Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I have done the wrong thing :(


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5476 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have done a bad thing today, despite reading the posts here, saying not to contact the DCA, i did that today.

 

Firstly i have been getting letters from Ruthbridge Ltd saying that they are going to make me brankrupt, and also calls every single day from them saying to contact them.

 

Today [name edited] called and left a message saying that i had 7 days to pay up, and have had many chances to pay ect, going to make you bankrupt ect.

 

This is in relation to an Egg Loan from 2000.

 

Hearing the message today got me mad so i called them.

 

I spoke to [name edited] the mopst obnoxious bloke ever.

 

I said i have got 7 days to pay £2000 or they will make me bankrupt. I said i do not acknowledge the debt. He said i am lying and that this egg loan is mine, and that "I" have confirmed this, and just ignored letters and moved house ect over the years. I said i have never had an egg loan, so i said when was this taken out, he says 2000, So i said well that is 9 years ago and you can not enforce it, he says they can and they will. I said i have not had an egg loan, for which he said bull****. I then asked well when was the last time i paid on this alleged debt, he answered 2002. I said well that is over 6 years old and is unenforcable. He claims that i have made written confirmation acknowledgng the debt since then ((This is not the case at all). He then says why did you not inform Egg on your credit file when you moved house. I said well if i have not got a debt with Egg, why would i want to contact Egg for? He then he went off on a rant and he said Mrs XXXX ? I siad sorry Mrs ??? who? He is saying well who is this Mrs ?? does she live there too?

 

I'm like now, you said that name, i dont know who it is, and he was well we will be sending letters to everybody at this address. You have 7 days to pay up or you will be vistited by the bayliff. And then he hung up.

 

What an absoulte [swear filter] he was. I know i did the bad thing and called and then got into a conversation because i was fuming. But what are my options?

 

I know for a fact that since the last payment was made in 2002, i have not paid or acknowledged this debt, that is 100% Fact!, so what should i do?.

 

sorry for the rant and wafflle but he made me mad. :mad:

Edited by steven4064
Name of individual removed. Swear filter bypass deleted
Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this;

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Acc/Ref No

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I wish to point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

I should also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against me to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Print Name do not sign

 

 

 

2u7t9g1.gif

 

 

If they continue collection activities make a complaint to your local trading standards & the OFT with regards to their harassment and threats, they are in clear breach of OFT guidelines & CPUT;

 

Debt collection guidance - Final guidance on unfair business practices - oft664

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Joss or Josh Hughes is obviously reading these forums as 10 minutes after i had posted, i get another phone call which went straight to the answer phone, saying that they will use "Message Board Forum Posts" on top of other evidence of the so-called debt. This is your final chance to agree to the reduced settlement figure of £1698, If not paid in full by 12th May then banckruptcy proceedings will take place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's already been tried in a court and the Judge made a statement that the use of consumer forums is irrelevant, besides these muppets will not go anywhere near a court.

 

Make a complaint to the OFT as I said, outlining that message & keep the recording very safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt is statue barred and in dispute then perhaps you should also refer them to the recent OFT decision as regards Mackenzie Hall...

 

The Office of Fair Trading: OFT imposes requirements on Mackenzie Hall to improve handling of disputed debts

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you feel better or worse after the call - the idea is to feel better - in my opinion your answers were good, as it was he who was getting into state making threats etc. and to a lady too - tut tut.

 

Whilst it is fresh in your mind, writing it out word for word and send a complaint to anyone you can think of - oh, and it would definitely appear the it is SB anyway!!

 

Don't feel too badly, we have all done something silly at some time - main thing is it must not make you angry or mad - just laugh at them!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the eejits hate CAG because we know how to handle them......profits are in the bin,and soon their jobs will be in the bin as well-and they know it only too well

 

DO NOT DELETE THAT RECORDING......it will come in extremely useful

 

talk about shooting themselves in the foot!! LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Joss or Josh Hughes is obviously reading these forums as 10 minutes after i had posted, i get another phone call which went straight to the answer phone, saying that they will use "Message Board Forum Posts" on top of other evidence of the so-called debt. This is your final chance to agree to the reduced settlement figure of £1698, If not paid in full by 12th May then banckruptcy proceedings will take place.

 

Sounds like Mr Joss or Josh Hughes is a little weazel...you know the type, big bad boy when he's miles away hidden away in some smelly call centre. Face to face probaby wouldn't have the guts to look you in the eyes:rolleyes: Providing forum posts wouldn't prove a thing...what the little to**er and his beloved leaders need to do is prove the debt otherwise they would be laughed out of court:razz:

And the fact that their offering a reduced settlement when they claim they have evidence of the debt only proves their talking pants.

I'd tell the big bad boy:rolleyes: to 'go jump';)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's a clear demonstration of how much CAG are kicking them in the nuts day after day, when they throw the dolly out of the pram as if threats to produce forum posts in court was soooooooo scary......

 

get a life fella

 

and follow that with a real job!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They called again this morning at 7:30am. I picked up, heard it was the same guy. Put the phone down.

 

Aside from complaining, you need to get a whistle and blow it down the phone at them!!

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL how on earth could they use anonymous forum posts in court?

For all the court would know, it could be the DCA themselves posting an admission of the debt to use it in court as fake evidence.

Would they ask CAG to check/confirm IP addresses?!!

Could be posting from a library or anywhere. Idiots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This little slimeball is obviously desperate for some commission before the weekend so as he can stock up on the WKD's.

Depending on how brave you are (we advise against it for those who are not) but if you are now feeling braver after your recent run in - then you can phone the little slimeball back & taunt him.

They hate people who know their rights too much :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the letter as in post #2 above....(send it recorded) once they have received it and if they continue to call you....write down the times and dates they call (including the one at 7:30am) this morning....this is against even OFCOM's rules.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I love receiving calls from the DCA's; if they try to get me to say something incriminating I either put the phone down or completely change the subject.

 

I know some people can get tongue tied on the phone but I love winding them up... it just means the use of any tape is ultimately useless for them because they usually yield and contravene the OFT guidelines in some way.

 

It's all about being careful what you say and staying silent in the right places.

 

Oh and I noticed Meritfarce/Muck Hall haven't reactivated their online chat facility yet :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was having online chats with Kelly a few weeks ago, she was having none of it.., perhaps she went off for a doughnut :p

I was pretending to be from other DCA's asking them to confirm security questions etc...:D

 

Did you screen print the convos?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...