Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the scrappage scheme is nothing to do with the agreement ...sorry. it's an enticement to purchase a replacement vehicle. just the same as shop signs that say 50% off or whatever.  its a done and dusted deal done before you enter into the agreement for the remaining £sum. 
    • don't get too hung up on the real meaning of 'fake' in terms of the documents a claimant might produce relating to a potential court claim. by fake we typically mean, they are not obviously the 'real McCoy' ,100% associated with whatever credit they are trying to pin on punters. they are often of the right 'version' that an OC would have used for that particular take out date, but with details inserted in a diff font where they should be for say your name address DOB etc. All DCA's typically  have filing cabinets covering each year for most creditor, whip 'em out, scan and copy n paste your details onto them, even easier now with online sign ups. no hard copies ever sent cause 90% of mugs have lost them..... one of our most powerful tools is the fact any docs they produce, unless they state they are 'a reconstruction'  MUST come from the original creditor noty some hidden pile the claimants have. Link are absolute masters at this so dont stick to lowell threads. dx    
    • Driving home last night I contacted wing mirrors with a car coming the opposite way. The wing mirror folded in and the glass popped out. Very minor damage.  I stopped at the next layby (A road) to repair the mirror. A passerby stopped and said they saw the other car stopped behind me in another layby - they went back and passed over details so we could get in touch.  The conversation started cordially, but quickly got heated when I said I was well on my side and they drifted over (which is what happened).  I wasn't going to bother filing a claim as there isn't enough damage to justify it. So I've said to the other party lets just call it quits as there are no witnesses and we both think we are innocent.   they said they are contacting the police and insurance and that they have witnesses. But a quick facebook search found a post by the other person saying they were in a crash, and were 'spun' off the road. Picture of a broken wing mirror and a slight scuff on the front and rear wheel arch. they are asking for witnesses. I have screenshots of the post, and sent them another message saying I can see you dont have witnesses as you are appealing for them. I'd really not drag this out. Lets call it quits and move on. this was followed by a couple of messages that didn't really make much sense. e.g. 'do the right thing'. What should I do now?  Contact police?  Contact my insurance? - Can I tell them about this incident but say I dont want to claim? Will that affect my premium?  
    • This is the crux of the argument. The scrappage contribution should have also been counted as a deposit. It was literally a part exchange in return for a cash deduction so there is no reason it wouldn't be treated the same way.  I did not request a VT, I was struggling to pay after a separation from my partner at the time. However had the figures been reflected correctly, the VT cost would have been 2k not 9k and I may have considered it as an option. Instead, the car was marked stolen and removed from my possession by the police
    • LOL - old one the fiver theory - although with the poops its take a fiver now, promise 10p  sometime in the future while claiming the reverse theory   So when is jenrick, an apparent slam dunk as referenced higher in the thread, being referred to the police? These poops need to know that anything they throw will be returned .. with interest  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent Advice Needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5481 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello i am in court on tuesday 12-05-2009 . It is regarding a loan with tesco.It is a joint loan, but tesco are only chasing me.We are paying our debts through payplan.

 

I already have a ccj from tesco but it was for the exact amount paypal suggested.Tesco immideatly asked for tit to go back to court which is tuesday.

 

tesco solicitors sent me some paperwork today stating they dont accept the ccj payment and want the whole amount, so they can go for a charging order.They are also asking the court to vary the order forthwith.

It also says if the court is minded to grant an installment order, leave is requested to apply for a charging order but not to be enforced if payments are maintaned.

 

If our home is sold there wouldbe no money left as we have a secured loan.We also have 2 young childern, and my wife is sick and has been for 10 years now.

 

Any help welcome please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes they did get a ccj granted it was for exactly the same amount as I pay on payplan. But tesco immidiatly applied to go back to court.Paypal asked for it to be heard in my local court. That is this coming wednesday.I put wrong date on initial post.

 

Tesco are going for the whole amount so they can get a charging order.

 

Just like to know what i could say to the judge in my defence.I have acted as responsibly as i can by getting advice and help from paypal and have paid on time for the last 6 months since my plan started.

 

All my other creditors 12 of them have been ok, its just tesco.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ccj was granted 2 months ago in northampton, im happy with the ccj as much as i can be.It was for the exact amount i can afford.CCJ's arnet good but my credit is ruined anyway now.

