Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My understanding is that they won't provide the name to me whether the investigation is Live or Closed, & I have no legal rep as I didn't have P.I. Cover on my policy, & am intending to claim using OIC.org.uk, but remain completely stuck as they 100% cannot open a claim on the portal without both the Reg. No. & Name of the other driver.  
    • thanks again ftmdave, your words are verey encouraging and i do appreciate them. i have taken about 2 hours to think of a letter to write to the ceo...i will paste it below...also how would i address a ceo? do i just put his name? or put dear sir? do you think its ok?  i would appreciate feedback/input from anybody if anything needs to be added/taken away, removed if incorrect etc. i am writing it on behalf of my friend..she is the named driver  - im the one with the blue badge and owner of the car - just for clarification. thanks in adavance to everyone.       My friend and I are both disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents.   I have been incorrectly 'charged' by your agent 'excel parking' for overstaying in your car park, but there was no overstay. The letter I recieved said the duration of stay was 15 minutes but there is a 10 minute grace period and also 5 minutes consideration time, hence there was no duration of stay of 15 minutes.   I would like to take this oppertunity to clarify what happend at your Gravesend store. We are struggling finacially due to the 'cost of living crisis' and not being able to work because we are both disabled, we was attracted to your store for the 10 items for £10 offer. I suffer dyslexia and depression and my friend who I take shopping has a mobility disability. We went to buy some shopping at your Gravesend branch of Iceland on 28th of December 2023, we entered your car park, tried to read and understand the parking signs and realised we had to pay for parking. We then realised we didnt have any change for the parking machine so went back to look for coins in the car and when we couldnt find any we left. As my friend has mobility issues it takes some time for me to help him out of the car, as you probably understand this takes more time than it would a normal able bodied person. As I suffer dyslexia I am sure you'll agree that it took me more time than a normal person to read and understand the large amount of information at the pay & display machine. After this, it took more time than an able bodied person to leave the car park especially as I have to help my friend on his crutches etc get back into the car due to his mobility disability. All this took us 15 minutes.   I was the driver of my friends car and he has a blue badge. He then received a 'notice to keeper' for a 'failure to purchase a parking tariff'. On the letter it asked to name the driver if you wasnt the driver at the time, so as he wasnt the driver he named me. I appealed the charge and told them we are disabled and explained the situation as above. The appeal was denied, and even more so was totally ignored regarding our disabilities and that we take longer than an able bodied person to access the car and read the signs and understand them. As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us. I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge.     After being discriminated by your agent my friend decided to contact 'iceland customer care team' on my behalf and again explained the situation and also sent photos of his disabled blue badge and proof of disability. He asked the care team to cancel the charge as ultimately its Iceland's land/property and you have the power over excel parking to cancel it. Again we was met with no mention or consideration for our disability and no direct response regarding the cancellation, all we was told was to contact excel parking. He has replied over 20 times to try to get the 'care team' to understand and cancel this but its pointless as we are just ignored every time. I believe that Ignoring our disability is discrimination which is why I am now contacting you.     I have noticed on your website that you are 'acting' to ease the 'cost of living crisis' : https://about.iceland.co.uk/2022/04/05/iceland-acts-to-ease-the-cost-of-living-crisis/   If you really are commited to helping people in this time of crisis ..and especially two struggling disabled people, can you please cancel this charge as it will only cause more damage to our mental health if you do not.  
    • I've also been in touch via the online portal to the Police's GDPR team, to request the name of the other Driver. Got this response:   Dear Mr. ---------   Our Ref: ----------   Thank you for your request which has been forwarded to the Data Protection Team for consideration.   The data you are requesting is third party, we would not give this information directly to you.   Your solicitor or legal team acting on our behalf would approach us directly with your signed (wet) consent allowing us to consider the request further.   I note the investigation is showing as ‘live’ at this time, we would not considered sharing data for suggested injury until the investigation has been closed.   If you wish to pursue a claim once the investigation has been closed please signpost your legal team to [email protected]   Kind regards   ----------------- Data Protection Assistant    
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

me & the OH's debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4427 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 511
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello there to you guys,

 

I have just read your post, are you having any luck?

