Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Whatever the nuances of the law, they will be lost on OPS, who like the rest of the PPcs never bother to get planning permission, ever. When they get a new contract they don't want to delay issuing PCNs by deigning to follow the law, especially as the period when they take over and the parking restrictions are new is the time when they can catch most drivers out.
    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mickey against natwest part one


MichaelHill
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6332 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have been looking through the forums for past couple of weeks whilst i was getting my own info together and i did my schedules last night along with initial letter, can someone tell me wether i should drop it all into my own branch or send it somewhere in particular please.

Kind Regards

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent mine recorded delivery, but then forgot to sign it (do'h!). They wrote back and I went into the branch to sign.

 

General consensus on the site is sent it recorded delivery (signed) or take it into the branch and get a receipt for it. Either way they know you can prove they got it.

 

Pl

SNATCHWEST and NOBBETS no scare me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well after 15 days of initial letter going in i recieved an offer of about 50% of claim. Am now going to send refusal letter, should i get moneyclaim started straight away or see if they come back with better offer 1st with the threat of court being given in this refusal letter. Any ideas on what to say in refusal letter would be extremely gratefully recieved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Myself and my partner sent our LBA to natwest just 3 days ago and have got the reply today which reads

 

I Regret that there is little i can add constructivley to previous comments but having reviewed your account i can find no instance where charges have been applied when they were not properly due. They have all been associated with a lack of covering funds in the account at the time they were presented for payment. Accordingly the charges that have been applied to your account should stand.

That said, in hope of forging a compomise and settlement with you an offer of £1605.50 was proposed by our Llanishen Branch as a gesture of goodwill and without admission of error or liability. This would be paid on the basis of a full and final settlement. I know you have declined this offer but it is not to be increased. If on reflection you decide to accept the offer please return to the etc

Much of the recent media coverage on bank charges has been fuelled by the office of fair trading investigation earlier this year, but that was limited to the administration charges on credit card accounts and did not extent to include bank charges.

We have considered the office of fair trading statement of 5th April 2006 and do not accept its findings in relation to the setting of credit card fee's. We are concerned that the office of fair trading has publicly called into question the setting of charges applied to other products, including current accounts. The office of fair trading has restricted its investigation to credit cards and made no attempt to consult with RBS group or the industry in relatio to other entirly different products.

Its dissapointing you are considering legal action, etc...

Stuart Wigley

Customer Relations

Starting to get twitchy now and dont know wether to accept or go all the way. They haven't offered my partner anything for her account, which makes me feel that i should fight the both claims and joint account all the way. What should i do ????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang in there Mickey, thats standard practice to try and fob you off with a part refund. Its ALL yours and they know it!!!

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take your time on this, which is something I didn't do.

 

Go to jonni2bad's link for how to lay out particulars. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/34887-5-money-claim-line.html

 

Good luck!

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right b4 i do this all the letters i have sent have been about my 2 accounts with natwest, i have sent 2 seperate schedules but have included them both on my letter, showing the total for the both accounts together.

 

Do i need to have seperate claims for the accounts or can i put the two accounts into the one case. AGHHHHH, i wish i was legally minded.

 

I also have a joint account we are doing and my partner has 2 accounts so we will be busy as hell on MCOL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The time for talking ends here, today i start the MCOL for myself, my partner and also our joint.

 

As we are now adding the interest onto the claim do i now need to send a copy of the schedule with the interest as they have only had it without it on before.

 

Thanks for responses in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send 2 copies of your schedule of charges, clearly marked with your claim no. + a brief covering letter asking for them to be filed with your claim to:

 

The Court Manager,

Money Claim Online

Northampton County Court

21-27 St. Katharine's Street

Northampton

NN1 2LH

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

(Your Name) –v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a schedule of penalty charges taken from me by the defendant, along with interest claimed at the annual rate of 8% pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act. The interest in addition to the amount in charges equates to the total amount of my claim, namely £(AMOUNT).

 

I respectfully request that the enclosed schedule should be attached to the particulars of my claim.

Yours Faithfully

 

When you receive the Notice of Acknowledgement send a copy to the bank’s solicitors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mickey,

 

I note that you received an offer from your branch for 50% of the charges, i am at LBA stage so thinking of sending this to my local branch manager?!

 

Is this what you did to get initial offer?

 

Cheers

 

I got my offer after the 1st letter, which was sent to the customer relations manager but recieved offer from local branch. My partner recieved hers from person we sent it to but as yet has not recieved any offers. She sent LBA to CR manager again and me to the local branch, both got replies from Stuart Wigley, me re offering the 50% and her nothing. So you might as well send LBA to CR manager as it will be passed to relevant Dept anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have had a CPR 18 request from Cobetts, i have got the letter -

 

I Acknowledge the receipt of the defence posted on behalf of National Westminster Bank plc.

I am not prepared at this stage to answer the CPR Part 18 Request. I anticipate that the claim will be allocated to the small claims track and would not then expect to have to deal with a Part 18 request since these are specifically excluded under Part 27 unless the court specifically orders me to do so of its own initiative

Furthermore I consider that the CPR part 18 request is intimidatory and I intend to bring the intimidation to the notice of the court. However, for clarity, I confirm the charges I am claiming were applied to the following account:

Account Name:

Account number:

Sort Code:

 

Please also find enclosed a breakdown of all charges I am claiming.

Yours Faithfully

 

but does this cover this part

 

2:2 in relation to each charge, please clarify the following (a) is it the case of the claimant the same should not have been charged? (b) if yes please explain why the claimant contends that the same should not have been charged? ©If no, is it the case of the claimant that the same should not have been charged in this amount? (d)if yes please explain why the claimant contends that the same should not have beem charged in this amount and identify the sum the claimant contends should have been charged (e) if no please state the claimants case.

 

3 In your claim you state that the charges are "unforeceable under the UTCCR 1999, the UCTA 1977 and the common law.

 

4. Plaese specify all of the facts relied on by the claimant in support of the contetions in paragragh 3 above, and in pareticular please identify (a) the sections of the UCTA 1977 (b) the regulations of the UCTCR 1999("the regulations) and © the principles of common law relied upon by the claimant in alleging that the contractual provisions referred to are unenforceable. Please also identify the contractual provisions that the claimant alleges are unenforceable by reference to UCTA? the regulations.

 

Sorry this post is so long but as you appreciate i need to make sure i dont make any mistakes here. Must answer this week.

 

Thanks in advance

Mickey Hill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes send this response to the cpr18 request along with a further copy of your schedule.

 

You don't have to answer this unless it's requested by the courts, which it hasn't been.

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...