Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
    • Thank you so much. Yes, I wish I had done my research and not paid. It's all for the same car park. Here is one of the original PCNs, they are all the same bar different dates. PCN-22.03.24-1.pdf PCN-22.03.24-2.pdf
    • Hi Clou, Welcome to the Forum and thank you for reading first before you posted. There seems to be many problems with Cornwall and getting a signal to use your a phone which could be why these parking companies don't use alternatives. It is a shame you paid the first one as you would probably have not had to pay that one either.  Was the car park at which you paid the same parking company as the one sending you these PCNs? On the subject of PCNs could you please post them up so we can see if they comply with the Act.
    • 1 Date of the infringement 16th March   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 22nd March   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received unsure   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] UNSURE   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes   6 Have you appealed? [Y] post up your appeal] Yes. Stated incorrect location was used in JustPark app as honest mistake. Rejected of course.   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Yes, rejected:   Site: Sea View Car Park, PL27 6SR Date of Event: 16th March 2024 We are in receipt of your challenge in relation to the above Parking Charge. Appeals must be handled in a fair and consistent manner, therefore, in order for us to cancel any Parking Charge; it is necessary for us to find that the Notice was issued in error. As per the clear and prominent signage at this location ('The Contract'), drivers agree to pay the sum of £100 if 'A valid ticket is not displayed face-up on the dashboard; enabling all of the printed information to be inspected'. 'The Contract' also details that there is an exception for those with a valid mobile session in place. Had the driver felt that the terms of the contract were unacceptable, they had the option to seek alternative parking. By remaining, the driver is deemed in law to be bound by the terms of 'The Contract'. Our photographic evidence confirms that a valid ticket was not displayed, and a search of our records confirms that no mobile session was in place for the registration XXXX at this location; therefore, your appeal is declined. We note that you have submitted evidence of payment; however, said payment is not for this location. It may be the case that you feel that the charge is unfair; however, there is no legal basis to now reject a charge that the driver has already agreed to pay. In light of the above, the sum £100.00 is payable by 21/05/2024 or £170 thereafter. Our internal appeals procedure is now exhausted, our decision is final; therefore no further correspondence other than payment will be addressed or responded to. Should you disagree with our decision, you may submit an appeal to 'The Independent Appeals Service'; full details are on the rear of this letter. 7 Who is the parking company? Alliance Parking LTD   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Sea View Car park, Polzeath, Cornwall   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS Hi there, thanks in advance for any help on this.   Had 3 'PCNs' in post from Alliance for parking 3 times over a period of two weeks, unfortunately we were away from home so letters must have come over the two weeks but we received all at once if that makes sense. I realised I had used the wrong location on the car park app. The signs are not clear what the location is called (no code.) I only had receipts for two instances so I assume the first it didn't go through as had terrible signal. Paid £60 for one of the fines. Appealed the others saying it was an honest mistake and not very good signage (unfortunately submitted on their website and have no evidence of my appeal.) received the rejection of appeal as above.   Have now received the attached letter of claim. I have done some research for the amazing snotty letters but wonder if someone could kindly help me with writing one specific to my case? Thank you so very much in advance. LOC-alliance-1.pdf Apologies, 2nd page of LOC here. LOC-alliance-2.pdf
    • Would still like to see the court bundle  Any part ex as deposit or any deposit paid on the agreement does imo count towards the one third or the half in the case of a VT
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BMIBaby Admin Charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I unfortunately made a slipup with the name of my sister when I was booking for a flight - I used her maiden name instead of her marriage name. I immediately realised my mistake afterwards and rang the customer service line as soon as it was open. Only to be horrified that they would charge £35 (admin) + £80 (new price) = £115. After much persasion they agreed to £35 if I could fax them a copy of the marriage cert. I tried about six different fax machines but always their machine did not answer. Then they said they would do it for £100 admin fee. I wrote to the 'customer relations' dept who just said I wuld have to pay the £100.

Given that this is not a person change but a maiden name change that can be proved, can I claim that £100 admin fee is unfair?

This is bearing mind that to even to do that you have to ring a premium rate number (35p per min) to get the change done.

