Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Marbles Taking Me To Court


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5117 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

And here's another thread from me !

 

On 2 July 2008 HFC (marbles) sold my credit card debt to CL Finance and I have continued making reduced payments. I've got a Notice of Assignment from them.

 

I did my CCA request back in January 2009 and also got the infamous application form.

 

Shall I send the unenforceable letter to CL Finance Limited. Think I will be stopping my payment this month and donating it here instead!:grin:

 

Has anyone else had their debt sold on?

 

x:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

Sorry to do this, normally I can find what I need to send... think my brain has turned to mush with my Natwest case.

 

Following my CCA request in January this year, I received a poor copy of a Priority Application Form and T&C's from HFC Bank for my Marbles Credit Card.

 

They have also stated they sold my debt to Lewis in April 2008. Are Lewis the same as CL Finance? and I received my Assignment Notice from them (CL Finance) 2nd July 2008!

 

Can someone point me in the right direction as to which letter I can send to CL Finance regarding Marbles sending me an app. form. It does not state any credit limit, interestingly looks like the PPI box is greyed out so think I may have ticked this box. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

x:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

lewis is the parent company of clueless, these people think nothing of starting court proceedings so make very sure the agreement is invalid, have you posted it up on here to get it checked out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what HFC sent me insisting that that is in some way a 'true copy' - where are any of the prescribed terms I asked them? They pointed to the small print in your signature box - which I don't think is quite right ;) I'm sure someone with experience will be by shortly to give a definitive answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try again PGH it opened for me straight away. Typical Marbles application, very poor quality and no prescribed terms.

 

Someone on another forum won with a similar agreement which was judged unenforceable.

 

PGH is correct CL will commence court proceedings without batting an eyelid if they have got a good case or not so get prepared first before you stop paying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks pedross.

 

It is tempting especially as I also read the thread where someone did win on another thread... but , Yes, I think I will probably keep this one until last, have also a Natwest and Tesco card which I might pursue first!

x:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tex

 

I didn't say don't pursue it. In fact please do as it is probably unenforceable. you need to look more into the threads and get an idea of you next steps.

 

What I said was keep paying the agreed amount to CL while you are writing for further information. You are right the prescribed terms are not there and what they are suggesting is that in the signature box it refers to the terms but that is not good enough. Where are they then and do they comply, probably not.

 

Put this one first, you probably onto something.

 

Pedross

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi I have a question for everyone I am strugling to repay a number of debts which i shall leave out now what i will say is am on payment plans with most however I am trying to get to the botom of Marbles i had card at some time between 1999 and 2001 it endend up with a limit of £800 which i belive i maxed it out however by march 2005 there were £439 arrers showing had letter dated march 05 saying as i was paying at least 1/2 contractual payments could set up reg payment for set amount which turned out to be £12.50 had over a year with no statments then descovered it had gone up to more than i owed orig this figures is now being looked at again have tried to resolve this on manny occassions belive i should owe approx £550 probley no more please help have been told HBos who have taken over marbles dont have much info and they need to request from beneficial whereas my agrement was with HFC i prob do owe them something they pos owe me would it be worth persueing CCa also payment protection was orig on this as found one very old statment help needed thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pedross,

 

Many thanks, might start with my letter to them tomorrow.

x:)x

 

Hi Tex

 

I didn't say don't pursue it. In fact please do as it is probably unenforceable. you need to look more into the threads and get an idea of you next steps.

 

What I said was keep paying the agreed amount to CL while you are writing for further information. You are right the prescribed terms are not there and what they are suggesting is that in the signature box it refers to the terms but that is not good enough. Where are they then and do they comply, probably not.

 

Put this one first, you probably onto something.

 

Pedross

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Gazab,

 

It would be adviseable to create your own thread so that people can respond to your questions more easily rather than re-reading other peoples threads in between.

 

In the first instance I would either do a CCA request (you need to send a £1.00 fee, I always use postal orders) and use a template letter from the CAG library, or you could send a £10 fee and do a SAR request. The Subject Access Request, is supposed to give you copies of all account transactions, and other data they are holding on you. From this you can identify why you have believe their is a discrepancy to your balance.