 

Do you still need some help or advice?

 

If so, reply back whenever you can, and I will see if there is anything that I could help you with.

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was defaulted by MBNA last July whilst the agreement was in dispute, they sold the debt to Direct Legal and Collections or Hillesden Securities. They wrote to me last August stating that they had purchased the debt and would start colllections proceedings. They have not started any proceedings, they do not write or telephone me in relation to the debt. They do however continue to report to Experian and Equifax as if they have a contract with me. I have never entered into an agreement or contract with them, have never discussed anything with them in relation to paying them. I want to put an end to this once and for all and would really appreciate any advice on how to finally draw a line under this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was defaulted by MBNA last July whilst the agreement was in dispute, they sold the debt to Direct Legal and Collections or Hillesden Securities. They wrote to me last August stating that they had purchased the debt and would start colllections proceedings. They have not started any proceedings, they do not write or telephone me in relation to the debt. They do however continue to report to Experian and Equifax as if they have a contract with me. I have never entered into an agreement or contract with them, have never discussed anything with them in relation to paying them. I want to put an end to this once and for all and would really appreciate any advice on how to finally draw a line under this.

 

Hello there alternative - answer;2827361,

 

What happened with MBNA, why were they unable or unwilling to resolve your dispute?

 

In the first instance write to Experian and Equifax and inform both of them to remove the unlawful default, and to cease accepting any further communications from Direct Legal and Collections or Hillesden Securities on your credit file, because for them to do so, is an act, considered by the courts to be unlawful, the information being held by them relating to your personal data regarding this alledged Debt owed by you and due under a contract to the DCA'S is untrue.

 

state to both Credit reference agencies that if they do not comply with your respectful request with in the next fourteen (14) days, then you will take legal action against them under the Data Protection Act and obtain a court order that will legally enforce them to rectify the personal data that they hold on file relating to you.

 

I would then advise you to write to the DCA'S concerned with a "Subject Access Request" notice (DPA) enclose the £10 fee, state to the DCA that you require them to provide you with a true (Identical) carbon copy of the credit agrement and all and any other personal data held by them that relates directly to you. Send your "Subject Access Request" to the DCA'S compliance manager.

 

Thirdly, (I am very sorry about all this paperwork) write to the original creditor (MBNA), sending your communication to the Company Secretary, state clearly the situation regarding the time when you were in dispute with your account them and the reason for the dispute, the unlawful default and the unlawful processing of your personal data to the DCA'S, state to MBNA that you hold them responsible and liable for the untrue information that the DCA'S are communicating to the credit reference agencies.

 

State to MBNA, that for them to default you at a time of a genuine dispute and to then sell the account debt to a third party without ever giving any notice to you is absolutely unlawful, state that you respectfully request that MBNA make contact with the third party (DCA) and purchase the debt back from them and then open up a direct channel of communications with you in order for MBNA to resolve this dreadful matter in the honourable and rightful way that they should of undertaken with you in July.

 

Provide MBNA with a twenty one (21) day time scale to action the above.

 

State to the Company Secretary that you are following pre action protocols and that if they do not make any effort to bring about a satisfactory resolution, then you will forward a formal Letter Before Action

providing them with a further fourteen (14) days to resolve this matter before commencing the legal action.

 

I know this is a lot of paper work for you, and no doubt you have probably wrote quite a few letters to all those concerend, but you must write a few more I 'm afraid good friend, ensure that your letters are strong and firm, clear and concise and polite and respectful at all times, don't listen to that nonsense that you should keep your letters short, (Less is more).

 

Even if your letters end up 30 or 40 pages long (Because of all the details) then still send them, always state the words "Without Prejudice" on your letters and always state that you will only accept correspondence in writing only.

 

By the way, also state to the DCA'S (Again in writing) that you dispute this debt and that you expect them to comply with the Office of Fair Trading and their debt collection guidelines while you are communicating with the OC MBNA.

 

I must say that I would absolutely insist that MBNA purchase back this debt and resolve the matter directly.

 

I hope this will help your situation, if it does not, then please do not hesitate to let me know (Perhaps you have tried all of these avenues already).

