Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
    • please stop posting up unnecessary unnamed screenshot files  you've done it throughout your threads and we have to renamed them. RENAME THE FILE before you upload if its just text information like a defence or a claim history or a link to a previous post  type it here not by an unnamed screenshot attachment  . sorry NM but you've been here dealing with PPC claims since 2021 somehow you always manage to screw up.......or do totally the opposite of std repeated advice on 10'000 of PPC threads here you are your own worst enemy... dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help - RBS Mint want a fight!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4921 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...

Seems RBS Mint are concentrating their efforts on others at the moment. Anyone know at what point they regard a debt as being uncollectable and they back off?

Is there any indication when they get to this stage in the records sent in an SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Letter received today from AIC entitled 'Out of court settlement'. Scarey huh!

They say it has been assigned to them.

The way this all works really bugs me. The correct procedure should be RBS notify me they have assigned the debt first, otherwise how do I know AIC have not obtained the details illegally and are asking me for the money to be paid to them without anything to back it up.

They say my account is frozen with no interest, solicitors fees or court costs being added.

They want the full balance paid 'within 10 days of postmark' of the letter. Tricky, as the envelope does not have a postmark, just a prepaid Royal mail sticker and the usual orange markings. The letter itself is dated 9/11/2009 so 10 days is today, so that's helpful!

Anyone suggest a suitable response? Keep it clean!

Thanks in advance.

Exchange

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been reading threads. Should I have received a 'Deed of Assignment' followed by a 'Notice of Assignment'? Are these supposed to be in a prescribed form?

Account was terminated back at the beginning of June after receiving a default notice which said 17 days from date of notice without specifying a date, so potentially defective and therefore rescission of contract. Given the situation can they even pass it on to a DCA, I know they can(!) but legally?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi exchange

 

we did find some rules regarding posting outide the UK but in the EU which may be of some interest to you although my big credit problem is from Amex who have issued me an SD which I didn't receive until it was over the limit to challenge so bits of this may be relevant to you and some bits not. I've only just begun learning all this so sorry if a bit vague but this is what I found.

 

1. On the Insolvency Service website there is a PDF download on Stautory Demands and section 5 talks about serving an SD abroad. It increases the time limit from 18 and 21 days to 22 and 28 days. It also went on to say that there were limitations on what could be done depending on which European country you are, it didn't provide any deeper detail than that but it got me thinking.

 

I then found some stuff from the Ministry of Justice under the heading PRACTICE DIRECTION – INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS again because I have an SD but I think the principle must be applicable to you too and it says under serving an SD abroad

 

When a statutory demand is to be served out of the jurisdiction, the time limits of 21 days and 18 days respectively referred to in the demand must be amended. For this purpose reference should be made to the table set out in the practice direction supplementing Section III of CPR Part 6.

 

10.6

 

A creditor should amend the statutory demand as follows:

(1) For any reference to 18 days there must be substituted the appropriate number of days set out in the table plus 4 days, and

 

(2) for any reference to 21 days there must be substituted the appropriate number of days in the table plus 7 days.

 

Attention is drawn to the fact that in all forms of the statutory demand the figure 18 and the figure 21 occur in more than one place.

 

 

So I then hunted for the table it mentioned and found a load of information regarding countries where they agree to process servers and ones where they don't etc and a table of days for correspondence to be replied to.

 

 

 

PRACTICE DIRECTION – SERVICE OUT OF THE JURISDICTION - Ministry of Justice

 

To be honest I got a bit boggled in the end but I'd bet that the bustard DCA's don't pay any attention to these postage rules - I haven't found anything on them anywhere else in the forum yet and certainly mine haven't.

 

Good luck and will follow with interest how you get on if I find anything else which may be useful I'll ping it your way but please bear in mind I am very much a novice on this unlike some of the members who have been giving brilliant support.

 

Cheers

 

Hestia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hestia

 

Thanks for taking the time to post this info. Really appreciate it.

 

Having looked through it and the annex I'm still not sure if it covers a 'Default Notice' although the requirement to allow 21 days in most cases for legal documents does help make an argument for not enough time being given when outside the UK by any (but one) of the companies I am battling.

 

You are the first person to point out any rules regarding this so thanks again and best of luck to you too.

Edited by exchange
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Exchange,

 

I'm not sure about the rules on service outside of the UK but I think you can download them from the Ministry of Justice website at Civil Procedure Rules Homepage - Ministry of Justice

 

If the debt has been assigned to another party by a Deed of Assignment, you should receive notice of the assignment. But that notice does not have to be in a particular format. The case law is that you should be made aware of the assignment with 'reasonable certainty'. The relevant case is Van Lynn Developments Ltd v Pelias Construction Co Ltd [1968] 3 All ER 824.

The Deed is the contract between RBS and the debt collector (AIC). The Van Lynn case also provides that you may ask for a copy of the Deed of Assignment to check that the details of the assignment are correct in the notice to you. If the details such as the date have been incorrectly stated (not just omitted) the Notice is invalid. The relevant case is W F Harrison & Co Ltd v Burke and another [1956] 2 All ER 169.

 

However, I am not sure RBS will have assigned the deb to AIC. I have had a similar run in with RBS Mint. AIC were the second (and rudest) DCA appointed of five who have written to me so far on behalf of RBS since March 2006. But since I asked for a copy CCA of the first DCA which RBS have not supplied, I have just written back to each one to tell them that fact and they have stopped any further action. AIC may only have been asked to collect the debt and if my experience is anything to go by, you have a long way to go yet.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Docman

 

Thanks for the link and info and for the warning. Sounds like a good idea to ask for a copy of the Deed of Assignment.

Seems logical to me that the assignment should be notified to me by RBS in the first place. Why should I pay any money to a company who contacts me out of the blue claiming to have the right to demand payment on behalf of someone else? I know it can happen like this, it annoys me that it is allowed.

The letter from AIC clearly states that the 'outstanding balance has been assigned' to AIC.

Perhaps as I am outside the UK RBS think I am more trouble than it is worth for them, so they have sold the debt on for something (small amount I hope) and claimed the tax relief I believe they get on bad debts.

Perhaps they think having 'International' in the name will worry me. Having checked the Companies House register, Google and the OFT, AIC are owned by a Canadian company but have no connection to where I am. They have a full CCL in date.

Think I will be writing to them and RBS.

Thanks again.

Exchange

Link to post
Share on other sites

after dealing with rbs previously i would adv that you should contact the cccs. these are a free company which can help with getting your finances back in line. rbs insolvency team who deal with the debt collectors for example aic. if correspondance is sent to aic they do not forward this onto rbs nor do they adv them of receiving this. if you do decide to go to the cccs, they are alot better than payplan as they pay all of their accounts on the same day each month so for example they pay on the 25th.

 

with regards to a section 78 request which is your agreement, even if they are unable to provide this, this will only mean that they cannot take court action against you however they can continue chasing you. the team at rbs that deal with s78 requests do not have a contact number so you should just send this direct to the team below.

 

i found the insolvency and client support team at rbs group extreamly helpful you can contact them on 0845 300 5109 this is a direct line for the team that deals with the debt collectors. although they would be unable to stop the debt collectors they can give you advise on what the next stages should be for example with my case they advised me to send in a financial statement to aic as they cannot ignore this. also send a copy to the rbs team direct so that in future if for any reason aic continue they will have this which they can forward on.

 

hope this helps benson1234

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...