Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

County Court Claim form


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5489 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Today I received a claim form from Northampton county court bulk centre - what a joke that is - addressed to my 'person'. It was regarding a credit card from GE Money, I wrote to them about a month ago requesting a copy of the contract and heard nothing (along with previous letters I had written to them making offers of payment before I was enlightened about all this stuff).

 

The claimant is not GE Money who I had the card with but 'CL Finance' who I have no contract with at all. It also has a solicitor's address so they are claiming £80 solicitor's costs too, and 'signed' Howard Cohen & co, although that is just typed on the form and not signed at all. I am not sure whether I defend all of this claim or 'contest jurisdiction'.

 

 

Particulars of claim:

'The Claimant's claim is for the sum of 1703.82 being monies due from the Defendant to the Claimant under a regulated credit agreement between the Defendant and GE Capital Bank Limited under reference **************** and assigned to the Claimant on the 19th February, 2009 notice of which has been given to the Defendant.

 

'The Defendant has failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served upon the Defendant pursuant to Section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

'The Claimant claims the sum of 1703.82.'

 

The total amount claimed is 1858.82. (1858.82 what I wonder - no £ sign there so could get really pedantic!)

 

I have ordered Patricia's book but any advice before it arrives will be gratefully received. xx

This e-book is what got me started http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf

 

This short film opened my eyes

http://www.flixya.com/video/1164060/Money_As_Debt_-_Forex

 

In truth we can find peace and in unity we can cause change

http://www.tpuc.org/

Link to post
Share on other sites

This all sounds so familiar - I bet you haven't received any notices of assignment or anything; expect these in the next few days.

 

This is becoming a common problem with GE/CL Finance/Cohen, buying debts and going straight to court even without a letter before action. Have a look at these threads to familiarise yourself with their tactics.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/192657-howard-cohen-oh-dear.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/196701-ge-assign-debt-cl.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/192263-cl-finance-issue-court.html

 

More help will follow, I promise! Looks like they have sold it off rather than comply with your CCA request - we'll get this defended for you.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Welcome to CAG.

 

Acknowledge service and state that you intend to defend the whole claim.

 

Send for the CCA from the Original Creditor.

 

You will then need to send an SAR to Howard Cohen & Co.

 

The letters are in this post -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-2128223.html

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Donkey and supasnooper, I am gradually working my way round the forums, looking forward to giving and receiving help and advice! :)

This e-book is what got me started http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf

 

This short film opened my eyes

http://www.flixya.com/video/1164060/Money_As_Debt_-_Forex

 

In truth we can find peace and in unity we can cause change

http://www.tpuc.org/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Welcome to CAG.

 

Acknowledge service and state that you intend to defend the whole claim.

 

Send for the CCA from the Original Creditor.

 

You will then need to send an SAR to Howard Cohen & Co.

 

The letters are in this post -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-2128223.html

 

 

Hi supasnooper. Isn't it the other way round? SAR to original creditor, GE, and CCA to CL Finance? Usually causes them the most trouble...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send for the CCA from the Original Creditor.

 

You will then need to send an SAR to Howard Cohen & Co.

 

The letters are in this post -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-2128223.html

 

Since legal action has already started I would suggest that you send a cpr 31.14 request instead.

 

The above actions are more appropriate for when legal action has not commenced.

 

As the others have said, you'll have no problem defending this.

 

So, acknowledge receipt of the claim form and return it saying that you will defend the full amount. You will then have 33 days from the date on the front of the claim form to put in an initial defence. Don't worry about that now though - you've got another month.

 

You do need to send the cpr 31.14 letter to the solicitor's address as soon as possible.

 

regards

 

nicklea

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had one of these from Howard Cohen & Co on behalf of CL Financial. The original account was with MBNA and already have a copy of the agreement which I believe may be unenforceable - I'm still waiting for advice on that on another thread.

 

I presume that the best course of action is still to acknowledge the claim and indicate that I wish to defend; send a cpr 31.14 and wait to see what they have got? is there any risk in this approach if it turns out that you don't have a good defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again everyone, just to get this clear I send the CPR 31.14 to Howard Cohen but do I send anything to GE or CL as well?

This e-book is what got me started http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf

 

This short film opened my eyes

http://www.flixya.com/video/1164060/Money_As_Debt_-_Forex

 

In truth we can find peace and in unity we can cause change

http://www.tpuc.org/

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCA is effectively part of CPR31. If you want to do belt and braces, there's no harm (but for £10) in an SAR. You never know what discrepancies might turn up.

 

Really tho, the CPR request should get you all you need; chances are they'll fail to comply. That's the next stage tho.