 

Well, good luck, please up-date

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Merc finance continues to process my data even though I have ended the contract with them.

 

Anyone help with the particulars of claim to stop them doing all this???

 

Hello emanevs,

 

I might be a little to late (But hopefully, I'm not) as I have only just read your post, do you still require any assistance regarding "Particulars of Claim" N1 form?

 

Please up-date

 

Many Thanks

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello the mould,

 

Used all of the templates, no luck whatsoever.

 

I want to take them all to court now, even served them all with the statutory notice - ignored totally by all these organisations, including the three credit ref agencies.

 

Any help on the particulars of claims, including how much this would cost would be really helpful.

 

Also, if I had say, 20 creditors all non complying can I include them all on one claim?, or would it have to be 20 claims???

 

many thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello the mould,

 

Used all of the templates, no luck whatsoever.

 

I want to take them all to court now, even served them all with the statutory notice - ignored totally by all these organisations, including the three credit ref agencies.

 

Any help on the particulars of claims, including how much this would cost would be really helpful.

 

Also, if I had say, 20 creditors all non complying can I include them all on one claim?, or would it have to be 20 claims???

 

many thanks,

 

Hello again emaneve,

 

You say that you have 17 Defaults on your credit files, are they all unlawful Defaults?

 

When you say "20 creditors all non complying", precisely what is the Non-compliance conduct of them?

 

You also state that all of these organizations have ignored your statutory notifications, were these notifications sent to them under the Data Protection Act?

 

Please accept my apologies in advance for all of these questions.

 

Have you used only template letters, and did you send any of your letters to the Company Secretary of any of these organizations?

 

You have probably been over this again and again, please bear with me,

 

Firstly, I really do need to know whether the Defaults are unlawful or not and whether or not if you are in any contract or relationship with any of the organizations concerened.

 

With the 20 creditors, are they all linked together in some form of arrangement or are they all seperate to each other?

 

How long has this situation been going on for, and exactly what pre action protocols have you complied with?

 

As far as how much is this legal action going to cost you, its difficult to say at the present (Simply because I need more details/facts from you).

 

I will most definately assist you where I can, and hopefully I will be able to provide you with a letter that will grab their attention and produce the required response from them in order to bring about a satifactory conclusion to this matter for you.

 

Well, I shall look out for your reply and take it from there.

 

Kind Regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

where its complicated is that I entered an iva, then subsequent BR.

 

Cahoot has acknowledged that there is no need to register a default where the debt has been included in an IVA.

 

However, they (Cahoot) including all of my old creditors refuse to remove the defaults.

 

I never received all of these defaults, because of my IVA.

 

Whats worse, is that even now, some TWO YEARS AFTER BR, they are all still saying that I owe them thousands!!!!

 

This is causing me no end of problems and I have had enough of it.

 

I dont want all of this on my credit file indefinately, yet it appears that they can and are keeping it all on my file.

 

Experian has written to me, to confirm that they CANNOT REMOVE THESE DEFAULTS AND CORRECT THE INFORMATION ON ME WITHOUT THESE ORGANISATIONS AUTHORISATION??? :eek::eek::eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

where its complicated is that I entered an iva, then subsequent BR.

 

Cahoot has acknowledged that there is no need to register a default where the debt has been included in an IVA.

 

However, they (Cahoot) including all of my old creditors refuse to remove the defaults.

 

I never received all of these defaults, because of my IVA.

 

Whats worse, is that even now, some TWO YEARS AFTER BR, they are all still saying that I owe them thousands!!!!

 

This is causing me no end of problems and I have had enough of it.

 

I dont want all of this on my credit file indefinately, yet it appears that they can and are keeping it all on my file.

 

Experian has written to me, to confirm that they CANNOT REMOVE THESE DEFAULTS AND CORRECT THE INFORMATION ON ME WITHOUT THESE ORGANISATIONS AUTHORISATION??? :eek::eek::eek:

 

Hello emanevs,

 

Yes I see what you are saying about it being complicated.

 

Did you ever receive a DEFAULT NOTICE from any of your creditors?