 

Any advice welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

Put down to experience, I'm afraid. Budget means check everything twenty times before clicking purchase, T&C's the lot. They know if you make a mistake, they'll have you...it's the game. It's not on, but it's easy money for them. We don't live in a customer service world, it's all profits and hugely inflated charges.

 

I've always thought those admin charges are challengable, but a name change isn't as easy I don't think. It would be for me if you were to fight it in court, but alas it's not so easy.

 

I'm not surprised at the fax thing, that was probably to get you off their backs, though I think you're getting confused over the admin fee... £100 would be bonkers!

 

I think that's still including a price rise of some sort. Out of curiousity, how long after you made the booking did the ticket price shoot up £80? Sometimes it's better to start a booking afresh than fall for their fees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response.

The admin fee for name changes is actually £100...

"Name changes to flights can only be made via the call centre and are subject to an administration fee of £100 (€125) per passenger."

http://www.bmibaby.com/bmibaby/en/index.aspx?p=21

I rang up the next day and the price had gone up £40 on each leg.

However, I think they have changed the rules since then. They don't charge the fare difference anymore. I guess they have worked out that it is more lucrative to charge £100 per shot than to charge £35 + fare difference.

 

The reason why the price went up so quick, was it was a school holiday. These are already not cheap. I'm already paying £212 for the ticket! I was just outraged at £100 + premium rate call for a simple name change following a geniune slipup.

Edited by ponsrow
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yikes.

 

Well, it's an admin fee. I'd be wanting to know how they break it down, and I reckon the only way is to take them to Court.

 

It can be a real headache and takes time and research, that's why so many people roll over and take it up the proverbial.

 

I know I would try though. :D

 

£100 to type in a name change? and E125 is alot more than £100, the cheeky swines.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a verified, geographical saynoto0870 BMI Baby number if you need to try it.

 

01332 854000 (HQ Customer services switchboard)

 

I think their argument would be a 'service', but would it still be OK if it were £2K? Got to draw the line somewhere surely.

 

Just an opinion, but I would think it would be considered unfair (totally anti MSE sheep sentiment).

 

Does anybody think UTCCR would apply here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to take that flight, you'd need to pay it and then try to reclaim it, totally up to you.

 

You can keep at them trying, but ulimately it's up to them what they charge at this stage. They might give in a bit, but writing to give 'them a chance' isn't really right, they have your money and are holding you over a barrell. You'd have needed to have already been slapped by this digusting fee in order to warn them as such, should you choose to try and sue them.

 

Do consider another airline if cheaper than the fee. There are some very good deals out there on flights at the moment.

 

Still, I doubt you can reclaim what you have lost so far, so I'd pay it for now with a view to taking advice on how to get it back on your return.

 

Admin fee in the UK £100, or EU £110... that sucks, and evidently have chosen to retain the number in spite of the weakening pound. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Btw, ponsrow, you may come up against a couple of arguments which I do not agree with...each to their own!

 

It has been stated, by MSE lords and flocks, many times that if they didn't charge high admin fees poelpe would simply hoover up promo fares and sell them on, and if the name change fee was more realsitic, people would be making alot of mulah at the cost of the TA/TO.

 

That is a problem, and I don't know how to resolve it, but charging customers who have just paid good money and using that excuse, is just pure convienience for the them. It still boils down to unfair terms to me.

 

Some airlines don't allow for name changes at all and force you to re-book, so I suppose it could be worse, but BMI Baby have a cheek charging £100-£110 when the average return flight doesn't cost that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given that a small concession was offered if the marriage certificate was sent through, that would suggest there is a part solution to differentiate a genuine error from someone selling tickets on. The same if surname remains the same but new first name.

 

I've no doubt all solutions will be open to complications and trickery but I feel that if something seems unfair it probably is. I also think that the airlines have opened themselves up to this complaint now that so much of the booking process is online rather than hand written tickets.

 

As to the OP's complaint, I suggest just keep writing and escalating to different levels in the organisation and remind them that they suggested faxing but that did no good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What gets me is the fact that the OP rang up straight away after realising his mistake. He had just paid for the seat. The devilment is saying that the ticket has gone up £80 in a New York minute, and finally accepting a £20 admin fee on top. How gracious! not to mention the run around and phone calls.

