Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All, I've just had the inevitable N24 and other paperwork arrive. I've read other examples on here and I think I understand the steps to follow. I have until the 28th May to return the N180 Small Claims Direction Questionnaire, I also have an N244 Application notice copy. I read an update on a case you kindly put a link in for me to read. Turns out they lost in court and are now struggling. I really don't want to get to that stage and am thinking mediation may be the way forward? Thoughts please? Pretty sure I've missed the 7 days to have the order set aside.  For reference, this is what I received: Dated 8th May Before Deputy District Judge Baker sitting at the Civil National Business Centre, 4th Floor St Katharine's House, 21-27 St Katharine's Street, Northampton, NN1 2LH   The Court will deal with the application to lift the stay without hearing under CPR 23.8(c)   It is ordered that:   The Application to lift the stay and for direction questionnaires to be issued is granted.   Because this Order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the Order set aside, varied or stayed. A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this Order. If the application is one which requires a hearing, and   a) the party making the application is the Defendant; and b) the Defendant is an individual,   then upon the filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the Defendant's home court. In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.  
    • no ftmdave ive not emailed at ceo level..i did not know you could do that....but i will do now, thanks. ive just been wasting time emailing to customer complaints department
    • Dx, I've now blocked out and attached a copy of the letter that I'm responding tonight.
    • You mention that Iceland have been useless, and that has been our experience too in other cases. However, have you escalated to CEO level?  https://www.ceoemail.com/s.php?id=ceo-9061&c=Iceland Foods-Chief Executive If not, it has to be worth an e-mail.  Mention immediately, first line, that you are disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of the shop's agents. The idea may fail miserably, but nothing ventured ...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA CCA issue .... I don't trust them !


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5233 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks peeps.

 

They shall get nothing if they call again. It does feel good knowing I have the upper hand ... at this point :D

 

i wonder if someone on the site could put the thumb with the flame coming out of it with the smilies (the old br gas ad) for people to demonstrate that they have taken control!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello all.

 

In the last month I've had about 5 calls from Aegis and Global Vantage asking me to make payments, I refused to speak to any of them.

 

I just got an email from MBNA saying:

 

"Despite the reminders on your statement and our attempts to resolve this matter, we have not received a payment. You should be aware that prompt payment avoids late charges and negative information being registered against you with the Credit Card Reference Agencies. A good credit record is vital if you plan further borrowings in the future such as a mortgage or a personal loan.

 

Please call us on 08000 280689 to discuss this matter. Our specialists are available Monday to Thursday 8am to 9pm, Friday 8am to 7pm and Saturday 9am to 3pm."

 

Should I ignore it ? As far a I am concerned the account is officially In Dispute, MBNA have not written to me about it, my In Dispute letter stated that I would only respond to written correspondence. I'm just looking for some guidance as to what I should do next. Also, at what point can I threaten them with harassment because of the phonecalls from the collection companies ??

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all.

 

In the last month I've had about 5 calls from Aegis and Global Vantage asking me to make payments, I refused to speak to any of them.

 

I just got an email from MBNA saying:

 

"Despite the reminders on your statement and our attempts to resolve this matter, we have not received a payment. You should be aware that prompt payment avoids late charges and negative information being registered against you with the Credit Card Reference Agencies. A good credit record is vital if you plan further borrowings in the future such as a mortgage or a personal loan.

 

Please call us on 08000 280689 to discuss this matter. Our specialists are available Monday to Thursday 8am to 9pm, Friday 8am to 7pm and Saturday 9am to 3pm."

 

Should I ignore it ? As far a I am concerned the account is officially In Dispute, MBNA have not written to me about it, my In Dispute letter stated that I would only respond to written correspondence. I'm just looking for some guidance as to what I should do next. Also, at what point can I threaten them with harassment because of the phonecalls from the collection companies ??

 

Thanks.

 

i would just ignore them for a little while

if they send several more then you can write to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

DiddyDicky - or anyone else in the know, if I have put the account In Dispute and I have a signed receipt for the delivery of that notice to MBNA, why should I respond to any email from MBNA whatsoever ??

 

The notice says that since the account is In Dispute I will only respond to written correspondence. If the relevant department have not passed on my in Dispute notice then surely that is an internal affair for MBNA, right ?!

 

I'm just curious to know why I should actually even respond to an email from them in any case. I've informed the collection agencies of the situation so if they are not communicating this back to MBNA as well then, I think I have done all I should do, or do I have it wrong ??

 

I'm not being shirty here, I just want to know how strong my current position is with regard to my rights having put the account In Dispute.

 

Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DiddyDicky - or anyone else in the know, if I have put the account In Dispute and I have a signed receipt for the delivery of that notice to MBNA, why should I respond to any email from MBNA whatsoever ??

 

The notice says that since the account is In Dispute I will only respond to written correspondence. If the relevant department have not passed on my in Dispute notice then surely that is an internal affair for MBNA, right ?!

 

I'm just curious to know why I should actually even respond to an email from them in any case. I've informed the collection agencies of the situation so if they are not communicating this back to MBNA as well then, I think I have done all I should do, or do I have it wrong ??