 

When you bacame BANKRUPT did any of your creditors receive any payment to the debt you owed?

 

I am again sorry about the questions, I need to look into this situation for you, so I'm am going to do a bit more research on your case and then I will get back to you later on this evening, probably after 9 o' clock .

 

I will check back in later.

 

Kind Regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello emanevs,

 

Yes I see what you are saying about it being complicated.

 

Did you ever receive a DEFAULT NOTICE from any of your creditors?

NO

When you bacame BANKRUPT did any of your creditors receive any payment to the debt you owed?

YES

I am again sorry about the questions, I need to look into this situation for you, so I'm am going to do a bit more research on your case and then I will get back to you later on this evening, probably after 9 o' clock .

 

I will check back in later.

 

Kind Regards

 

The Mould

 

MANY THANKS,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there alternative - answer;2827361,

 

What happened with MBNA, why were they unable or unwilling to resolve your dispute?

 

In the first instance write to Experian and Equifax and inform both of them to remove the unlawful default, and to cease accepting any further communications from Direct Legal and Collections or Hillesden Securities on your credit file, because for them to do so, is an act, considered by the courts to be unlawful, the information being held by them relating to your personal data regarding this alledged Debt owed by you and due under a contract to the DCA'S is untrue.

 

state to both Credit reference agencies that if they do not comply with your respectful request with in the next fourteen (14) days, then you will take legal action against them under the Data Protection Act and obtain a court order that will legally enforce them to rectify the personal data that they hold on file relating to you.

 

I would then advise you to write to the DCA'S concerned with a "Subject Access Request" notice (DPA) enclose the £10 fee, state to the DCA that you require them to provide you with a true (Identical) carbon copy of the credit agrement and all and any other personal data held by them that relates directly to you. Send your "Subject Access Request" to the DCA'S compliance manager.

 

Thirdly, (I am very sorry about all this paperwork) write to the original creditor (MBNA), sending your communication to the Company Secretary, state clearly the situation regarding the time when you were in dispute with your account them and the reason for the dispute, the unlawful default and the unlawful processing of your personal data to the DCA'S, state to MBNA that you hold them responsible and liable for the untrue information that the DCA'S are communicating to the credit reference agencies.

 

State to MBNA, that for them to default you at a time of a genuine dispute and to then sell the account debt to a third party without ever giving any notice to you is absolutely unlawful, state that you respectfully request that MBNA make contact with the third party (DCA) and purchase the debt back from them and then open up a direct channel of communications with you in order for MBNA to resolve this dreadful matter in the honourable and rightful way that they should of undertaken with you in July.

 

Provide MBNA with a twenty one (21) day time scale to action the above.

 

State to the Company Secretary that you are following pre action protocols and that if they do not make any effort to bring about a satisfactory resolution, then you will forward a formal Letter Before Action

providing them with a further fourteen (14) days to resolve this matter before commencing the legal action.

 

I know this is a lot of paper work for you, and no doubt you have probably wrote quite a few letters to all those concerend, but you must write a few more I 'm afraid good friend, ensure that your letters are strong and firm, clear and concise and polite and respectful at all times, don't listen to that nonsense that you should keep your letters short, (Less is more).

 

Even if your letters end up 30 or 40 pages long (Because of all the details) then still send them, always state the words "Without Prejudice" on your letters and always state that you will only accept correspondence in writing only.

 

By the way, also state to the DCA'S (Again in writing) that you dispute this debt and that you expect them to comply with the Office of Fair Trading and their debt collection guidelines while you are communicating with the OC MBNA.

 

I must say that I would absolutely insist that MBNA purchase back this debt and resolve the matter directly.

 

I hope this will help your situation, if it does not, then please do not hesitate to let me know (Perhaps you have tried all of these avenues already).

 

Well, good luck, please up-date

 

The Mould

I was/am using a claims firm which originally obtained my credit agreement and audited it and found breaches in the prescibed terms. MBNA complied with a subject access request and considered that they had complied at point but believed the agreement was enforcebale. I had stopped paying on the agreement whilst in dispute, but MBNA still went ahead and defaulted me and sold the debt to Hillesden Securities. MBNA did not resolve the dispute although they considered it enforcable they did not pursue collections.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MANY THANKS,

 

Good evening emanevs,

 

What was the filing date of your bankruptcy?