 

I realise the online price will be cheaper than on the phone, but the point is that if there was any sense of customer service, and not just a view to exploitation, they would just charge a nominal fee for the required manual intervention - nothing to do with selling on here, though it's a problem in general, so I can't agree it's a part solution since they are just whacking £80 on in 'fare increases'.

 

I agree about the automated bit!

 

I don't understand how the T&C's charge £100-£110 to cover admin (and it must without profit) and then ever so kindly accept £20 to do it.

 

Ahhh, rats! It's profiteering and exploitation, and the airlines know fine well they are at it, same as some do by not returning APD and they all claim extraordinary circumstances in every cancellation - it's a miracle!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I have just this minute made a mistake myself on a booking with BMI baby. I booked a ticket for a friend to travel down to my wedding in September and put my own name in instead! Duhhh :mad: I have a baby screaming in one ear and a bed calling for me lol. Called up there sales centre straight away (65p a minute!!!) and got the same £100 to change the name. This is absolutely ludicrous!! I of course just re-booked the ticket in the correct name at a cost of £40.90! An expensive mistake to make. Perhaps 'economy' isn't such an economy after all. I certainly shan't use BMIBaby again and neither shall I be recommending them to anyone....quite the opposite in fact. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just booked some BMI flights recently and the charge to book on a credit card £26.50!!!

 

Even to book on a debit card - £19.50

 

Oh but it's free if you have a visa electron - exactly what percentage of the poplation have one of them then eh??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I have just this minute made a mistake myself on a booking with BMI baby. I booked a ticket for a friend to travel down to my wedding in September and put my own name in instead! Duhhh :mad: I have a baby screaming in one ear and a bed calling for me lol. Called up there sales centre straight away (65p a minute!!!) and got the same £100 to change the name. This is absolutely ludicrous!! I of course just re-booked the ticket in the correct name at a cost of £40.90! An expensive mistake to make. Perhaps 'economy' isn't such an economy after all. I certainly shan't use BMIBaby again and neither shall I be recommending them to anyone....quite the opposite in fact. :(

 

If the booking page isn't 100% correct - they've got you. You're quite right - it then becomes a false economy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just booked some BMI flights recently and the charge to book on a credit card £26.50!!!

 

Even to book on a debit card - £19.50

 

Oh but it's free if you have a visa electron - exactly what percentage of the poplation have one of them then eh??

 

Open up a basic Bank account and get one andie! Halifax and the Co-op do one for starters. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Have you thought about initiating a charge back with your bank. Different from a section 75 (good less than 100.00) however still extremely useful.

 

There are a number of reasons people use charge back and you have 120 days from the day of the transaction.

 

The list of reasons is quite long...But do a search.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi you've all got me really worried. I booked 5 flights for myself, hubby and 3 three kids last Sep. We're flying out to Spain next week. I didn't include our middle names as the web-site asks for FIrst name and last name. THis isn't technically a name change as the name is staying the same - should I notify BMIbaby and will they charge us? It could be really expensive for all of us.

 

Has anyone any experience of this sort of thing?

THanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi you've all got me really worried. I booked 5 flights for myself, hubby and 3 three kids last Sep. We're flying out to Spain next week. I didn't include our middle names as the web-site asks for FIrst name and last name. THis isn't technically a name change as the name is staying the same - should I notify BMIbaby and will they charge us? It could be really expensive for all of us.

 

Has anyone any experience of this sort of thing?

THanks

 

You've nothing to worry about, they only ask for, as you say, first and last names.

 

So long as they are as your passports..... you're good to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

THanks Thailand, that's very reassuring.:) THe bit that worried me is the website says in small writing you have to fill in names "exactly as appears on your passport". So if I've omitted all our middle names will they use that as an excuse to charge £100 each admin cost when we turn up at the check-in. (I forgot to mention we're also taking my mother so the thought of paying an extra £600 for all of us would ruin the holiday). Reading other people's horror story experiences of BMI Baby I'm worried that they may penalise us because the ticket names aren't an exact match.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...