Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Missy - v - 1st Credit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3726 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Spot on MC, although it pains me to type it :(

 

:evil: At stupid judge for moving the goalposts!

 

But, I'm learning thanks to you guys 'n' gurlz and that's gotta be worth a big smiley :-)

The villany you teach me, I will execute, and it shall go hard but I will better the instruction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi

 

Just an update on this situation. 1st Crud tried again to pass this on to a different DCA. I seemed to have put the brakes on that again by using letters found in the library.

 

As previously mentioned !st are still reporting this to CRA and I have a big black D every month since March 2009. Can I clarify that if I am prepared to sit this out then I only have untill Mar 2015 where the alleged debt becomes statute barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SB comes in to play in most debt situations if you haven't acknowledged the alleged debt in writing, or paid anything off the alleged debt for six years... CAG does not advocate debt avoidance but we can, where possible, give you the information to help and/or seek help from appropriate organisations such as national debtline or CAB. If the debt collection agency, in this case 1st credit, breach your rights under the OFT guidlines, CPUTR 2008 or UCPD 2005/29/EC please report them to Trading Standards and the OFT via consumer direct because they are/were under OFT sanctions for unfair debt collection processes including issuing Statutory Demands and using the insolvency services as a method of debt collection that the OFT are very concerned with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Another update on this long running saga. Every once in awhile !st try all different permutations of threats. The latest one is to now threaten me with bankruptcy proceedings. I would like to now make a formal complaint against them and maybe even ask for a 3rd party to resolve this. Who would be the body that I complain to?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another update on this long running saga. Every once in awhile !st try all different permutations of threats. The latest one is to now threaten me with bankruptcy proceedings. I would like to now make a formal complaint against them and maybe even ask for a 3rd party to resolve this. Who would be the body that I complain to?

 

Thanks

 

Formal complaint to 1st Credit followed by a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman service, if you're unhappy with 1st Credit's final response to your complaint. It will cost 1st Credit a case management fee of £500 (I think) if you do refer to FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I'm aware the above response is correct although, of late, I have not kept up with OFT guidelines as I have been involved with multiple groups/organisations etc. mostly regarding the Welfare changes that IDSIOT is hell bent on bringing in to the very real and severe detriment to the very poorest and most vulnerable people in our society...

Link to post
Share on other sites

the fos will not decide as to whether your agreement is enforceable or not only a court can do that. They will however decide as to whether 1st C have treated you fairly or not following an unsatisfactory respose to your formal complaint

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the fos will not decide as to whether your agreement is enforceable or not only a court can do that. They will however decide as to whether 1st C have treated you fairly or not following an unsatisfactory respose to your formal complaint

 

Allegedly, 1st credit do not like Trading Standards, the OFT (had them under a list of sanctions for ages, not sure if they still have), FOS and they're scared s***less by the new version coming in with more teeth in April 2014 :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allegedly, 1st credit do not like Trading Standards, the OFT (had them under a list of sanctions for ages, not sure if they still have), FOS and they're scared s***less by the new version coming in with more teeth in April 2014 :)
so best way forward then to link your complaint to the OFT debt collection guidelines and consequently CPUTR2008 breaches, and then complain to the FOS and TS:lol:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if 1st C as assignees dont think they are "the creditor" for the purposes s78 in this instance Jones v Link Financial may help to disillusion them:-)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if 1st C as assignees dont think they are "the creditor" for the purposes s78 in this instance Jones v Link Financial may help to disillusion them:-)

 

BB v 1st Credit, on many occasions, should have disillusioned them, but they appear to have yet to grasp the fact that they are debt purchasers in many cases and are very often very wrong in that the alleged debtor is not their victim at all and have been proven so, scared off but then reappear when they feel like it :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Missy,

 

I've been reading all the thread and have noticed that you'd been advised by a few to send for a SAR but all you've been chatting about is the CCA

 

You've never answered this from others, so now I'm asking? A simple yes or no .......... I've done one recently and its picking up anomalies.

 

Also you were asked about PPI and reclaimable charges, have I missed your answer? My SAR has shown up some.

 

NM

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I have agreed a partial settlement with !st with the agreement that they or anyone else does not chase for the rest of the disputed debt. This was in Feb and I just checked my credit file and the record is marked as PS (partial settlement) but it still says the account is in default. This is not what I expected. Will this account stay open with the CRA and be reported on every month as in default?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A default will stay on your credit file for 6 years from the date of default. I have one with m&s on my file, they accepted a full and final of about 30% from me, marked it as partial settlement but the default is still showing, although m&s obviously don't update it anymore, my default is due to drop off this summer...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for replying.

 

I understand 6 year rule it's just that in the month I made the final settlement. They insist on calling it a partial settlement. this is what it looks like:

 

February 2014

PS

Partial settlement. The payment status has been reported as in default.

 

I an assuming in March there will be no other reporting and the defaults will start to drop off. The first was in April 2009 and so that will drop out in April 2015.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...