 

Chapter 7 & 11 are not deleted from the filing date for 10yrs because there is no repayment of any debt.

 

Chapter 13 bankruptcy is deleted 7yrs from the filing date because a portion of the debt is repaid under the discharge plan.

 

 

So, leading up to your bankruptcy, you were unable to meet your normal monthly payments to your creditor accounts, and so you defaulted on the contract, you say that none of your creditors sent you a default notice, you were then declaring bankruptcy and arrangements were being made to pay some of the debt to your creditors.

 

As no default notice was ever serverd, the defaults can be removed from your credit files.

 

You should send a formal Letter Before Action to the Company Secretary of all three Credit Reference Agencies, Call Credit, Experian and Equifax, and state to them that the personal data that they hold on record relating to you is untrue, and the holding of such untrue data is considered by the courts to be unlawful.

 

State to the CRA'S (Company Secretary only) that there is no contract or relationship between you and the Creditors/DCA'S that are continuing to make entries on your Credit file.

 

State that they have fourteen (14) days in which to comply with your respectful and factual request, and that if there is no positive and satisfactory response from them to your communication, then you will make an application to the courts for a court order against them that will legally enforce them to up date your credit files to show accurate, rellevant and up to date data in relation to your personal information.

 

Your letter, start it off like this:

 

STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL

 

FOR THE PERSONAL ATTENTION OF

 

MR whoever Your name

Company Secretary Your address

Credit Agency

Blah etc Without Prejudice

 

FORMAL LETTER BEFORE LEGAL ACTION

FOURTEEN (14) DAY TIME SCALE FOR RESPONSE

NO FURTHER NOTICE WILL BE SERVED

REFERENCE: CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY, CORPORATE LIABILITY

 

SUBJECT: THE DATA PROTECTION ACT

 

 

Dear Mr so and so,

 

State the facts.

 

 

Have all of your creditors been paid off now, or what is the arrangement?

I will come back to you later on (Tonight) about these defaults.

 

 

If you think or feel that I'm not helping or perhaps not helping at all please do not hesitate to say so, I won't be offended.

 

I think I need to know more about these defaults, the time of them defaulting you.

 

Well I hope this will help you and I am still researching your situation.

 

Kind Regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

MANY THANKS,

 

OK emanevs,

 

I believe this is what you have been looking for:

 

 

DEFAULT NOTICE:

 

All credit applications (Eg personal loans, credit cards or store cards) opened in the United Kingdom are regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 2006. This piece of legislation requires that creditors must issue a Default Notice to any customer who has fallen behind with payments to their account, before legal action can be pursued to recover the monies owed.

 

 

INFORMATION REQUIRED ON A DEFAULT NOTICE:

The following information is required on a default notice-

 

1. Name and address of both the creditor and the borrower.

2. Agreement type and the agreement breach details.

3. Settlement figure (Fixed sums only)

4. The action required by the borrower to remedy the situation and comply with the agreement.

5. Intended action of the creditor should the borrower fail to comply with the agreement.

 

Your creditors have not complied with legislation under the Consumer Credit Act 2006 [2006 chapter 14], therefore, the Defaults are ilegal, as is the processing of your personal data to Credit Reference Agencies, the processing of your personal data is, without question, absolutely unlawful.

 

Check out the PRINCIPLES No's ONE (1) TO SEVEN (7) AS STATED IN SCHEDULE 1 PART 1 OF THE DATA PROTECTION ACT.

FURTHERMORE, LOOK UP THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 2006 CHAPTER 14. It will assist you.

You will find that you now have enough ammunition to rid yourself of these pebbles in your shoes, and with just a little effort, your path will become smoothe and comfortable.

 

 

Compensation,

 

Defaults = £1,000.00 per default

 

Contraventions of the DPA= £1,000.00 per contravention by the data controller.

