his card being "marked" it would be better for him. He's half way through it and doesn't want to lose it. For a young lad, he works dashed hard.

 

He is given his wages in cash, doesn't sign for them and the payslip is handwritten. I asked if there were any deductions for NI PAYE he said no, he's always got the same wage off them. Apparently other employers (time served) get cash in hand also but their deductions show.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Erica

 

I work for a company who places apprenticeships with employers, I am certain he is entitled to MNW. I have received a lot of emails of the last couple of months about apprenticeships entitlement to MNW.

 

I'll post up again Monday with the content of the emails, if I forget please PM me and give me a prod (pregnant and struggling not to be distracted by bright lights).

I love CAG!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

This is the information we were sent re wages for apprentices, I note the person in question is based in Scotland. This information was issued for apprentices in England, confirmation will be required for differences between the two.

 

Apprenticeship Wages as of 1st August 2009

Age

Wage

16-18

£95

This is relevant to any apprentice who falls into this age category, this is the minimum wage that is needed to be paid by the employer (please note the employer can pay more if they choose to).

19+

National Minimum Wage (currently £4.77 an hour)

(£190.80 Gross for 37.5 hour week)

If an 18 year old learner becomes 19 whilst completing an apprenticeship but have been on the programme for less than 12 months, their wage of £95 will remain the same.

Once the 18 year old learner has been on the apprenticeship programme for more than 12 months (obviously turning 19 during this time) then the National Minimum Wage applies.

 

All of this information has been gained from the Apprenticeship Helpline (08000 150600) on Friday 24th July, 2009.

 

Hope this helps!

I love CAG!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to everyone. I wrote this letter to his employers:

 

Dear *****,

 

RE: National Minimum Wage Entitlement

 

I refer to your letter dated ***** wherein you advise me that whilst I am an apprentice the National Minimum Wage does not apply to me, as I am in training. I believe the apprenticeship I am completing is a “Level 3 Modern Apprenticeship”.

 

I draw your attention to the following legislation:

 

· Statutory Instrument 1999 No 584: The National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999, specifically regulation 12, paragraphs 2 (b), 2 © and 3 which stipulate as follows:

 

12. - (2) A worker who-

(b) is employed under a contract of apprenticeship or, in accordance with paragraph (3), is to be treated as employed under a contract of apprenticeship, and

 

© is within the first 12 months after the commencement of that employment or has not attained the age of 19,

does not qualify for the national minimum wage in respect of work done for his employer under that contract.

 

(3) A worker is to be treated as employed under a contract of apprenticeship for the purposes of paragraph (2)(b) if, and only if, he is engaged under the arrangements made by the Government known as Modern Apprenticeships.

 

I also refer you to Her Majesty’s Revenue and custom’s guidance on the National Minimum Wage for Apprentices, which states:

 

From pay reference periods starting on or after 1 October 2006 the special rules for apprentices will be extended to apprentices aged over 25. This will mean that:

 

  • Apprentices under age 19 will not qualify for the national minimum wage
  • Apprentices over age 19 and in the first 12 months of their apprenticeship will not qualify for the national minimum wage.

And lastly, I invite you to view the guidance provided on the Direct.gov website in regard to apprenticships/NMW which states:

 

If you are aged 19 or over and have completed the first year of your apprenticeship you are entitled to the NMW. Apprentices for NMW purposes are either workers who have contracts of apprenticeship or workers taking part in training schemes who are treated as if they have a contract of apprenticeship. The schemes are:

 

  • in England - Apprenticeships or Advanced Apprenticeships
  • in Scotland - Skillseekers or Modern Apprenticeships (but only where the arrangements are for the purpose of gaining a Scottish Vocational Qualification at Level 2 or 3 or a National Vocational Qualification at Level 2 or 3)
  • in Northern Ireland - Jobskills Traineeships or Modern Apprenticeships
  • in Wales - Modern Apprenticeships or Foundation Modern Apprenticeships

 

Accordingly, as I am undertaking in a “Modern Apprenticeship” within Scotland for the purposes of gaining an SVQ at level 3, have attained the age of 19 and have insofar completed more than 12 months of that apprenticeship, I conclude that I satisfy the conditions of entitlement to the National Minimum wage; currently of £4.77 per hour, however increasing to £4.83 per hour from October 2009, based upon my age.

 

I therefore respectfully request that you review your decision in regard to my entitlement to the National Minimum Wage, including the backdating of my legal entitlement to it. If your view continues to be that I am not entitled to the National Minimum Wage, I request that you provide me with written confirmation of this, outlining the reasons for your decision within 28 calendar days of this letter.

 

Yours faithfully

 

He emailed it to his company on the 13th of August. On the 19th, he got his back pay and a letter confirming his entitlement. Result!!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Erika :), he's a lucky lad to have you on his side!

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...