Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all,        I really need to start my own thread on this Claim with Overdales/Lowell for a Cap One debt. but have already got to this stage .. My initial question for the moment - until replies come in - is that I figure my main stance is that a purchased debt cannot be claimed, debts can only be claimed by the original issuer of the debt .. but mediation is about coming to an agreement. So would I be acting in bad faith if I enter into mediation yet not seeking to come to a financial agreement? Also, I need to reject the scheduled time slot and ask for another as I'm not going to be free during those hours. The wording of the email gives the impression that I am given this one slot and if I reject it, then I am rejecting mediation - there is no mention of rescheduling, only of freeing up the slot for others .. although, I would have thought it would say so, if there were no possibility to reschedule.. Can I ask for another date without issue?   Anyway, if it's more helpful, I am happy to post up my defence and start a proper thread? I had a lot on at the time and had to do things right away due to the time limits, so didn't feel I had time to come here and go back and forth for info, so put my defence together from reading through relevant threads, late at night. CCA request appears to have been fulfilled (I'm still to check the accuracy of the documents). The other thing, asking solicitors about the particulars of the claim, hasn't .. although I forgot to ask for proof of postage and didn't send recorded post either (whereas the CCA I did), so not sure if I can pursue that easily ..?  
    • Looking for a bit of assistance. I moved into a rented flat on 20th April 2024. I viewed it on the 14th April. Before I moved into the flat, the letting agency provided me with an offer sheet, in said offer sheet I made a number of requests and conditions related to me progressing with assuming the tenancy. These were: 1. A professional clean of the flat prior to move in date. 2. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet be replaced prior to move in date. These were all planned actions by the landlord when I viewed it. I could see the boxes for the hob and other items in the flat. I prepared to move in on the 20th April but none of the work mentioned in the offer sheet had been completed. The standard of the clean was abysmal - mouldy food left in the fridge, nothing wiped down, bathroom mouldy etc. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were also not installed. I decided to not officially move into the flat as it was not in a condition as promised, my partner lives relatively close by so I lived with her initially. It was only on the 24th April that the hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were installed. The cleaners visited again 2 weeks after move in date (3rd April) and attempted another clean of the flat. Again, it was a poor job. I resorted to cleaning the flat myself. I have numerous pictures of the things I identified during my clean and have sent this all to the letting agency. Because of the issues faced, I asked the letting agency that the rent be reduced for the initial month. Exactly halved - to represent the 2 weeks that I was not living at the property. The landlord and letting agency have responded by saying that they will be willing to accept 1 weeks rent as a deduction but not 2. My question is, am I in a strong position to insist on the 2 weeks rent returned or have I been fortunate that they have even offered a weeks rent as a deduction? I would like to insist on the 2 weeks. I have paid the 2 weeks only as my rent collection date passed 2 days ago. Thank you for any assistance. Any further relevant details required let me know and I will provide.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bailiffs- phoenix commercial collections


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5512 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Briefly, on 04/03/09 I had an unexpected home visit from Phoenix- Daniel kendrick and Chris Sharif. They have come to collect a council tax debt. I explained to them that I already have an arrangement with the council to pay £141 each month which I have been paying. I asked them to leave as I was taking my kids to school. Came back home to find an envelope stuffed with a notice before removal and notice of seizure of goods and inventory notes-

Arrears due to authority- £306.50

Levy Charge- £32

Enforcement Fee -£ 255

 

inventory to which this refers- My car on Hire Purchase Agreement

 

I called the Council immediately and demanded some answers as I did not receive any notice from them. The council explained that I was late in paying the installments and I owe £284. I informed the council that I have paid £142 on 02/03/09. The customer advisor checked my records and said I owe £140. I paid this amount immediately and asked her to inform Phoenix. I called Phonix to inform them that I have settled the debt with the council.

On 11/03/09 the bailiffs from Phoenix turned up and blocked my car and demanded £476.50 as enforcement fee. I declined and called the police of an illegal activity taking place in my residence.

The police arrived but said they had no power as these are certificated bailiffs from the court and have powers to seize the car. I demanded to see the authority from the council and the liability order from the courts but they refused. I was left with no choice but to pay £476.50 before they left my driveway to enable me to take my kids to school.

 

I need your advice and a model letter of complaint about bailiffs.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've been well and truly screwed.

 

So to start from the top.

 

Template letters are usually in the wiki.

 

You, by the sound of it have grounds for a complaint against the bailiffs, and a complaint against the Police officers - which you should address to the Chief Constable himself, it's the only way it'll be taken seriously.