 

 

New limits comming in next month (April) of substantial fines to any data controller (UP to £500,000.00, half a million pounds) for serious breaches/contraventions of the Data Protection Act.

 

 

Legal action (Top of this post) in your case by the creditors, includes a legal right to process/disclose your personal information/data.

 

 

Give them all your volcanic power and send them into meltdown, obviously ensure that your letters do this in the most respectful and politest way possible, and as always, state "Without Prejudice" on your letters.

 

Destroy and enjoy.

 

I do so really hope this will help you.

 

Kind Regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was/am using a claims firm which originally obtained my credit agreement and audited it and found breaches in the prescibed terms. MBNA complied with a subject access request and considered that they had complied at point but believed the agreement was enforcebale. I had stopped paying on the agreement whilst in dispute, but MBNA still went ahead and defaulted me and sold the debt to Hillesden Securities. MBNA did not resolve the dispute although they considered it enforcable they did not pursue collections.

 

 

Hello and good morning alternative-answer,

 

Sorry I'm getting back to you so late, If MBNA believed the contract to be enforceable, then they would of maintained ownership of the debt and instructed the DCA'S to act for them.

 

It seems to me, from your post, that MBNA knew the contract was unenforceable and so sold it to the DCA'S knowing that if it should go legal then the DCA would have to take the fall for it.

 

Write to the DCA and inform them that MBNA knew that they were selling an unenforceable agreement, state to the DCA to take it up with MBNA, and if they continue to harass you for this disputed debt, then you will file for an injunction against them under the harassment act.

 

By telling the DCA that MBNA sold them an unenforceable contract it will make their blood boil, give them a major headache for a change.

 

If niether the OC OR DCA can prove the legality of the said document, or make no effort to resolve this dreadful matter, by continuing to disregard your communications to them, state to them that their actions will be considered by the courts to be vexatious.

 

Ram it all down their throats, and follow-up on any legal threat of action you state to them.

 

I hope this will help.

 

Kind Regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emanaevs and alternative answer,

 

While it's great that the mould is providing you with help, you will get a wider range of support if you both start your own threads. Your two personal threads intertwined with this one makes reading, digesting and following the train of thought very difficult.

 

With the greatest respect to mould, when it comes to things as serious as this, it makes a lot more sense to have others peer review advice given rather than rely on one party (although I stress this isn't aimed at mould but a general statement). this cannot be done when you are posting over someone else's thread.

 

can you please both ask the mods (pm any of the site team) to migrate your posts on this thread so far to your own threads. You will get a broader range of advice that way. I can't follow it like this and though I'd like to help with my personal experience of successful default removal, I'm simply not willing to spend ages trawling through an interwined and confusing thread. best wishes guys, and post your new thread links here so I can follow to your new locations. :)

 

plus, posting your own problems on someone else's thread really isn't fair to lickthewallfatboy (the OP).

To err is human: to completely mess up is my peculiar gift.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

ok guys and gals

 

list the number(and names if you can remember them all:lol:) of DCA's you have successfully sent packing with tails between their legs,after reminding them of your legal rights,or by totally ignoring them

 

phew-where do I start?

 

1ST CREDIT

CONNAUGHT

MARLIN

LCS

METROPOLITAN

ROBINSON WAY

BRYAN CARTER

MCKENZIE HALL

LOWELLS

SCOTCALL

POWER2CONTACT

AKTIV KAPITAL(ESPECIALLY DESERVING OF AN AWARD FOR FUNNIEST NAME)

CAPQUEST

WESCOT

CABOT

MOORCROFT

CALDER FINANCIAL

RED

 

I'm sure there are others but I can't recall just now....

 

let's see your roll of honour,caggers!!!

 

Who holds the record for number of separate DCA's defeated and wins the award?

Edited by lickthewallfatboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far

 

Mackenzie Hall, Lowells and 1st Credit (all for DH and all for the same alleged SB debt)

 

Myself -

 

1st Credit, SD set aside and costs awarded,heard nothing since 2008

Cabot, Goldfish debt, no CCA provided, not heard from since early 2009

 

Hopefully by this time next year I'll be adding Cabot again for my Sainsbury's account but its early days lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...