Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
    • OK. Thank you all for the input.  I'll ignore their letters of demand but NEVER ignore a letter of claim. I'm bracing myself for the stress as their demands £££ goes up and the case gets sent to debt collectors. 
    • OK.  It was worth a try. Their case is still pants and they have broken their own Code of Practice numerous times.
    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Marlin/Mortimer CCJ HFC Marbles Card - Set Aside Help **WON plus Costs**


Spamalot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5175 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi R&B,

 

Not one of my applications has had a time allocated to it... all I ever get is a covering letter saying 'It'll be dealt with at the hearing on 19th August at 2pm.... nothing else.

 

Perhaps they're giving me the whole afternoon... I now have, withdraw admission application, set aside application, and disclosure application all at the same hearing... hope the DJ doesn't have a liquid lunch before hand..:eek:...or do I? :rolleyes:

 

Spam.:)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 578
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi R&B,

 

Not one of my applications has had a time allocated to it... all I ever get is a covering letter saying 'It'll be dealt with at the hearing on 19th August at 2pm.... nothing else.

 

Perhaps they're giving me the whole afternoon... I now have, withdraw admission application, set aside application, and disclosure application all at the same hearing... hope the DJ doesn't have a liquid lunch before hand..:eek:...or do I? :rolleyes:

 

Spam.:)

 

lol...well he ll just be playing catch-up with u then:razz:.....

in all seriousness tho id be tempted to phone the court and see wots allocated. anything less than 2 hours and id say u dont think this is long enough to give u a decent hearing given the amount to get thru.

from my experience (last hearing) just the point of the CA took over 1 1/2hrs, mixed in with the procedural issues took another hour and we didnt even touch on the disclosure. depends on the DJ tho i guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi R&B,

 

Got a bit waylaid yesterday with my SAR from Halifax..

 

Thanks for the advice.. I'll give them a ring next week to find out the state of play with regards to timing.

 

Just out of interest.. when did you hear that there was going to be a rep for the other side at your original hearing?

I have no idea at the mo whether anyone is going to turn up from MC and I just wondered when you find out about these things..:confused:

 

Does the court inform you that the opp intend to object to the application or do you just find that out on the day...

 

It's all a bit puzzling to me at present and it puts 'one on the back foot somewhat' :p

 

Thanks,

 

Spam. :)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Spam

 

It certainly does seem that they're piling quite a lot of stuff up to be dealt with at your hearing!

 

I see you're following r&b's tip to phone the court next week to try and get an idea of what's going on regarding timing and allocated court time, hopefully you'll speak to someone helpful as the staff are not all of that persuasion.

 

Hopefully the Judge will realise at the outset of the hearing if the time allocated is not sufficient to get through all your stuff on the day and will order an adjournment to a later date. I know that might be inconvenient for you, but it seems some of these Judges don't give a stuff about messing people around. :(

 

Anyway, although my comments probably aren't very helpful, you've taken all the steps you can so far, so I hope everything goes well for you, you deserve it! ;)

 

I've been giving too much time to MC/M/P over the last few days :mad: so I've got to try and catch up with a few things that have been neglected and need attention, but I'll try and keep up with yours and r&b's threads, and I'll let you know any developments with mine! I think I'll put my set aside application on hold for a few days to await MCs response to my AoE opposition stuff, although I'll still be thinking about it and formulating the plan!

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my case MC wrote in objecting in a witness statement why my setasides shouldn't be granted. The witness statement was more aimed at undermining me then aimed at the court.

In the end MC didn't turn up.

The DJ was not at all impressed and granted me the set a side. I'm convinced he would hyave done anyway but you never know.

The letters from mc were aimed at pursuading me not to turn up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rob/ Jon

 

In my case MC wrote in objecting in a witness statement why my setasides shouldn't be granted.

 

Did you get a copy of that before the hearing or did you just find out on the day?

 

They've been strangely quiet as far as my case is concerned..

 

Spam. :)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Spam

 

 

They've been strangely quiet as far as my case is concerned..

 

 

 

That's because they're busy with my stuff! :rolleyes::)

 

Seriously though, they're probably overworked if people are standing up to them! Hopefully they've bitten off more than they can chew if enough people are not just rolling over and submitting to them.

