Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Given leave to appeal - how to proceed help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was given leave to appeal in a case I have which is similar to the Heath vs Southern Pacific case - there are only 21 days from the case to lodge an appeal so I have to lodge it this week, but the barrister will cost me nearly £700 to prepare it. Is this something I can do myself in some kind of simple format or does the barrister really need to do this? He says it would take him about 3 hours for a Multiple agreement claim. In the Judges reasons for allowing the appeal in my case he wrote this after granting the Claimant possession:

 

" There is a division amongst the authorities as to the correct construction of section 11 and 18 of CCA 1974. In October 2009 the CofA is hearing an appeal in the case of Heath. I granted possession because I was bound by Heath, but in the absence of that authority would not have done so. If there is a real prospect of an appeal succeeding in Heath, so the same applies in the present case"

 

£700 this week is a bit of a stretch, but I don't want to faff it up either. Any guidance greatfully received..

 

SC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sc,

 

This is not the ordinary run of the mill appeal. I presume that you have been granted permission at the end of the hearing.

 

The judge is saying that your appeal is dependent on the outcome of the CofA hearing into Heath.

 

In that case I believe all you need to do is submit your Appellants Notice and in the section asking for any applications ask that your appeal be stayed pending the decision of the CofA in Heath, with leave to amend the grounds of appeal in light of the ruling in Heath.

 

That should punt the whole thing into the long grass until October.

 

Depending on the track you need either a form N161 or N164.

 

HTH

 

Dad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting you say that dad, thanks, the judge did give leave to appeal because of the similarities to Heath and recommended a 5 month stay, but the finance company baulked and the judge gave 3 month which defeats the object somewhat of waiting for the Heath appeal result.

 

I am sure the finance company are gambling on me defaulting before the heath case comes out and therefore they will pulverise me at the first opportunity if I do. They are going to be dissappointed, I'll never let that happen even if I have to start start busking..:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

SC,

 

Get your notice in within the time limit.

 

Then provided you apply before each stay expires the appeal court should give you extensions until Heath is heard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are not prepared to await the Judgement of Heath chances are they are trying to circumvent the chance that Heath may be successful - however as has been suggested by dad you can (not forgetting to including the term 'with a mind as to costs') still request a longer stay in much the same way as the banks have

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it's multi track..., but are you saying even if they baulked at the 5 month stay and the judge gave them 3 month you reckon I should/could get that increased through lodging this appeal form?

 

I'm trying to save myself the £700 if I can. I'm on Pension Credit so court fees are found, but Barristers fees arn't I don't think....

 

I took a look at this form and it does seems quite long and complicated, I guess I might be able to do it if I concentrate hard enough ( ooo the pain! :p) all suggestions are really appreciated dad, I think I just need walking through this a little if I attempt it on my own and I have to have it in by Friday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it's multi track..., but are you saying even if they baulked at the 5 month stay and the judge gave them 3 month you reckon I should/could get that increased through lodging this appeal form?

 

I'm trying to save myself the £700 if I can. I'm on Pension Credit so court fees are found, but Barristers fees arn't I don't think....

 

I took a look at this form and it does seems quite long and complicated, I guess I might be able to do it if I concentrate hard enough ( ooo the pain! :p) all suggestions are really appreciated dad, I think I just need walking through this a little if I attempt it on my own and I have to have it in by Friday.

 

We could help you draft it - the problem tho' is that we'd need to see all the docs...

 

I'd have thought that Dad's suggestion sounds sensible...the appellants notice looks worse than it is.

 

If you work through qiuestion by question and ask us anything that you are not sure about. The important thing is to seek both a stay of your appeal AND a stay of the Order pending the Court of Appeal decision

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could help you draft it - the problem tho' is that we'd need to see all the docs...

 

I'd have thought that Dad's suggestion sounds sensible...the appellants notice looks worse than it is.

 

If you work through qiuestion by question and ask us anything that you are not sure about. The important thing is to seek both a stay of your appeal AND a stay of the Order pending the Court of Appeal decision

 

Okay thanks, I'll be back on tomorrow afternoon so I'll print the form out and see how far we get before I need help..many many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How is the N161 going?

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been in contact with my barrister and he's saying that if he's to fight the appeal for me he would rather do it on his own Skeleton argument and as he's been involved from the beginning of the legal battles I tend to agree with him. I've gone over the 161 and as you say, it doesn't look too daunting so if push comes to shove I'll do it, but I do only have until 4pm Friday to lodge this so I am trying to get the money together for my barrister whilst attempting to scramble a skeleton of my own too, I think that gives me another 14 days after the N161 so there is hope. I'll let you know tomorrow as I have to work fast.

 

I really appreciate the assistance. Be back tomorrow. Many thanks

 

SC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sc,

 

You do not need to submit your skeleton with the N161. In section 6 tick the box:

The arguments (known as a ‘Skeleton Argument’) in support of the ‘Grounds of Appeal' will follow within 14 days of filing this Appellant’s Notice

 

What you do need to submit is the grounds of appeal. These go on a separate sheet of paper attached to the N161. The trick is to make them general enough to cover all eventualities, but not too vague.

 

That is why I suggested that you specifically apply in section 8 for leave to amend in light of the CofA ruling in Heath.

 

My suggestion is that the judge pretty much gave you your grounds of appeal in granting permission:

 

" There is a division amongst the authorities as to the correct construction of section 11 and 18 of CCA 1974. In October 2009 the CofA is hearing an appeal in the case of Heath. I granted possession because I was bound by Heath, but in the absence of that authority would not have done so. If there is a real prospect of an appeal succeeding in Heath, so the same applies in the present case"

 

As a thought as you are already on the multi-track, and presumably in to the death, have you discussed with your barrister/solicitor being joined as a party to the Heath appeal?

 

Dad

Edited by dad
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...