Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your case shows the idiocy of employing a solicitor to do things you could easily do yourself. Had Countryside dealt with their own case they would have entered judgement on 4 June and there would have been no way back for you. But they thought they were clever by running to Rachael and Sean of BW Legal for a more "professional" (aye, right) service.  These dodgy solicitors can only make money on private parking cases by doing everything on the ultra cheap and certainly cant check the judgement date for every single separate case. Ho!  Ho!  Ho! Anyway, glad you got the defence filed OK. The next stage is that the central bulk court will send out a simple form called a Directions Questionnaire to you and to Countrywide which is part of the allocations process to your local court.  If you read this short thread you will see all the stages of the court process  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406892-highview-parking-anpr-pcn-claimform-urban-exchange-manchester-claim-dismissed/#comments
    • It is already trespass, nothing further needed to make out trespass. Not sure where ‘interference with goods’ helps you / how you’d bring a claim for that that stops them parking there.
    • Thanks Dx,    For some further information, the holiday was booked as a package holiday for 2. One of the 2 had to be changed, and changing costs £700 for a new flight as "tickets had been issued and they cant do a name change". I cant quite figure out how compensation works for things when it comes to package holidays.    From what I can tell  - The plane was due to land in Turks and Caicos to drop off passengers, something happened during descent, resulting in technical fault.  - The rest of the original flight from Turks & Caicos -> Montego Bay was cancelled  - A New flight was put on today, which was then delayed by 1.5hrs aswell  - Hotel was provided for the night after much hassle.  - 1.5 days, 2 evenings of holiday lost  If I understand correctly, since the original flight (LHR -> Turks -> Montego Bay) was cancelled, they are both entitled to a refund on that full flight? I can't quite work out if they are only entitled to a refund for the equivalent of Turks -> Montego Bay, or for the full LHR->Turks->Montego Bay, since it was issued as one ticket/all Virgin, and they should have arrived yesterday..?)  I can't work out how to get the cost of that compensation, or whether its a set figure, and how the loss of days of holiday is factored in   I am aware:  If you received less than 14 days’ notice of the cancellation, you are generally due compensation, awarded in pounds or euros depending on where your flight was due to depart from, according to the following scale: £220 / €250 for all flights of 1,500km or less (e.g. Glasgow to Amsterdam); £350 / €400 for all flights between 1,500km and 3,500km (e.g. East Midlands to Marrakech); £520 / €600 for all other flights (e.g. London to New York). Compensation will be reduced by 50% if the arrival time of the replacement flight doesn’t exceed the arrival time of the original flight by: two hours for flights of 1,500km or less; three hours for flights between 1,500km and 3,500km; four hours for all other flights. So I "think" its £520pp for the flight part as compensation (7500km)... but some sites say its a full refund for the flight... is it both?  Thanks,  Ryan  
    • Our business was only transacted digitally as I was not in England at that time.  
    • Funny. But not sure I should ! Wondering if I could place pots and plants - which a) would look nice and b) would it then be trespass and interference of goods?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EQUITA/Council tax Imminent visit please help.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5558 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, this is my first post on this forum, so please bear with me, Last year i made the mistake of missing a months council tax payment, and i was forwarded to equita, in january this year, after reciving a baliff;s removal notice. so i duly went to there office in Birmingham, and arranged a payment plan, of £88 a month, a letter was sent in the post, and a payment book too, i have kept up all my payments, and was shocked to find in my letterbox last friday a "notice of removal" with a rather rudely wrote letter telling me they were going to remove my goods ad chattels, so i phoned the man up, and he said he didnt have my papers, could i phone him on monday (yesterday) so i did, he said he still didnt have my paperwork, so i phoned him today (tuesday) so i spoke to him, and he said that i had to go into the office and speak to the people there, i also phoned there help line (joke) and they said i had missed payments, a the agrement was weekly, put i said i had paid monthly and not in default.

 

i was then subjected to a lecture about paying my council tax on time, and that it was my fault.