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rob/ Jon

 

 

 

Did you get a copy of that before the hearing or did you just find out on the day?

 

They've been strangely quiet as far as my case is concerned..

 

Spam. :)

I got a letter first. The letter was basicly telling there was no point attending cos I was wasting my time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Just got off the phone to the court... They have allocated 20 minutes for the whole lot..:( Office said that DJ will look at all the applications and give directions on the day.

 

I asked about whether I will be informed if claimants will be represented on the day and she said I will find out at the hearing...

 

Bit miffed cos everything seems so weighted to the advantage of the claimant all the time and it's always the defendant left on the back foot waiting for the big guns to make their move..

 

Oh well, not long to wait now.

 

Spam.:)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

wouldnt get too wound up spam, i cant see how DJ will even start to make a decision given that timescale. be lucky if hes got time for the directions of all that;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Spam

 

wouldnt get too wound up spam, i cant see how DJ will even start to make a decision given that timescale. be lucky if hes got time for the directions of all that;)

 

I agree with r&b.

 

I seems almost certain that the Judge will have to order an adjournment of some sort to be able to deal with matters properly, as even if the time were to overrun it still wouldn't be sufficient.

 

I have read other threads where the Defendant has actually requested an adjournment.

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

wouldnt get too wound up spam, i cant see how DJ will even start to make a decision given that timescale. be lucky if hes got time for the directions of all that;) Yes, bit of wishful thinking on my part hoping to get a set aside in one hit and get given directions to prepare defence..

 

Hi Spam

 

 

 

I agree with r&b.

 

I seems almost certain that the Judge will have to order an adjournment of some sort to be able to deal with matters properly, as even if the time were to overrun it still wouldn't be sufficient.

 

I have read other threads where the Defendant has actually requested an adjournment. It looks as if that's what I'll have to be prepared to do if he doesn't order one himself.

 

Cheers

Rob

 

I think by the time I've got all my papers out and sat down, my 20 minutes will be up... :-| I've been looking forward to this hearing for what seems like a lifetime and now it seems as though it may drag on for a while yet!

 

Not knowing how things will pan out on the day it's difficult to decide what to give the most preparation to. I shall have to give it loads of thought.

 

Anyway, thanks for the support R&B, Rob, I really Appreciate it. ;)

 

Spam. :)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Spam

 

I think by the time I've got all my papers out and sat down, my 20 minutes will be up... :-| I've been looking forward to this hearing for what seems like a lifetime and now it seems as though it may drag on for a while yet!

 

Not knowing how things will pan out on the day it's difficult to decide what to give the most preparation to. I shall have to give it loads of thought.

 

 

If you haven't been in court before, at least the hearing will serve to give a bit of a taster!

 

Cheers

Rob

Edited by robcag
Spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you haven't been in court before, at least the hearing will serve to give a bit of a taster!

 

 

Very true!! Something to cut my teeth on...;)

 

 

Thanks,

 

Spam. :)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it this week spam?

 

Wishing you all the best....FG

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it this week spam?

 

Wishing you all the best....FG

 

Hi FG... long time no see ;) Thank you.. the case is actually in 2 weeks on the 19th.. but I'll hold on to those best wishes til then if I may.:)

 

Strange turn of events today...

 

They've been strangely quiet as far as my case is concerned..

 

They seem to have woken up!! :rolleyes:

 

Received a letter from MC today saying..

 

Without Prejudice

 

Re Phoenix V Spam

 

We write with reference to your application to Set Aside Judgement.

 

Our client is of the opinion the outstanding amount is due, however they are prepared to consent to set aside the judgement in an attempt to prevent uneccessary court action, provided you pay the amount outstanding in accordance with the terms of the enclosed Consent Order.

 

We look forward to your reply within 7 days, upon which our client's offer will expire.

 

( consent order requesting me to pay full outstanding balance... including unlawful charges on an unenforceable agreement not legally owned by them, at the same rate as the judgement enclosed)

 

 

 

:eek::eek: :D

 

I think I have them on the ropes now... any comments please?

 

Do I ignore the letter or should I write back saying thanks but no thanks?

