Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA or DCA Advice


blueotter
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5120 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anybody give me some advice here please.

As anybody who has had any dealings with this shower can understand MBNA are without a doubt one of the most inefficent shambles of an organisation i have ever come across.

 

At present i am trying to get a payment plan started with them but they've thrown obstacles in my way at every turn and we're at a bit if a stalemate. All the while they've been racking up interest charges on my accounts of over a hundred pounds a month.

They've just sent me this

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2z82adu&s=5

 

Am i better off letting them just write it off and have it all passed to a dca or is that just asking for trouble ?

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

 

Am i better off letting them just write it off and have it all passed to a dca or is that just asking for trouble ?

 

thank you

 

Ok some questions...

 

When did you apply for the cards, was the application online or on paper. Have you CCA'd them? Are there unfair/illegal charges you can claim back?

 

Have you supplied everything they say is required for a reduced payment plan? What are they saying they still need.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had one of them for about 12 years and the other about 4 years,typical mbna stuff,the interest rate of over 30% has just crippled me. I've probably paid them at least 5x what i originally borrowed,maybe more.

I've not cca'd them yet although bearing in mind the time i've had them the cards i doubt very much whether they'd have any documents bar a generic application form.

I've given them everything they've requested,they actually agreed to a plan a while back over the phone and a week later when i'd rung them somebody else said they hadn't agreed !!

If anybody has had any dealings with mbna they'll know how diffuclt they can be,they won't communicate by letter unless they want something and instead prefer to pressurise people over the phone with the explicit intention of wringing enough money as they possibly can.

I'm at breaking point with this and have just had enough,3 months of a total waste of communication and all the while applying charges and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had one of them for about 12 years and the other about 4 years,typical mbna stuff,the interest rate of over 30% has just crippled me. I've probably paid them at least 5x what i originally borrowed,maybe more.

I've not cca'd them yet although bearing in mind the time i've had them the cards i doubt very much whether they'd have any documents bar a generic application form.

I've given them everything they've requested,they actually agreed to a plan a while back over the phone and a week later when i'd rung them somebody else said they hadn't agreed !!

If anybody has had any dealings with mbna they'll know how diffuclt they can be,they won't communicate by letter unless they want something and instead prefer to pressurise people over the phone with the explicit intention of wringing enough money as they possibly can.

I'm at breaking point with this and have just had enough,3 months of a total waste of communication and all the while applying charges and interest.

 

They'll probably have the 4 year old application or at least a microfiche copy of it.

 

If you've sent everything requested by them and not had sufficient response I'd send a formal complaint letter and copy in your local MP and the OFT.

 

They have to respond to your complaint within 8 weeks.. if they dont go straight to the FOS on the fact MBNA are being unreasonable.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Some advice required please from you knowledgable folk on here.

 

I fired off a cca request to this bunch about 3 weeks ago,true to form they've ignored it but seem to be showing a lot of concern as i've had about 6 letters from them,very similar to the one at the top of the page telling me that my account is about to be written off as a bad debt,i'll be liable for the full amount and it will be registered as a default with credit reference agencies.

 

They want me to ring them so we can discuss some options,one of them is a full and final settlement so the question is shall i talk to them whilst not acknowledging any debt to them and tell them that the account as far as i'm concerned is in dispute but i'm willing to discuss a f+f settlement ?

 

Or am i leaving myself wide open to trouble ? I'm tempted to ring them but would like to know what people on here think please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DO NOT RING, under any circumstances, they will only tie you up in knots, offer you a one time offer if you 'take it now' IMHO unless you are able to record your calls, get everything in writing, that will be your only defence.

 

Boo;)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Boo say's do not phone them or answer their phone calls they will tell you anything to get a payment off you. Any agreement made on the phone will be denied. Just keep saying you will communicate by letter only. I have had we are a telephone based company and you must talk to us on the phone, another we are an American company and English law does not apply only American law etc. If you can record the call then record one and send it by e-mail to the Customer advocate office(that is what it was called when I was stuffing them) that stopped all calls to me from MBNA.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some advice required please from you knowledgable folk on here.

 

I fired off a cca request to this bunch about 3 weeks ago,true to form they've ignored it but seem to be showing a lot of concern as i've had about 6 letters from them,very similar to the one at the top of the page telling me that my account is about to be written off as a bad debt,i'll be liable for the full amount and it will be registered as a default with credit reference agencies.

 

They want me to ring them so we can discuss some options,one of them is a full and final settlement so the question is shall i talk to them whilst not acknowledging any debt to them and tell them that the account as far as i'm concerned is in dispute but i'm willing to discuss a f+f settlement ?