 

I just fear being made homeless by tesco, i have a sick wife and 2 small children

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

I'm presuming you admitted to the debt or passed the Court paperwork onto Payplan to deal with.

 

Firstly, you won't be made homeless.

 

Judges have been advised in the current economic climate to be cautious about giving Charging Orders and then issuing Enforcement of Sale orders..........you will NOT be homeless !

 

So try not to worry about your home.

 

Moving on to what you wish to do about the situation you are in.

You have three options :-

 

1/ You could apply for a set aside of the Count Court Judgment. This would cost £75.00 though.

 

2/ You could oppose the Order to vary and thus the Charging Order.

 

3/ Do nothing and let the situation run its course.

 

 

If you opt to set aside the CCJ, you would need to demonstrate why you did not oppse the CCJ at the time.........their could be numerous reasons for this e.g. you didn't know your legal rights, poor advice from Payplan etc. If you did go for this option, it would cost £75.00 for the set aside application and some letter writing.

 

If you don't wish to oppose the CCJ but decide to oppose the Order to vary, then you have several points you can make to the court. You can ask for an installment order, which is where you pay an amount set by the court to the creditor every month.

 

There are several other points you can make to the court as well to oppose Tesco's wish for a Charging Order.

 

Have a look at the links below on Charging Orders and what grounds you may oppose them-

 

Debt Factsheets - Charging orders in the county court

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 15 Charging Orders In The County Court

 

and this gem of a post ( Courtesy of FunkyFox ) -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...t-1848474.html

 

 

From your original post, option 3 is a non starter.

Edited by supasnooper
typo

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.

 

Object strenuously and ask that the judge opts for an instalment order for a monthly payment you can afford. !!

 

Complete the I&E form ( make sure it leaves you paying what you can afford - add a bit extra on all the items to cover inflation ;) ) in the link below, print two copies ( one for the judge and one for you - Tesco's don't get one as they aren't entitled to one !) and take them with you.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=1712&d=1199396120

 

 

If the installment order is granted, get the bank details straight away.

 

If they can't supply them in front of the judge, ask for the first payment to be set 28 days after receipt of the bank details being furnished and then get a date set for regular payment.

This must be done in front of the judge as it will then be on the court records.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

Just come back from court.i was absolutly terrified, why I dont know.When i got there its was just a waiting area in some offices.There were lots of other people from all walks of life waiting to be seen.

 

Tesco solicitor came and had a word, she was very nice.So I went into see the judge and she was very nice.

 

So what the judge decided was I think ?. An installment order for the same amount I offered. She gave permision for tesco to apply for a charging order if I didnt pay the installment order.She also noted that the sale of the house would not be aloud.

 

I think that is basically what was said.I was so nervous, its escaped me a bit.

 

So will they send a new judgment out??

 

Thanks for the reply's

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

 

So what the judge decided was I think ?. An installment order for the same amount I offered. She gave permision for tesco to apply for a charging order if I didnt pay the installment order.She also noted that the sale of the house would not be aloud.

 

well dun. did u do as Snoops said above? if not get those payment details asap, set up the payment and dont miss a any.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

Just come back from court.i was absolutly terrified, why I dont know.When i got there its was just a waiting area in some offices.There were lots of other people from all walks of life waiting to be seen.

 

Tesco solicitor came and had a word, she was very nice.So I went into see the judge and she was very nice.

 

So what the judge decided was I think ?. An installment order for the same amount I offered. She gave permision for tesco to apply for a charging order if I didnt pay the installment order.She also noted that the sale of the house would not be aloud.

 

I think that is basically what was said.I was so nervous, its escaped me a bit.

 

So will they send a new judgment out??

 

Thanks for the reply's

 

Well done, that's excellent news !!

 

Hope you managed to get all the payment details from Tesco's.

 

The court will send out a Judgment Order stating what was decided today so both sides are aware.

 

If you have not got the payment details from Tesco's, then write to them and ask for them.

 

If they do not respond, within 28 days from today, send them a cheque by Recorded Delivery at least and another request for payment details.

 

If they refuse to comply, write the court for the attention of the Judge who heard your case asking them to order tesco's to disclose the details required.

 

 

If \ Once the payment details are disclosed , then do feel free to set up a Standing Order for the amount (do NOT do a Direct debit).

 

Enjoy your evening.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...