 

Good luck and keep us all posted.

x:)x

 

 

 

hi I have a question for everyone I am strugling to repay a number of debts which i shall leave out now what i will say is

am on payment plans with most however I am trying to get to the botom of Marbles i had card at some time between 1999 and 2001 it endend up with a limit of £800 which i belive i maxed it out however by march 2005 there were £439 arrers showing had letter dated march 05 saying as i was paying at least 1/2 contractual payments could set up reg payment for set amount which turned out to be £12.50 had over a year with no statments then descovered it had gone up to more than i owed orig this figures is now being looked at again have tried to resolve this on manny occassions belive i should owe approx £550 probley no more please help have been told HBos who have taken over marbles dont have much info and they need to request from beneficial whereas my agrement was with HFC i prob do owe them something they pos owe me would it be worth persueing CCa also payment protection was orig on this as found one very old statment help needed thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear all,

 

I'm going to send another letter but not sure if this needs to go to HFC or CL Finance, (as my debt was assigned to them). Can someone please advise.

 

I found this one from the library - is this the next one I should be sending to them, or is there another one more appropriate to the fact they have sent me an application form? Any comments, as always, would be appreciated.

 

x:)x

 

Dear sir/madam

 

Thank you for your response to my request under the Consumer Credit Act section 78.

In your response you confirm this as a true copy of the original agreement executed by yourselves on the XXXXX.

 

As you must realise this agreement does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and would therefore only be enforceable by a court under s65. However, the absence of any (prescribed terms / signature) means that a court would be prevented from enforcing it under s127(3).

 

I am granting to you a further 21 days to produce a copy of an executable agreement. After that I will consider that the above account is closed and that you will no longer pursue the alleged debt.

 

After this period you should close the file and cease processing an personal data relating to me on this matter.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi everyone,

 

Okay, I received a letter from CL FInance dated 30th September, completely ignoring my letter, but instead saying I have failed to make the agreed payment. I sent them an Account In Dispute letter, but think my next letter will be one I read in the COnsumer Credit Agreements folder which states that I have an application form without prescribed terms.

 

Will keep you all posted.

x:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Tex

 

You need to submit the AoS within the 14 days and the defence another 14 days.

 

Has the claim been issued by CL finance or Howard Cohen. Does the claim include costs for CL finance on top of the court costs.

 

Are you sure you do not have the DN from HFC they normally issue one.

 

Also change your thread title and add - help - court claim issued! I will try and help you as much as I can but I am tied up at the moment. If you get stuck PM me.

 

Pedross

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi pedross,

 

I really appreciate you offering your valuable guidance.

 

I can confirm 100% that I have never received a DN from HFC or CL Finance ever.

 

The claim form is from CL Finances' sols - Howard Cohen & Co. PoC details are: defendent failed to make payment and a default notice has been served upon the Defendant.

 

Yes, claim does include costs for CL Finance on top (breakdown is Claimant costs are approx £1700 + Court fee £75 + Sols fee £80 total just under £1900).

 

I will scan around other similar threads regarding Marbles and complete the AoS / Defence. If I do get stuck, I will take up your offer and PM you. Thanks :)

 

The mods have kindly changed my title as well. Thank you.

 

x:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tex... here's a nice marbles thread for you.. ;)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/192275-ccj-interest-debt.html

 

Spam. :)

 

PS... you might want to get your thread moved to Legal issues forum... you'll get great help there.

 

 

Last Post. :-D

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, about to sort out my AoS. To share the details with you, this is what the PoC says:

 

 

The Claimant's claim is for the sum of £1xxx.xx being monies due from the Defendant to the Claimant under a regulated credit agreement between the Defendant and HFC Bank Limited under reference ############## and assigned to the Claimant on the 4th April, 2008 notice of which has been given to the Defendant.

 

The Defendant has failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served upon the Defendant pursuant to Section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The Claimant claims the sum of £1xxx.xx

 

I will be ticking the disagree with the Claim due to the following;

 

I do not have a CCA with the prescribed terms. I have in my possession an Application Form.

 

b) I have not ever received a DN from HFC or CL Finance and in time will prepare a defence along those lines.

 

c) The only thing I can agree with is Yes, I did receive a Notice of Assignment from CL Finance dated 2nd July 2008, advising me the Assignment took place on 4th April 2008. The same letter also states that due to a printing error, I may not have received the letter dated 1st May 2008, hence this copy! No, I didn't receive any letter dated 1st May!

 

Any help is greatly appreciated. Will keep you all updated. Here we go again!

 

x:)x

Edited by texanbar
typing errors
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...