 

Or am i leaving myself wide open to trouble ? I'm tempted to ring them but would like to know what people on here think please.

 

As advised, do not ring them.

 

Fill in the red xxx and send this off to them.

MBNA Europe Bank Limited

P.O. Box 1004

Chester Business Park

Wrexham Road

Chester

CH4 9WW

xxxxxx 2009.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

Further to my request under the above act, your attention is drawn to the fact that this account is subject to a serious dispute. On xxxxxxx, by recorded delivery, I requested that you supply me a copy of the executed credit agreement covering this account pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 78, a copy of this request is enclosed. To date you have failed to comply with my request. Without production of the said agreement I am unable to assess if I am indeed liable for any alleged debt to you, nor does it give me any chance to evaluate whether any original agreement was ‘properly executed’ as required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. As you have failed to supply the documents requested, this account entered dispute on xxxxxxxxxxx

 

For the avoidance of any doubt I have included section 78(1) and 78(6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, which states…

 

78 Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement

(1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing ( 12 working days + 2 ) to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of £1, shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

(a) the state of the account, and

(b) the amount, if any, currently payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor, and

© the amounts and due dates of any payments which, if the debtor does not draw further on the account, will later become payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor.

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

 

Clearly as no agreement has been supplied on request, you have not complied with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and I now draw your attention to section 78 subsection 6 which states If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

 

Clearly this is a situation as described in S.78(6) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the debt is unenforceable at this time. In addition, I draw your attention to section 127 (3) Consumer Credit Act 1974 which states

 

127(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

This is backed by case law from the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (House of Lords) the highest court in the land. Your attention is drawn to the authority of the House of Lords in Wilson-v- FCT [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul) which confirms that where a document does not contain the required terms under the consumer credit act 1974 the agreement cannot be enforced.

 

To clarify S.61(1) states

 

(1)A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless—

 

(a) a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner, and

(b) the document embodies all the terms of the agreement, other than implied terms, and

© The document is, when presented or sent to the debtor or hirer for signature, in such a state that all its terms are readily legible

 

In addition the prescribed terms referred to in section 60 CCA1974 are contained in schedule 6 column 2 of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) and are inter alia: - A term stating the credit limit or the manner in which it will be determined or that there is no credit limit, A term stating the rate of any interest on the credit to be provided under the agreement and A term stating how the debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the repayments, which may be expressed by reference to a combination of any of the following—

 

1.Number of repayments;

2.Amount of repayments;

3.Frequency and timing of repayments;

4.Dates of repayments;

5.The manner in which any of the above may be determined; or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable

 

Therefore based upon the Consumer Credit Act 1974 this debt as it stands is unenforceable and should this proceed to litigation, a court is precluded from making an enforcement order under section 127(3) unless a true copy of the signed agreement is produced..

 

At the point where this account entered into the default situation as described in s78 (6) CCA 1974 no other charges are allowed to be added until such time as you become compliant with my request. As you are still not in compliance with my request I insist that the following takes place with immediate effect.

 

All entries which refer to missed payments be removed from my credit file

All collection activities cease with immediate effect until you comply with my request from xxxxxxxxxxxxx or such time as a court makes an enforcement order.

In addition, I draw your attention to the Office of Fair Trading’s guidance on Debt Collection

 

The OFT guidance which was issued July 2003 (updated December 2006) relating to debt collections and what the OFT considers unfair, I have enclosed an excerpt from page 5 of the guidance which states

 

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

 

h. Ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment

 

What I Require.

 

I require that you send me a true signed copy of the executed agreement as required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. If you are unable to supply the requested documentation because no such agreement is in existence I require written clarification as such.

 

I require that you comply with my request within 7 days of the date of this letter. I will not correspond any further with you until I either receive a copy of the requested documents as laid down in section 78(1) CCA 74 or clarification that such agreement doesn’t exist. I am advised that should you persist in pursuing this debt ignoring the above information you will be in breach of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well

 

No other correspondence will be accepted

 

Should you attempt litigation it will be vigorously defended and the failure to supply documentation under the CCA 1974 is a complete defence to any legal action and your actions will be vexatious and unlawful

 

I trust this out lines the situation

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had another phone call from them this morning wanting to discuss my options.I said i'm still awaiting a reply to numerous letters and my cca request.

mbna " Oh i don't have that on record sir "

me "well you do now and mbna have signed for it as well "

mbna "Oh i don't have that on record sir,Anyway we need to discuss your options"

me "Er no,you need to find my letters and reply to them,thank you,goodbye"

 

 

and so it goes on and on and on and on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had another phone call from them this morning wanting to discuss my options.I said i'm still awaiting a reply to numerous letters and my cca request.

mbna " Oh i don't have that on record sir "

me "well you do now and mbna have signed for it as well "

mbna "Oh i don't have that on record sir,Anyway we need to discuss your options"

me "Er no,you need to find my letters and reply to them,thank you,goodbye"

 

Far too polite!:D

Bring it on!!!!!!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I sent off a letter to mbna on the 17th July putting my accounts in dispute and had a phone call from them yesterday wanting to discuss a payment plan ! Once again i asked why there haven't been an replies to my letters and once again i didn't receive an answer.