 

Try and relax and get a good night's sleep - you're in safe hands with the peeps on CAG. They're better than any sleeping pill :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Donkey, I've copied the letter ready to print out and send off in the morning. :)

This e-book is what got me started http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf

 

This short film opened my eyes

http://www.flixya.com/video/1164060/Money_As_Debt_-_Forex

 

In truth we can find peace and in unity we can cause change

http://www.tpuc.org/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I got a computer generated letter, not signed just a stamp saying 'Howard Cohen & Co' and not even addressed to anyone although my name and address is on the top of the letter. This is how it goes:

 

Our ref: ****/******

 

02 May 2009

 

Miss Trollope

123 The Street

Anytown

BA1 1AA

 

Dear,

 

Re: GE Capital - ****************

 

We refer to your recent letter in which you have made a request for information under the Civil Procedure Rule 31.14.

 

We are not obliged to provide this information under C.P.R. 31.14. This claim is for less than £5000.00 and therefore the rule is not applicable. We can confirm that any disclosure will be dealt with as directed by the court. The Particulars of Claim should be sufficient for you to reply to the claim form.

 

We trust this clarifies the matter.

 

Yours sincerely

 

*stamp*

 

Howard Cohen & co.

 

 

Any ideas what to do next? Thanks in advance. :)

This e-book is what got me started http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf

 

This short film opened my eyes

http://www.flixya.com/video/1164060/Money_As_Debt_-_Forex

 

In truth we can find peace and in unity we can cause change

http://www.tpuc.org/

Link to post
Share on other sites

As usual, the letter is total cr*p. The case hasn't been assigned to any track yet! Nice to know HC are in touch with the judge.:rolleyes:

 

Only the court can decide if the claim being below £5000 is relevant, and only the court will assign the track - small claims or fast track - not Howard Cohen. This all works in your favour if it actually goes to court.

 

In the meantime, they are obliged to comply, but they won't. When it comes to AQ, if it does, you'll have to ask the court for specific directions and force them to comply with your request. We'll use this letter in an 'embarrassed' defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but what is AQ and what is my next move? :confused:

This e-book is what got me started http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf

 

This short film opened my eyes

http://www.flixya.com/video/1164060/Money_As_Debt_-_Forex

 

In truth we can find peace and in unity we can cause change

http://www.tpuc.org/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi the Allocation Questionaire is what you will receive from the court and you have to fill it in, the judge will make an order telling you when it has to be handed in by. There are some excellent threads on here with the info on how to fill one in on them, thats how I filled mine in. It's quite simple really....I will see if I can find the one I used......

 

fed up

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is in sections from A to I, and heres directions on how to fill them in.......but you wont need them untill you get an AQ from court.

A - Settlement

1 Yes (because it eliminates the need to answer question 4)

2 Yes (shows willing)

3 No (because it needs a fee)

4 Leave blank

 

B - Location Of Trial

 

No (already transferred)

 

C - Tick No and write "Please see attached section C"

 

Then on a separate sheet of paper type this, and head it section C

 

"This case is not covered by any approved pre-action protocol. I have requested the claimant provide information in my CPR Part 18 request, but to date the claimant has not provided the documents I require to investigate this claim"

 

D - Case management information

 

What amount of the claim is in dispute - fill in the full amount

 

Applications - No

 

Witnesses - Enter your own name, and "All" to 'witness to which facts'.

 

Experts - No to first question - leave the rest blank

 

Track - Fast Track (as claim is over £5,000) - Leave the other box blank as Fast Track is normal

 

E - Trial or Final Hearing

 

2 hours

 

(Only you know if there are any dates you cannot attend)

 

F - Proposed Directions

 

Yes to question 1, No to question 2.

 

WORK ON THE DIRECTIONS TO ATTACH LATER

 

G - Costs

 

Leave blank

 

H - Fee

 

Leave blank

 

I - Other Information

 

Yes to questions 1 and 2. Sent today. No to Applications and leave blank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks that is brilliant, when will they send out the AQ? As Howard Cohen haven't complied with my request can I apply to have the proceedings struck out or do I still need to file a defence?

This e-book is what got me started http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf

 

This short film opened my eyes

http://www.flixya.com/video/1164060/Money_As_Debt_-_Forex

 

In truth we can find peace and in unity we can cause change

http://www.tpuc.org/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I did that straightaway, I've got about 19 days left to file my defence.

This e-book is what got me started http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf

 

This short film opened my eyes

http://www.flixya.com/video/1164060/Money_As_Debt_-_Forex

 

In truth we can find peace and in unity we can cause change

http://www.tpuc.org/

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a letter from HC today saying 'you will now have received a County Court Claim blahdeblahdeblah. If you have already responded to the claim please ignore this letter.' Well they know I received it and responded because they ignored my request for a copy of the agreement.

 

What do I need to put in my defence - is there a template anywhere?

 

Thanks in advance guys. :)

This e-book is what got me started http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf

 

This short film opened my eyes

http://www.flixya.com/video/1164060/Money_As_Debt_-_Forex

 

In truth we can find peace and in unity we can cause change

http://www.tpuc.org/

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've liftted this off another thread and adapted it - do you think I should attach a copy of my CPR request and their reply to my defence?