 

I'm not being shirty here, I just want to know how strong my current position is with regard to my rights having put the account In Dispute.

 

Thanks all.

 

if you have made it clear you wil only respond in writing thats fine

 

personally i dont give them my e mail addy because during court proceedings they tend to serve notices by e mail at the eleventh hour

 

i always delete e mails unread (as they can record if you have read them)

 

hope that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end of the In Dispute letter I sent it says:

 

" I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

Yours faithfully"

So it does say in writing but I must admit the letter doesn't hammer home the point that I will only respond to them in writing only.

 

Is it worth me writing to them and repeating that I will only respond to them in writing ? Sorry for asking seemingly trivial questions, I just don't want to make any mistakes.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end of the In Dispute letter I sent it says:

 

" I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

Yours faithfully"

So it does say in writing but I must admit the letter doesn't hammer home the point that I will only respond to them in writing only.

 

Is it worth me writing to them and repeating that I will only respond to them in writing ? Sorry for asking seemingly trivial questions, I just don't want to make any mistakes.

 

Thanks.

 

well it doesnt matter which way you put it- they will ignore you anyway- its more to make sure that your paperwork stacks up in court if it gets that far

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just received a letter signed by Martin Supple (Head of Customer Assistance), a reminder to make a payment and a suggestion that I set up a direct debit.

 

I also received a notice of Sums In Arrears.

 

I received an email stating dispite numerous requests for me to contact MBNA I have not done so.

 

I am about to send them a short letter reiterating that the account was put In Dispute by myself and reminding them to send me my CCA. It will be a re jig of my in dispute letter. I will put in caps that I will only respond to written correspondence, no phone calls or emails.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll second that.

 

I take it as yet no cca has arrived? Not even a bad one? Can you remember when you took the card out and was it affiliated with any company ie Virgin/Homebase etc.

There is no such thing as a 0% credit card....... someone out there is paying for it, and for once its not going to be me.:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi peeps.

 

No, I haven't received my CCA back yet in any way shape or form.

 

I got a call from my someone in my family to say that MBNA called me last week.

 

The card was not affiliated, the card is still in my wallet, it has no other logos or names on it apart from MBNA Europe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning all.

 

I got a letter in the post from MBNA containing:

 

a) copy of executed agreement

b) up to date T&Cs

c) a copy of most recent statement.

 

The executed agreement is this (with personal stuff removed), a single sheet of A4 with a scanned document on either side:

 

3883928010

 

On the other side of the page:

 

3883939764

 

I have no idea what to make of this so, your thoughts please, thanks.

 

EDIT - the images are not showing up, I placed them on Flickr and made them public. Is there a better way for me to do this ??

 

I got a call from MBNA this morning "advising me" that soon I would be 3 payments in arrears and they would be notifying the credit reference agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

While I can't be absolutely sure, can you say what the dates are on the bottom right of image CCA2. Does it say 12/03 or 12/05.

 

I do believe that the terms they have sent you don't match the CCA in image "CCA" as you signed that in 2001. I think they are trying it on.

 

Hold fire for more comments.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have an MBNA credit card and i sent the usual letter back in April with a postal order for £1. I did not put my signature to anything. They did not respond and i have been bombarded with phone calls and telling me i am in arrears. Now its September they have rung me and said that the postal order is not the right thing to do and i must send a cheque as it is government policy. They said i am £1000 in arrears because they have not encashed the postal order. I said it was therefore their fault because i had sent them the right money. They have insisted on a cheque and wonder if this is so they can get my signature. I offered to get a friend to send a cheque and they were not happy with that either. Sounds very fishy to me. Has anyone else been faced with this problem and is it wrong to send a postal order?

 

Any advice would be very grateful as they will be ringing back.

 

latipac girl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add. I sent mine in february,they didnt respond then when I put the account in dispute they claimed they hadnt received the postal order. I just replied that it was attached to the letter and provided them with the tracking number. It all went very quiet for a long time, with the exception of the sending me demands for the usual payment. They send a dodgy CCA eventually, but I still haven't paid.

 

Dont believe them, a postal order is the equivalent of cash, hence one of the reasons we send them, as they cant claim extra time to cash them in as they would a cheque. It is classed as legal tender, and there is no government legislation or otherwise to say it must be by cheque. They are in default. Full stop. Do not discuss anything with them over the phone. They will try to trick you into doing or saying something. You must get everything in writing so they are accountable. Refuse to speak to them next time they ring. Do not answer the security questions.

There is no such thing as a 0% credit card....... someone out there is paying for it, and for once its not going to be me.:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some people cannot let a phone go unanswered. You should not even answer the phone to them, it's your phone and you decide who you speak to! Log the time they call. Use the website whocallsme to check the number if you're not sure it's them, but please don't answer the phone!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happenin all,

 

Just looking through your thread, pretty new to this so bare with me. I am also about to take on Virgin (MBNA) through unenforceability, try too anyway. Virgin sent me my credit agreement about 10 days after i sent a CCA. No signsature, no assigned interest as it states it varies, but im not 100% on what grounds to unenforce the debt. Have you lot used a template letter at this point?

