Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

First Response Finance interim charging order


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5507 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I am so worried right now, I owe first response finance money, they havnt hassled me or anything and i have buried my head in the sand which i know isnt the right thing to do, but today i got a letter from them with somthing from the county court and land register, it states that a judgement or order was given on the 26th Feb 2009 and ordered me to pay the money, I have not heard of any of this before, and the application is going to be in court on the 27th April 2009, now the thing is, my ex wife got the same letter, and she is not happy, we have split up and the house is now sold, now im worried that the house sale will fall through cos of this, we have signed the land register change this week infact, so could this affect the sale of the house?? I dont know what to do about this and we have nearly completed on the house sale, I cant loose the house sale as the house has been on the market for 15 months. please can anyone help or advise what to do please?

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

You state you haven't moved recently. Were Court papers ever served on you at your address?

 

Any chance you could scan the letter being careful to blank out personal details so people can see exactly what FR are saying?

 

It's a little unclear from your post as to whether they have already been to Court or whether they are intending to go to Court.

 

Also first response do car finance don't they? Is this for a car and was it a loan or hp. How much was paid/owing etc.

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Scooterist007,

Sorry to hear of your problems. Did you definitely get no correspondence regarding court action prior to this?

If poss can you scan in the letters you got today (covering up all personal info) so that you can be given some good advice based on all the info.

I'm no expert but there are plenty of people here who can guide you in the right direction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they have obtained an interim charging order this will in no way affect the house sale, if the judge grants them a final charging order all that will happen is when the house is sold the profits from the sale will go to the creditor for however much the debt is hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the quick response guys, right I havnt moved for over three years and the loan was for a car, I didnt recieve any court papers except for this today, I dont think am getting all my letters, I am seeing somebody else and she has sent somthing through the post and i never got it, then she sen something via recorded delivery and was sent back stating 'does not live here' I also havnt recieved and tesco clubcard letters for quite sometime so I know I'm not getting all my mail! I cant scan the order as I havnt got a scanner sorry,

the interim charging order says:

 

on 10th march 2009, district judge considered the application of the claiment ('the judgement creditor'), from which it appears:

a) a judgement or order given on 26th feb 2009 ordered the defendent ('the judgment debtor') to pay money to the judgment creditor;

b) the amount now owing under the judgment or order is £6,133.32 (including any interest and costs); and

c) the judgment debtor is the owner of, or has benificial interest in the asset described in the schedule below;

and the court orders that

1. the interest of the judment debtor Mr (me) in the asset descrbed in the schedule below stand charged with payment of £6,133.32 together with any furthur interest becoming due and the costs of the application.

2. the application will be heard at 12.00pm on 27th april at (my local) county court when a judge will decide whether th charge created by this order should continue (with or without modification) or should be discharged.

3. the claimant is to serve: (i) the judgment debtor (ii) the co-owner or other trustees (iii) all known creditors

 

the schedule

the address of the land or property charged is (my address) the title to which is registered at H.M. land registry under title No. (my place)

 

 

 

there is also a application for charging order on land or property and a copy of the land registry

 

the loan was for a car that was £3000 ish and i had paid for over a year before getting into trouble.

 

hope this helps in absence of a scanner

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

what appears to have happened is these people have managed to get a ccj against you and have then gone down the road that many dca's are doing now by obtaining a charging order on your property, I notice there is a hearing on the 27th april... YOU MUST Attend if you dont the other side will get exactly what they want by default, if you attend at least you can argue about the amount owed. if in the meantime you have actually finalised the sale of the property before this date and have exchanged contracts, then what will happen is the 6 grand will automatically be given to the courts due to the charging order on the property, your solicitors will be aware of the charge when the house searches were done or are being done

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there's a process for asking for a judgement to be set aside if you didn't know a hearing was taking place. It might be worth ringing the court and asking about this. Also there will be people on here who can tell you whether that's a possibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the problem will be the court will insist that they sent the court papers to you, and as I know to my cost because the same thing happened to me, is that because I only found out about it when charging order came through, the court said they found it strange that I now recieved the mail but didnt earlier, they will not accept it as an excuse unless the papers were actually returned to the court 'with a not at this address'

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers for that, thing is though, on tuesday I have signed somthing from the land registry from my and my ex wifes name over to the buyers name! and the date of the copy the land registry that fr sent is dated 3rd march, and the solicitors havnt said anything to us about there being an interim charging order, the solicitors hve said that it looks like a completion date of next week, so could this affect this do you think?

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it seems it will affect the house sale, I have today recieved a phonecall from our solicitors and we cant exchange contracts because there is an interest on the land registry, so it looks like im up the that creek minus a paddle! god doesnt my life get better by the day. I also found out that first response have recorded a fraud on my credit file because I sold the car to a private buyer even though i bought the car through ebay on a private seller and sold the car and the buyer did a search on it to see if there is any finance owing and it came up clear, and surley if they claim it wasnt mine to sell they can reclaim the car back?

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi no there isnt enough money to pay it off, that is what the solicitor phoned me up for, hes was saying the only £3000 is available to pay them and was asking me to pay the rest to fr to which i said, I havnt got any money, he said he was going to ring up the land registry people to see if it can get lifted but hes not very hopeful of that happening

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

So does anyone know if i can get this order lifted?

Claim Woolwich

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

List of charges received 04/10/06

Claiming £2931.66 inc 8%

PreliminaryLetter sent 05/10/06

31/10/06 Offer of £1000!

LBA sent 07/11/06

 

Claim More Than credit card (Lloyds TSB)

Data protection act letter sent 29/09/06

Another Data protection act letter sent 03/11/06

 

Claim Captital One credit card

Data protection act letter sent 07/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

difficult unless you pay it up, I take it the hearing on the 27th is for the final charging order, if I remember correctly, this can be fought, however, you are going to have to convince the judge that the debt is way out of proportion to the cost of the house, you also say if I read it correct that there will only be 3 grand left and this is not enough to pay off the debt, if so you could also argue that there is no point in the order as there is not enough equity in the property for the dca to recoup there money, in this case, you could see no reason for the charging order to be made final.

If you can afford it though please get some legal advice on this

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the car front, if the car still had finance owing then it actually belongs to the finance company and whoever bought it is gonna be out of pocket as they can and probably will repossess the vehicle as legally it is theirs, dont know why they have put a fraud notice on your credit file as you say you only sold the car on after buying it from a private buyer via ebay, they would have to prove you knew it was in effect stolen, to register against you, and if you have never been charged then I would think they would have no right to register this against you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it the judgement was a forthwidth one it sounds like?

 

I think you need to get an application in for redetermination at the very least. This can be done on an N245 as it is passed 14 days since judgement. What this would do is get the court tio set repayments at a level that you can afford and the DCA then could not get a charging order unless you failed in the court ordered payments.

 

Another option would be to go for set asside. To do this, you would need a reason, and not receiveing court papers is a reason, and the possibility of a defence. This would then allow you to get all of the info needed (credit agreement, default notice, etc.) by CPR from the DCA.

 

 

I'm a little confused about this car, you bought it through EBay yet it was on finance? or did you get a loan for the car?

 

DO you have a copy of your agreement with the fiannce company anywhere?

Do you have a copy of the Default notice they sent?

 

Thanks,

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...