Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Unenforceability Cases on hold until further notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5350 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was assuming the test case would find for the banks, I guess.

Indeed the whole reason that Judge Halbert acted the way he did was brought about by the number of claims submitted by CMC,s and the number which are possibly going to be submitted in the future
and to try and put a stop to it probably

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I was assuming the test case would find for the banks, I guess. and to try and put a stop to it probably

 

The House of Lords has already proved the case for unenforceability the further cases will serve only to clarify some peripheral issues and provide clear directions for judges where they find similar cases.

Have a look at this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/200110-case-management-conference-mbna-new-post.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not the way it works. The whole point of precedent in general and test cases in particular with regard to statute is to interpret the requirements of Acts of Parliament. And in the case of Common LAw, it is courts not Parliament that make the law. Often, Acts of Parliament just bring together and codify principles of the Common Law.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The House of Lords has already proved the case for unenforceability the further cases will serve only to clarify some peripheral issues and provide clear directions for judges where they find similar cases.

Have a look at this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/200110-case-management-conference-mbna-new-post.html

I know, I was being ironic

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the CCA is a piece of consumer protection legislation- its objectives are crystal clear and its author has re stated his intentions with regard to s174 therefore there is little if any room for the courts to interpret this in any other way than was intended

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love irony but I just don't get it -I'm American :D

 

If you 'get' the CCA 1974 TD, & all it's implications (and you clearly do) irony should be easy to master, particularly if you read this forum; in fact it's a pre-requisite of membership! :D:D

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So "storm inna teacup" then. :)

 

If people are handing out the drinks, pass this way.

[SIZE=2][COLOR=SeaGreen][FONT=Verdana][URL="http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/"][/URL][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done - fab result

 

i have to say that i do believe that some judges are also seeing off mortgage lenders for their desire to seek repossession with a vengeance too

 

with cag and ell-ens help and others here, ive helped my friend get a good result on the possession hearing, wonderful judge who clearly liked what we presented to him, and not happy that the other side didnt bring any paperwork or figures on the 2 previous occasions

 

so i agree, it has to be a good thing in the long run,,,, it might even hinder a few of our favourite dca's in not submitting so readily their summons via northampton too

 

have a fun holiday weekend all

 

laters angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi allI have requested copies of a number of CCA's from my lenders both credit cards and loans. Some I have done myself and 4 others by a CMC. I am in an IVA.Both the ones I have requested and the ones the CMC have requested have not received any response despite 3 requests. (got involved with CMC before finding this brilliant site). The CMC is now wanting to establish unenforceability utilizing a lawyer based on the agreements not being available, but want their ££495 fees (each agreement)to be paid first.What do you advise, the letters sent by me have been based on the recommended format of correspondents on this site. The date of all the first letters requesting copies of the CCA's was April 29th 2009 Thanks for readingHenderson50

Edited by henderson50
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi allI have requested copies of a number of CCA's from my lenders both credit cards and loans. Some I have done myself and 4 others by a CMC. I am in an IVA.Both the ones I have requested and the ones the CMC have requested have not received any response despite 3 requests. (got involved with CMC before finding this brilliant site). The CMC is now wanting to establish unenforceability utilizing a lawyer based on the agreements not being available, but want their ££495 fees (each agreement)to be paid first.What do you advise, the letters sent by me have been based on the recommended format of correspondents on this site. The date of all the first letters requesting copies of the CCA's was April 29th 2009 Thanks for readingHenderson50

 

Hi Henderson,

 

I'm sure this will get the attention of the mods fairly soon so I suggest you start a new thread for each of your claims and post a link so we can all help out.

 

Otherwise this thread will get lost.

 

Sorry to be a pedant but the discussion on this thread is important to me and I would like to keep it on track.

 

Post a link to your new threads and I (and others, I'm sure) will hop over and help if we can.

 

Stubie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi allI have requested copies of a number of CCA's from my lenders both credit cards and loans. Some I have done myself and 4 others by a CMC. I am in an IVA.Both the ones I have requested and the ones the CMC have requested have not received any response despite 3 requests. (got involved with CMC before finding this brilliant site). The CMC is now wanting to establish unenforceability utilizing a lawyer based on the agreements not being available, but want their ££495 fees (each agreement)to be paid first.What do you advise, the letters sent by me have been based on the recommended format of correspondents on this site. The date of all the first letters requesting copies of the CCA's was April 29th 2009 Thanks for readingHenderson50

 

It might be best if you start your own thread for this and get expert advice from the peeps on here rather than get 'lost' on this one. :wink:

 

If you are confident and believe you can get all the help you need from here you may wish to save your pennies and go it alone but that would be up to you. Lots of people have and are succeeding with the halp and support given here but it's up to the individual.

 

Bit slow on the enter key.....Snap !

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again not wishing to be pedantic. Southern Pacific Loans Limited does not exist. It is a trading name of Southern Pacific Mortgages Limited. Some of the papers in the case were issued in the T/A name and some in SPML's name. In fact the original summons the SPML name was used. The order is incorrect but the copy you have is the unsealed version (guessing that is)

 

Hi Wigeon,

 

I think you are pretty close to the Chester action.

 

If so, are you able to give us a status update on HHJ Halbart's activities

 

Sorry if I'm mixing you up with someone else

 

Stubie

Link to post
Share on other sites

massive piece of kit angel!!

 

 

hiya,,,did i say something wrong?? :confused:

 

or ?

 

have a fun day laters angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi allI have requested copies of a number of CCA's from my lenders both credit cards and loans. Some I have done myself and 4 others by a CMC. I am in an IVA.Both the ones I have requested and the ones the CMC have requested have not received any response despite 3 requests. (got involved with CMC before finding this brilliant site). The CMC is now wanting to establish unenforceability utilizing a lawyer based on the agreements not being available, but want their ££495 fees (each agreement)to be paid first.What do you advise, the letters sent by me have been based on the recommended format of correspondents on this site. The date of all the first letters requesting copies of the CCA's was April 29th 2009 Thanks for readingHenderson50

 

Without wanting to cause offence, I think you're barking up the wrong tree here. (In the nicest possible way, of course!)

 

Most on CAG wouldn't use a CMC at all - there are plenty of threads around to say why - as you can do the work yourself with help from experienced CAGgers that have been there and done that. (Including me!)

 

The advice to start a new thread, probably one for each of your "agreements" is good advice.

 

If you're unsure how to start a new thread, check out the "Beginners Guide to CAG" in my signature...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5350 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...