Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank goodness it's not your roof and you get to foot the bill! How big are these bits of mortar? How often are they falling into your garden? Hourly, daily? Just go ahead with your plans, of course, they're not going to be worried by your time pressures and the urgency of the situation, so simply carry on as you would have done and I'm sure everything will go fine. Unless there is a danger to life and serious structural issues which mean you cannot venture into your garden, then IMHO there is little more you can do less for what you have done so already and made them aware of the issue.
    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank of Ireland Debt - Chased by Red Castle/Gothia and now Largo


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4456 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a debt outstanding with Bank of Ireland in the Republic of Ireland. The situation is very similar to this one :

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/158449-castle-let-battle-commence.html

 

I had been paying the loan off remotely but have recently got into financial difficulties and can no longer make repayments.

 

I had a letter first from Red Castle and then another letter arrived the other day from a law firm called Largo. They threatened court action but told me to reply to Red Castle.

 

What should I do in the first instance? I am completly new to all of this and stressed out!

 

My understanding from reading the other thread is that the debt cannot be enforced in the UK. Is this correct? Really appreciate any help on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sheeks,

 

Sorry i can't answer as I donlt know but I'm sure someone who knows will be along shortly,

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you have a judgement already made against you I think it very unlikely that our friends will try to enforce it through the British Courts. Although as ireland is a member of the EU my understanding is that the judgement would needed to have already been granted in Ireland.

 

The British Courts would have no jurisdiction over a Credit Agreement made under Irish Law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this

 

Dear Cretins

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

 

I intend reporting your company to the OFT as you have committed clear breaches of the OFT Guidelines on debt collection. As your company are also members of the CSA you are required to abide by their Code of Practice and failing to do so could render you liable to prosecution under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

 

Please take this as an official complaint and send me details of your company complaints procedure.

Yours etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exact same thing has happened to me today!!

 

Currently living in the UK and had been paying a credit card off issued by AIB. I got an EMAIL today (no letter, no call) from a company called Global Debt Recovery giving a reference number and to contact them IMMEDIATLEY.

 

Im assuming its AIB as ive seen reports on the internet of them using this DCA to chase up on overseas customers, but to me, an email is a completly unnaceptable method of communication as I have never been emailed by a bank before with regard to my accounts.

 

Am going to wait until I receive something in the post from them before acting, and if I do, the above will be sent off.....thanks ODC!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A loan taken out in Ireland will be the subject of an agreement regulated by the (Irish) Consumer Credit Act 1995. This cannot be enforced in a Court in UK other than is circumstances likely to be prohibitively expensive for the bank.

 

Have either the BoI or DCA sent a Default Notice? Unless they have done so, they are prohibited from taking any action:

 

s.54(2) A creditor or an owner shall not, by reason of any breach by a consumer of an agreement—

( a ) determine the agreement,

( b ) demand early payment of any sum,

( c ) recover possession of the goods,

( d ) treat any right conferred on the consumer by the agreement as determined, restricted or deferred, or

( e ) enforce any security,unless he has served on the consumer, not less than 10 days before he proposes to take any action, a notice which shall specify the following:

 

(i) details of the agreement sufficient to identify it;

(ii) the name and address of the creditor or owner, as the case may be;

(iii) the name and address of the consumer;

(iv) the nature of the alleged breach;

(v) either—

(I) if the breach is capable of remedy, what action is required to remedy it and the date before which that action is to be taken, which date shall be not less than 21 days after the date of service of the notice, or

(II) if the breach is not capable of remedy, the sum, if any, required to be paid as compensation for the breach and the date before which it is to be paid, which date shall be not less than 21 days after the date of service of the notice; and

(vi) information about the consequences of failure to comply with the notice.

 

The only way they can do anything without having served the Notice is where a Court has agreed, and I assume that they won't have bothered - the costs in consumer credit action not being recoverable by the creditor.

 

However, given that UK DCAs and their solicitors appear to have great difficulty complying with their obligations under UK laws, I doubt whether they will be able to get to grips with Irish law.

 

Incidentally, Largo sell solicitor's letters to DCAs, so I doubt whether anyone legally qualified has been anywhere near this case.

 

So, I suggest you make it easy for them. Send them a standard formal request under s.78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. They will either produce a copy agreement which you can then point out is not enforceable in the UK, or they will catch themselves on and say that they don't need to comply because the debt isn't subject to UK law, in which case you can point out that it's not enforceable in UK.

 

Of course, you will also be formally disputing the debt; under the OFT Guidance a UK DCA must suspend all collection activity until the dispute is resolved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi again

 

Thank you very much for your input & apologies for the lengthy silence of late (life kicked off...)

 

I'm not aware of a DN having been issued by BOI unless they sent it to my old address in Ireland before I notified them of the change of address & it's simply sitting there (does that give them any traction?)

 

Largo went quiet and have since a letter from BOI notifiying me that they were handing it over to their legal dept. & had another letter from Red Castle-Gothia today demanding payment & threatening all sorts.

 

I'll send the CCA request (should it go to Largo or Red Castle at this stage?) immediately.

 

Really appreciate the help.

 

Many thanks

Skeeks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...