Capricorn how do i navigate to your thread? Would be good to get on board with people at similar stages.

Cheers everyone, nice work

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slobbo - Capricorn's thread is here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/185758-mbna.html

 

I would suggest you both (Latipac Girl and Slobbo) start your own thread as I did, that way each thread doesn't get hijacked and end up going off on different tangents, the posters on here reply to your questions quickly and I've had lots of great advice so far, made me feel very comfortable during this process.

 

Silverfox, if it is a date it is 12/00.

 

I have no idea if what they sent me constitutes an enforceable agreement. The 2 scanned thin slips of info don't seem to contain the layout or information that I have seen in other examples and the T&Cs shown are and I quote "... some of the provisions contained in Conditions 1 and 2 of the MBNA Credit Card Terms & Conditions. The other conditions referred to in these paragraphs and the applicable definitions can be found in those Terms & Conditions".

 

I'll check other enforceable and unenforceable examples, but from memory what they sent me seems to be missing key information, can anyone else confirm this ???

Edited by theHotHead
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a link to enforceable and unenforceable agreements:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/162851-consumer-credit-agreements-guide.html

 

I've just gone through it and found the following:

 

1) Creditor's signature is missing from either page

2) Terms and Conditions are on another page (may be the reverse of the application form - not sure if that makes a difference though)

3) There is no credit limit - there is a reference to it in the T&Cs but all it says is "We will from time to time choose the credit limit and notify you of this". It doesn't say they will choose it and let me know, it says from time to time it will change.

4) Condition 4 part b points to an exception for the payments in conditions 2.4, 3.5 and 3.6 - but none of these conditions are present so the form is not easily legible.

 

User pt2537 stated on one of his/her posts regarding an example that has the exact same clauses missing "oh also, since its in relation to a prescribed term, they could be in trouble here too" - What does that mean ??

 

As far as I see, from the examples given on this site, there are a few reasons why this agreement is not properly executed. Not sure if it makes it unenforceable though because on one of the examples given that was not properly executed because the terms and signature of the debtor were on opposite sides of the form (amongst other things apparently), the poster states "this agreement is only enforceabld by court order under s65 of the CCA 1974. It complies with the requirements of s127(3)"

 

Can anyone tell me what that means please ?? I'll see if I can find what they mean myself when I get a chance ... off to work now.

 

Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a link to enforceable and unenforceable agreements:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/162851-consumer-credit-agreements-guide.html

 

I've just gone through it and found the following:

 

1) Creditor's signature is missing from either page

2) Terms and Conditions are on another page (may be the reverse of the application form - not sure if that makes a difference though)

3) There is no credit limit - there is a reference to it in the T&Cs but all it says is "We will from time to time choose the credit limit and notify you of this". It doesn't say they will choose it and let me know, it says from time to time it will change.

4) Condition 4 part b points to an exception for the payments in conditions 2.4, 3.5 and 3.6 - but none of these conditions are present so the form is not easily legible.

 

User pt2537 stated on one of his/her posts regarding an example that has the exact same clauses missing "oh also, since its in relation to a prescribed term, they could be in trouble here too" - What does that mean ??

 

As far as I see, from the examples given on this site, there are a few reasons why this agreement is not properly executed. Not sure if it makes it unenforceable though because on one of the examples given that was not properly executed because the terms and signature of the debtor were on opposite sides of the form (amongst other things apparently), the poster states "this agreement is only enforceabld by court order under s65 of the CCA 1974. It complies with the requirements of s127(3)"

 

Can anyone tell me what that means please ?? I'll see if I can find what they mean myself when I get a chance ... off to work now.

 

Thanks all.

 

Mu understanding is that a credit agreement can comply with s127(3) - a CCA request - without having the debtors signature on it. Howver, to obtain a judegment in court the creditor would need to provide a signed agreement. Basically a CA request can be satisfied with an unenforceable agreement.

 

This is why people are encouraging the use of the cpr rules and/or subject access request to flush out the actual signed agreement to see if its enforceable.

 

Im pretty new to this so so hopefully someone will correct if im wrong :)

I have no legal qualifications whatsoever, so please check any input I have for accuracy. And please correct me if you disagree!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all. I tried reading up on s65 and s127(3) and I got nowhere fast lol.

 

Where I think I am at the moment, I received what MBNA deem to be my CCA, whether it is enforceable or not I guess they have now complied with my request - even if the account is now In Dispute. As far as they are concerned, is that the end of the matter ??

 

The reason I ask is, I thought that something in the courts had to take place for the matter to go to the next stage, once the account is In Dispute.

 

So, I have some documents which do not seem to be correct. Do I need to submit a SAR to further determine exactly what details/docs MBNA have on me, the last thing I would want is for them to magic an enforceable agreement at the last minute ?

 

AS far as they are concerned I bet they think they have complied and will continue to charge me. As far as I am concerned what they sent me is not properly executed and so potentially unenforecable.

 

What do I do now ? Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...