 

Obviously I'm not going to accept their 'kind offer' but I don't want the court to think I am being unreasonable..

 

Thanks

 

 

Spam.:)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ho Spam

 

Disregard their offer you wont look unreasoable as the above cannot be introduced into proceedings anyway,WP

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Strange turn of events today...

 

 

 

They seem to have woken up!! :rolleyes:

 

Received a letter from MC today saying..

 

Without Prejudice

 

Re Phoenix V Spam

 

We write with reference to your application to Set Aside Judgement.

 

Our client is of the opinion the outstanding amount is due, however they are prepared to consent to set aside the judgement in an attempt to prevent uneccessary court action, provided you pay the amount outstanding in accordance with the terms of the enclosed Consent Order.

 

We look forward to your reply within 7 days, upon which our client's offer will expire.

 

( consent order requesting me to pay full outstanding balance... including unlawful charges on an unenforceable agreement not legally owned by them, at the same rate as the judgement enclosed)

 

 

 

:eek::eek: :D

 

I think I have them on the ropes now... any comments please?

 

Do I ignore the letter or should I write back saying thanks but no thanks?

 

Obviously I'm not going to accept their 'kind offer' but I don't want the court to think I am being unreasonable..

 

Thanks

 

 

Spam.:)

 

Hi Spam

 

A very kind offer indeed - NOT! :rolleyes:

 

It looks like they're trying to give with one hand and take back with the other - sort of. Do they really think that you are suddenly going to find the alleged outstanding balance - plus some - and just hand it over?

 

They're trippin', they probably think they're doing you a favour! :lol:

 

Perhaps you really do have them on the ropes, let's hope so!

 

Just my opinion, but I wouldn't think there would be even a remote possibility that the court would think you unreasonable in turning down their offer, after all you're trying to get this thing set aside, not trying to find another way to pay an originally unenforceable debt which you are hoping to challenge as such! :)

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ho Spam

 

Disregard their offer you wont look unreasoable as the above cannot be introduced into proceedings anyway,WP

 

Regards

 

Andy

.. Thanks Andy... thats what I wanted to hear. :)

 

Hi Rob, :)

 

Do they really think that you are suddenly going to find the alleged outstanding balance - plus some - and just hand it over?

 

May have misled you there in my post..:oops: They are suggesting I pay it back at the same rate as I'm paying the judgement.. £xx.xx per month.

 

Apart from everything else, I've paid almost £200 on applications to get this far!! Why would I suddenly want to drop it?

 

The judgement includes their costs, but their 'consent order' orders each party bear their own costs.. so they already have theirs neatly tied up in the 'outstanding balance' but I bear my own... I'm wondering which banana boat they think I arrived on.. :rolleyes:

 

Thanks Spam. :)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ho Spam

 

Disregard their offer you wont look unreasoable as the above cannot be introduced into proceedings anyway,WP

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

as andy says spam without prejudice cannot be used in court so as far as the court is concerned, its as if it were never written, making it very difficult for them to find u unreasonable....unlike them ill wager:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm wondering which banana boat they think I arrived on.. :rolleyes::D

 

They are most certainaly on the ropes Spam,it smacks of desperation to me stick to your guns and go get em I will be watching on the 19th.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Spam

 

.. Thanks Andy... thats what I wanted to hear. :) Not only have they headed their letter simply 'Without Prejudice', they can't even use it for the purposes of costs - (not headed 'WP ... save as to costs' ). But let's hope that scenario doesn't arise.

 

Hi Rob, :)

 

May have misled you there in my post.. They are suggesting I pay it back at the same rate as I'm paying the judgement.. £xx.xx per month. No, it was my fault, I didn't read it properly! :oops::oops:

 

Apart from everything else, I've paid almost £200 on applications to get this far!! Why would I suddenly want to drop it?

 

The judgement includes their costs, but their 'consent order' orders each party bear their own costs.. so they already have theirs neatly tied up in the 'outstanding balance' but I bear my own... I'm wondering which banana boat they think I arrived on.. :rolleyes:

 

Thanks Spam. :)

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're twitching spam. Stick to your guns - & then blow 'em out of the water.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...