 

so i then phoned the baliff back, and he said that he had told me what to do, and that iam an idiot for not doing it, and he will be outside my flat at 7am tomorrow, however iam at work, and wont be there, but my wife will be, ive told her nt to let this man in, and i will be going back to the office tomorrow.

 

is there anything i can do, to get these people of my back?

 

would it help if i go to the council and ask them for help?

 

if my car is on finance can he still take it away?

 

any help pls, my mind is a whirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya, this is my first post, so please be gentle, i missed 2 months council tax last year, and was immediatly reported to Equita, the first i knew about it, was a letter, with huge red letters "notice of removal" on the top, with the standard bumf about a baliff, coming round my flat, and wanting to take my stuff, i phoned the number on the letter and arranged a re payment plan, this has been paid every month on the date stated.

 

however come friday (20th march 09) i had another one of there lovely red letters, so i phoned the baliff, and asked why i had been visited, he said he didnt know, and told me to phone on monday (yesterday) so i did, and was told he didnt have my file, could i phone today, so idid, he said i had to go to the office in birmingham as he didnt know why, so i phoned there help line (joke) and was told that i had broken my argeement, with them, and i had to speak to the baliff, i said i hadnt broke any agreement, but was told that i had to pay 20 pounds a week, and i have been paying 88 pounds every 4 weeks, so in theory i am in front of my payments.

 

i phoned the baliff back, he basically told me i was an idiot, as i should have gone to there office in birmingham, and that he will be coming round at 7 am tomorrow to remove my stuff.

 

can i ask, if he has never been in my flat how can he remove my stuff?

 

if my car is on finance or in a shared car park, can he remove that?

 

what happens if i just tell him to shove off?

 

help please iam at my wits end!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will move your thread.

Merged and re-titled.Please stick to one thread-its in this forum where you are likely to get most advice.Have a read through the stickied guidance here-while waiting.

A shared car park will make no difference-I suggest you move it well away.If theres no WP order been signed and he cant get in by lawful means then they cant take anything.If you can get down to the Council office I would do so and prove them wrong.

Edited by MARTIN3030

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, this is my first post on this forum, so please bear with me, Last year i made the mistake of missing a months council tax payment, and i was forwarded to equita, in january this year, after reciving a baliff;s removal notice. so i duly went to there office in Birmingham, and arranged a payment plan, of £88 a month, a letter was sent in the post, and a payment book too

 

Did you sign anything when you made that agreement with the bailiffs?

 

 

was shocked to find in my letterbox last friday a "notice of removal" with a rather rudely wrote letter telling me they were going to remove my goods ad chattels, so i phoned the man up, and he said he didnt have my papers, could i phone him on monday (yesterday) so i did, he said he still didnt have my paperwork, so i phoned him today (tuesday) so i spoke to him, and he said that i had to go into the office and speak to the people there, i also phoned there help line (joke) and they said i had missed payments, a the agrement was weekly, put i said i had paid monthly and not in default.

 

In my opinion you are being conned.

 

 

i then phoned the baliff back

 

Really! You must stop telephoning people, all they'll give you is bad news.

 

Only write, email from now on.

 

 

he will be outside my flat at 7am tomorrow, however iam at work, and wont be there, but my wife will be, ive told her nt to let this man in

 

Good, good!

 

 

i will be going back to the office tomorrow.

 

 

Nooooooooooooooo!

 

 

is there anything i can do, to get these people of my back?

 

Well lets see, it depends on whether you've signed anything, and whether they have been into your house.

If the answer is no to both they are stuffed.

 

would it help if i go to the council and ask them for help?

 

No they are doing exactly what the council wants them to do.

 

 

if my car is on finance can he still take it away?

 

No, they can only seize the property of the debtor. Although Bailiffs have the right to assume it's your property. I'd park it away from the house anyway, but if they did seize it, they should accept a statutory declaration from you that you don't own it.

If it's on HP, you don't own it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...