Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
    • Right that's exactly why so many drivers got caught, it had been that way for many years then suddenly changes with no warning
    • The hearing is 25th June, I have downloaded items to different organisations previously but they do it a simple way and I just cross out private things with a felt tip and sent to an email address.  I have looked at the instructions for CAG it seems extremely complicated especially this about having to use a system MSPAINT.EXE that removes your personal information. I am hoping one of my Grandchildren understands things to give me help, I have shown one of my daughters she said she does not understand the instructions. I have a PC and I mainly use a lap top, as previously advised I only understand the straightforward things, sending an email and using my scanner to send a document that I save in a file or send it to an email. I will try and find someone to help me, thanks for your help you have given me so far appreciate it        
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Need help, bailiff came round yesterday out of the blue!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5484 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good question.

 

I'd say from the point of view of contract law that you have no contract with the bailiff - I can go into reasons for that if you like. So his fees are nothing to do with you.

 

The bailiff does likely have a contract with the council. He is free to ask them for any fees he thinks are due. Again - nothing to do with you.

 

But enforcing his contract with the council by making you pay him is very dodgy legal territory. Can't be done as far as I can tell. You have no responsibility towards him. You didn't invite him round, he isn't a postman and he is not a passer-by looking for directions. So long as a large chunk of brickwork doesn't fall off your building and hit him on the head you have no legal obligation to the man. (And I'm not even sure about the brickwork).

 

Thats the theory. Perhaps someone with more experience of this in practice would care to comment.

 

See also this page for a statutory declaration for your girlfriend to fill out..

 

http://www.consumerwiki.co.uk/index.php/Bailiffs:_Useful_Template_Letters

Edited by felicity2009
Link to post
Share on other sites

A visit from the bailiffs is iminent according to the letters I have received. I am feeling quite nervous about this. Can anyone tell me what happens when they call, what do they say to you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good question.

 

I'd say from the point of view of contract law that you have no contract with the bailiff - I can go into reasons for that if you like. So his fees are nothing to do with you.

 

The bailiff does likely have a contract with the council. He is free to ask them for any fees he thinks are due. Again - nothing to do with you.

 

But enforcing his contract with the council by making you pay him is very dodgy legal territory. Can't be done as far as I can tell. You have no responsibility towards him. You didn't invite him round, he isn't a postman and he is not a passer-by looking for directions. So long as a large chunk of brickwork doesn't fall off your building and hit him on the head you have no legal obligation to the man. (And I'm not even sure about the brickwork).

 

Thats the theory. Perhaps someone with more experience of this in practice would care to comment.

 

See also this page for a statutory declaration for your girlfriend to fill out..

 

Bailiffs: Useful Template Letters - Consumer Wiki

 

I received a letter from them confirming that the council had been paid in full (there were two seperate liabilities) and that their fees were outstanding and needed paying ASAP or else they would PROCEED!

 

Well after i stopped laughing at the proceed bit i wrote to the council again asking for confirmation in writing that due to the fraudulent fees being ask for that i don't have to pay them. And that if i don't receive a response i will write to my MP to investigate (that should stir up the head of revenue a bit).

 

I say fraudulent as first visit the bailiff left two notes (folded into each other nicely) in my post box, one for each liability which included fees on both for first and second visits. SO charging in advance and also in duplicate due to same day visits which i've read only bring one charge and not one for each liability. Also that i phoned him and he refused any payment unless he could get a walk in possession or i pay all of it including the fraudulent charges that day. Next day i paid the council direct in full on line, lol.

 

I also copied that letter to the bailiffs stating that i would await response from my MP in regards to the charges. And that any action to collect will be deemed as a criminal action under section 2 of the 2006 fraud act, due to misrepresentation of the actual charges.

 

The bailiff did make a second visit (after the council had been paid in full) and carefully slipped the second note for both liabilities in the post box without attempting to knock (as my girlfriend was in the house at the time) and crept away. I've since read that a charge cannot be made for such a visit as he failed to attempt reasponable contact and acted unprofessionably to say the least.

 

Will await a council response!

Link to post
Share on other sites

that their fees were outstanding and needed paying ASAP or else they would PROCEED!

 

Is it just me or does that sound like a 419 advanced fee fraud? You know, those [problem] emails you get where theres always millions waiting for you but you have to pay fee after fee after fee.. I love winding those people up. ('scambaiting'). They get extra annoyed if they think at the last minute you spent 'their' money on something else (I like to send pictures of expensive cars and large piles of talc).

 

If I were you, I'd tell then that you had all their money, but sadly, you just spent it on a large dog. You are not able to afford food for it and when did you say you were coming round again Mr Bailiff?

Link to post
Share on other sites

WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN

 

Had a letter from the council wiating for me when i got home last night. They finally replied to my first letter i sent them two weeks ago. It cleary states that in this circumstance they have requested the cases back from the Bailiffs and that they will cover the bailiffs costs.

 

So i'm all clear. Anyone comes knocking now is a thief and will be treated as such. :)

 

I only hope that when they get me last letter (sent on monday) that they in fact won't pay the charges themselves as they were fraudulent and take criminal action against them. We can hope anyway.

 

Thankyou for all the wonderful advice and support from this forum, couldn't have got through it otherwise. It's just amazing how all the storys on here strengthen you and build your confidence in dealing with them. They win by bullying and intimidation. Hold firm, don't waver. Be strong and also be armed with the law. I've got a file at home next to the door of all the paper work that this site has provided. What bailiff's can and can't do, what the police have to do, etc... stand up to them.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...