My refusal to discuss anything on the telephone left her quite distraught and she did say they would now be defaulted althoug hi could buy myself some time if i paid £140.

 

What should i do now ?any ideas please

Link to post
Share on other sites

AAAAAAGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!:mad::mad::mad:

 

They can't default a disputed account!

 

You must stop talking to them on the phone, it makes me so angry:p

And I'm only reading about it!

 

Report them to the OFT

[email protected]

 

Financial Ombudsman Service

 

Home page | Ofcom for their continued harassment by phone.

 

Consumer Direct who will pass it directly to your and their local Trading Standards dept.

 

Consumer Direct

 

Boo:wink:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will whilever they think they can rattle you on the phone.

If you're with BT or Talk Talk, probably others too, you can take out a Choose to Refuse option for about £3 a month whereby you can ban the last caller or input a list of banned numbers.

They're probably getting upset because they don't have the agreement, so will be trying even harder to scare you into paying.

It's totally up to you but after the 12 +2 days with no agreement produced you can legally withhold payment.

You just need to hold fast!

Have you sent them the telephone harrassment letter?

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (delete if necessary)

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi elsa,thanks for the reply,i've not done a telephone harassment letter,i'll send it but i doubt they'll pay any attention.It's a stressful enough time as it is without the hounds continually chasing me,the calls do get more frequent towards the end of the month but i put that down to bonus chasing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi this is one of the ways I got back at the call monkies.

 

Print a copy of the Account in dispute (POST 9 ON THIS THREAD) and keep it near the phone. When MBNA/DCA phones just start reading it to the end of the letter, do not listen to anything they say. You will be surprised how many of the monkies will just put the phone down or if they are still on the phone when you have finished reading then say don't you understand English and then you hangup.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi blueotter ,I too had dealings with MBNA and used to scared to answer the phone due to the continued pressure they applied. I almost lost my home as I paid them rather than the mortgage due to their threats. Since I found this site I found out that all their threats were just that (threats) and no more. Yes they did pass it onto DCA but by that time I had begun to understand debt more ,they have now sold debt to a nasty DCA who tried the same threats. You will like me begin to understand how powerless these parasites are and may even begin to enjoy the calls as I now do. Take the advice of caggers and you will start to take back control of your life and in turn it will be MNBA who will begin to dislike communicating with you.Good luck in your dealings with MNBA ,remember that you have power over MNBA not them.

sleepingdog

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for the advice,got a statement today from them,another £200 in interest for the month,that's £1200 in 6 months since i said i couldn't pay anymore.

i really need to find out what i can do about this interest ,its ridiculous to keep piling it on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for this,i'm going to try and find out what other people are doing as well with this bank,they're a disgrace,all other banks froze the interest payments or reduced them to something manageable,mbna are charging 30% on my balance which grows by £200 a month,i've not used the card for a few years and due to interest charges i've seen the balance almost double.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blueotter,

Stick at it, you're doing great. They're desperately trying to keep you in this position forever more..you are a money cow to them at the moment if they can keep you running scared and making payments, whilst they can still rack up £££££££££'s in interest every month so that your soul is theirs forever more.

If it was me, I'd say bring on the default notices and termination..I haven't dealt with MBNA but in all my circumstances once they've terminated they've stopped adding interest, so at least you have a finite figure to deal with, then you can dig further and either go for the charges if they find the agreements, or legally refuse to pay if they don't find them.

Any F&F they offered you now would be unrealistic,unaffordable and not worth the effort. Remember they only get around 16p in the £, if that,if they sell the debt (plus tax reduction) and remember how much of this is unfair charges and exorbitant interest.

That will strengthen your resolve :)

Stay cool,further down the line once they've realised you mean business and know your rights, it'll get easier. Search on MBNA and see how others are handling them, as you say.

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your kind words,people like myself ,indeed all of us can take a lot of strength and support from caggers on here.

Its a dark difficult time and the advice on here make sit more bearable.

 

I wish they'd just go ahead and terminate like they've been threatening to do for months now,at least that will stop the interest.

 

I've decided to stop making token payments,after all what's the point in it now ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...