Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you, @honeybee13 and @dx100uk, your help is much appreciated. Could you kindly confirm, @honeybee13, which of the information requested from the sticky thread I should provide given I am at witness statement stage? Sorry for any confusion, I am slightly overwhelmed. — Per @dx100ukI will also provide the defence I  filed and the court directions. — I have not received UKPC WS yet. Should I expect that through the post?  
    • it is not a fine, thread title updated and fine changed to charge in 1st post. also can you post up the defence you filed and the court directions have you received ukpc WS yet? if so scan all that up to. read upload carefully one mass pdf only. dx
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Could you let us have the information we ask for in the forum sticky please? We need the information to start working on your case. Once we have that, I'll get you to answer a different set of questions. Best, HB
    • Hi there,  Long story short, I was working a year ago in a city centre and the site operator I was working with told me I could park in a private car park as they had an arrangement with the owner. I came back to a parking charge  from UK Parking Control, and the site operator subsequently couldn't get hold of the private car park owner and haven't been able to since. Fast forward to today, I have received multiple legal threats from DCB Legal acting for UK Parking Control I have now been issued with a court hearing along with a date. I have to file my witness statement for a court hearing later this summer.  I realise that I could have handled the situation better and am already aware of that. I was wondering what my options are at this stage? I am very keen to avoid a CCJ as it would obviously be disastrous for my credit score. Any advice appreciated. My current plan is to file a witness statement and hope the case is discontinued. Thank you for any advice in advance.
    • I run a small retail business selling cards & gifts ( all my sales are done on a face - face basis  ) & noticed one of the settlement amounts on the card terminal bank deposits was short so contacted the card company which said a customer has requested a chargeback on a sale the reason saying the goods bought was not fit for the purpose purchased for. I have old fashion till which does not show any sales or descriptions of what is bought, plus when the settlement statements match up i shred the sale receipts. The card company told me the transaction was paid for with the customers phone & shows on my portal. They have asked me for sales prof, cctv, terminal receipt of the transaction which I have none, as this was done a few weeks later. I have asked for pictures to prove the items are not fit for the purpose purchased for plus said if the customer can return them i would give them a full refund but have had nothing back plus no pictures. Also I have had no communication with the customer even asking me for a full refund. They have now closed the case & awarded the customer the full refund. Any advice would much be appreciated   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

taken to court for the paid in full debt


flower5
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5361 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am being taken to court by CL Financial for the overdraft/debt I had with HSBC. I have paid this debt in full in February this year but in May I received court papers informing me that CL Financials claiming the money again.

I am sure that case will thrown out of court because I have letters from HSBC apologising for the hustle and confirming the payment.

My question is can do something about false claim, harassment, distress and so on this claim caused me. :confused:

Thx.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can put in a 'wasted costs' claim as part of your defence stating the following.

 

"I attach documentation from the original creditor dated XXX stating the alleged debt was paid in full to them on XXX date. As this clearly states there is no debt the claim should be immediately struck out with no leave to appeal asit is clearly a vexatious claim.

 

As part of my defence I am asking for wasted costs of XXX to be paid by the defendents upon dismissal of the claim.

 

That should be all you need to write and will stuff them completely. Don't forget to include the copies of the letters stating the debt is paid.

 

Classic case of the left not knowing what the right is doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys thank you very much for your support. I filled a defence already, just filled the court form some time ago. The court didn’t ask for any papers to be presented at that time. I just explained that the debt was paid and I have all paperwork proving it. Now I have a hearing date and I need to supply all copies of my documents week before. So, can I put wasted cost claim with it and how much? As I understand that will be cost of my time I spent on this matter. Is it right?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

thx Sillygirl. I saw my friend solicitor earlier on and he suggested sending a letter with the copy of bank confirmation that the debt was paid off to DC. Although I phoned them right after I received the court claim and told them that they playing silly, my friend said I need to send a copy of this letter to have awritten proof. I was furious that I still have to justify myself but his point was that if I don’t do this the Judge can turn around and blame me for wasting court time and not trying to prevent the hearing deliberately.

It just seems not fair that we have to follow every letter of the law and they can just jump on us whenever they feel like it.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with your sentiments, in my case the company are claiming the alleged debt which went to court and was defended and a notice of discontinuance filed is NOT in dispute, even thouugh they have now asked for a CCA on my behalf - when the 12 + 2 days are up they will be getting an email from me telling them that there is a valid dispute and there has been another addendum to the claim in with the OFT. 6 days gone already with another 6 to go (not counting weekends).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget to take the letter you've written to court should it come to that... bet they are after judgement by default (I really think that should be dropped, if neither side shows up the alleged debt is declared null and void).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure whatever you send is sent recorded delivery, absolutely go for wasted costs, include everything youve spent (including parking fees etc.) Every hour you spend even thinking or worrying about this, is research. Grab them by the gonads and have a really hard squeeze. Report to the various ombudsman as well. If its a legal firm report them to SRA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

THx bazaar. I actually called ombudsman but they told me that they cannot help in this situation. They would if it is a credict card but not DC. So, I will contact FOT and SRA as you suggested. And I always send everything by recorded delivery.

I was looking through other threads and understand that judgement by default is applicable to the outstanding debt. MIne was paid off in full. So, I think it is not relevant in my case. Am I right?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt think this would ever see court, once the judge has seen your evidence. If it does, then they aint got a leg to stand on anyways, so as youve been told earlier, let the court know it was paid off and this appears to be an abuse of process for a non existing claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Okay I am back!

Update on the situation.

As my friend solicitor advised I have sent the DC copy of Bank letter confirming that the debt is paid…. Nothing in response….

Today I submitted all paper work which actually states that the debt is paid to my original lender in full and that all payments made to my bank account will be transferred to DC due my account being closed.

I don’t quite understand why they still pursuing this. Probably they hope that for some reason I will get scarred and don’t follow it?? !!! I have to send them all copies of court papers.

Anyway I submitted a Wastes Costs claim as well.

Now I am thinking to attack the bank itself because they obviously didn’t transfer the money to DC as they stated in their own letter leading to a HUGE distress for me. I am not joking, I actually find all this situation very unpleasant and desperate for someone to take responsibility. As far as I can see it is the bank fault and their sorry letter is not good enough any more.

will keep you posted.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

you seem to be on top of this - I would imagine the DC are now hoping you just won't turn up to court so they can get a judgement in default i.e. you don't turn up they get a judgement in their favour.

 

Obviously you are going to turn up and give them hell :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ohhh trust me I will.

The hearing is in the middle of the day and I loose quite a lot in money that day because I need to turn all my booked clients down but I will not miss the show.

;)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...