IN THE NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT

 

 

Case No: XXXXXXXX

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

 

 

CL Finance Ltd

 

 

 

 

Claimant

 

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

 

 

 

Miss Trollope

 

 

 

Defendant

 

 

 

 

 

DEFENCE

 

 

 

 

1 Miss Trollope of Trollopeville am the defendant in this action and make the following statement as my defence to the claim made by xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

2. Except where otherwise mentioned in this defence, I neither admit nor deny any allegation made in the claimant's Particulars of Claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof.

3. It is denied that the Claimant served upon the Defendant a default notice pursuant to section 87(1) of The Act and which was in prescribed form and compliant with the provisions of section 88 of the Act.

 

4. The Claimant's Particulars of Claim do not appear to disclose any legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the Claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the court's attention to the following matters:

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written Agreement referred to, the method the Claimant calculated any outstanding sums due, or any Default Notices issued required for the Claimant to have a legitimate right of action under the purported written Agreement or any other matters necessary to substantiate the Claimant’s claim;

 

b) A copy of the purported written Agreement that the Claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form;

 

c) A copy of the purported Default Notice cited in the Particulars of Claim, and as required by s87(1) Consumer Credit Act (1974), has not been attached to the claim form;

 

d) No copies of statements relating to the Agreement have been included with the claim form and no particulars have been offered supporting the Claimant's claims of my indebtedness to them.

 

5. Further to the case, on 29 April 2009 I requested the disclosure of information pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules, which is vital to this case from the Claimant. The information requested amounted to copies of the Credit Agreement referred to in the particulars of claim and any default or termination notices.

 

6. The claimant has failed to comply with my request for disclosure entirely and it is suggested that such failure highlights that there is no case for me to answer.

 

7. Since the claimant has failed to comply with the request for disclosure as outlined in point 4, it is requested the court consider striking out the claimant statement of claim as failing to disclose reasonable grounds for bringing the claim and there is no case to answer.

 

8. In view of the matters pleaded above, the Defendant respectfully requests that the Court gives consideration as to whether the Claimant’s Particulars of Claim should be struck out as disclosing no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim, and/or that it fails to comply with CPR Part 16.

 

9. In the alternative if the Court decides not to strike out the Claimant’s case, in order for the Defendant to determine that the documents the Claimant claims to be relying upon are properly executed and contain the required prescribed terms and correct figures as to make such an Agreement enforceable by virtue of s.87 Consumer Credit Act (1974), the Defendant respectfully requests that the Court orders full disclosure of the following documents pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules:

 

a) A copy of the executed Agreement as referred to in the Particulars of Claim, containing the prescribed terms under Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) and signed in the prescribed manner by both the debtor and creditor;

 

b) A copy of the terms & conditions as referred to in, and in force at the time of, any such executed Agreement;

 

c) A full breakdown of how the sum claimed has been calculated;

 

d) A copy of any Default Notice as referred to in the Particulars of Claim and issued under the terms of any such executed Agreement;

 

e) Any other documents the Claimant seeks to rely on.

 

10. Alternatively, if the Court is not in agreement with point 8, I respectfully request a stay in proceedings until such time as the Claimant complies with the requests outlined in point 9 above or until the Court orders its compliance with the same. I will then be in a position to file a fully particularised Defence and Counterclaim and will seek the Court's permission to amend my statement of case accordingly.

 

 

Statement of Truth

 

 

I xxxxxxxxxxx, The Defendant, believe the above statement to be true and factual

 

 

 

Signed:

 

 

Dated:

This e-book is what got me started http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf

 

This short film opened my eyes

http://www.flixya.com/video/1164060/Money_As_Debt_-_Forex

 

In truth we can find peace and in unity we can cause change

http://www.tpuc.org/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Misstrollop,

Sorry, but I cant yet offer any assistance with your defence as I'm at the same stage as you with these Muppets.

You might however wish to know that you are not the only one they play games with over their obligations under the CPR. Here is the response that they sent me (incidentally my case is over £5K):

Dear Mr LittleBert

RE: CL Finance Ltd - £xxx

We refer to previous communications in this matter.

We refer to your recent letter in which you have made a request for information under the Civil Procedure Rules.

As this matter is now subject to a County Court Judgment we are not obliged to provide this information, and would advise that the particulars of claim detailed in the County Court Claim Form were sufficient to allow you to respond accordingly.

Not withstanding the above, we have requested a copy of the original agreement from our clients’ predecessors and will forward this onto you on receipt. If you are in any doubt as to your position in this matter, please seek your own legal advice.

If you wish to discuss this matter please telephone 0870 75 1 3200.

Yours faithfully,

Howard Cohen & Co

I've followed your thread with interest, so I hope you don’t think I'm trying to hijack it and wont mind if I just post a link to my own:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mbna/158071-littlebert-mbna.html

If I come up with anything that I think may be useful to you, then I'll post back here.

Good Luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...