That doesn't mean they'll do anything though, but if you don't try you'll never know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I explained to them that I already have an arrangement with the council to pay £141 each month which I have been paying.

 

They were entitled to collect once the council passed the debt to them regardless of the arrangement you had. The council have a contract with them .

 

Came back home to find an envelope stuffed with a notice before removal and notice of seizure of goods and inventory notes-

Arrears due to authority- £306.50

Levy Charge- £32

Enforcement Fee -£ 255

 

inventory to which this refers- My car on Hire Purchase Agreement

 

The bailiffs were entitled to assume that the car was yours and were entitled to seize it. However, once they were informed that it wasn't your property but was in fact the property of the Hire Purchase Company, they should have released it from seizure and amended their records to show no charge.

A statutory declaration should be enough although some insist on the owner making an application to them directly.

 

I called the Council immediately and demanded some answers as I did not receive any notice from them. The council explained that I was late in paying the installments and I owe £284. I informed the council that I have paid £142 on 02/03/09. The customer advisor checked my records and said I owe £140. I paid this amount immediately and asked her to inform Phoenix. I called Phonix to inform them that I have settled the debt with the council.

 

 

It was important at this point to put that in writing, because you have no proof of that phone call, only of making the payment.

At that point the bailiffs felt justified in carrying on because they clearly believed they had lawfully seized your car.

 

 

On 11/03/09 the bailiffs from Phoenix turned up and blocked my car and demanded £476.50 as enforcement fee. I declined and called the police of an illegal activity taking place in my residence.

 

Unless you had provided evidence that the vehicle was NOT your property it's difficult to see how they could have done anything else.

And the Police haven't got a clue - they aren't called wooden tops by their detective colleagues for nothing, who aren't always the sharpest tools in the box themselves. The police, unless you are lucky, will take the line of least resistance and will assume the bailiff is telling them the truth.

 

 

I demanded to see the authority from the council and the liability order from the courts but they refused.

 

That's typical, they probably didn't have it with them anyway.

 

 

I was left with no choice but to pay £476.50 before they left my driveway to enable me to take my kids to school.

 

So let me see, so far you have paid them:

 

Arrears due to authority- £306.50

Levy Charge- £ 32.00

Enforcement Fee - £255.00

Enforcement Fee - £476.50

Which I believe totals = £1070.00 that you have paid on top of the money you owed the council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your quick response. I made an appointment with the council on 11/03/09 afternoon. I had a meeting with an advisor who informed me that the discussions and protest with the customer advisor on the phone had been recorded on my file.

Secondly, she advised me to make a formal complaint to the head of revenue and also a complaint to the the bailiffs company.

Where is wiki- I am a novice to all this

I paid £476.50 to the bailiffs on 11/03/09 and arrears of £140 directly to the council on 04/03/09.

Please help me to recoup this money with interest/compensation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your quick response. I made an appointment with the council on 11/03/09 afternoon. I had a meeting with an advisor who informed me that the discussions and protest with the customer advisor on the phone had been recorded on my file.

 

That sounds like a nice honest person, but be warned they may be in a minority at your council office and if (as happened to me) they changed computer systems and for some reason lose access to those files then you've no proof. What you should do is send a polite letter confirming everything that was said in the telephone conversation and as them to confirm that their records agree with yours.

 

Don't leave it to chance, it cost me nearly £4000 in council tax I shouldn't have had to pay, and still owe today.

 

Secondly, she advised me to make a formal complaint to the head of revenue and also a complaint to the the bailiffs company.

 

I always suggest doing it in this order: written letter to bailiffs, scanned and emailed to them, email copy to council tax dept, head of revenue, your councillor, and your MP.

 

 

Where is wiki- I am a novice to all this

 

Right at the top of the page although it's often worth browsing previous threads because some of the letters are cracking, that's how I did it.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bailiffs-sheriff-officers/120845-rossendales-final-reminder-i.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I paid £476.50 to the bailiffs on 11/03/09 and arrears of £140 directly to the council on 04/03/09.

 

Well the arrears of £140 were owing to the council so thats gone.

 

But the £476.50 (not £1070 :oops: ) is a different matter.

 

 

I would begin at the beginning and complain about the levy upon the HP Car, because that is the foundation on which they built their fees and actions.

 

You should get a statutory declaration witnessed by a solicitor to say that the car does not belong to you, and write to them asking for the return of the money incorrectly levied. They'll refuse of course giving some reason but that's ok, post back when you get that reply.

 

Make sure a copy goes to the council asking them for the money as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have never been in favour of naming a bailiff on an open forum but as this post has had the name on here for over a month I will confirm that if you are considering making a formal Form 4 Compliant to the court about this person then all enquiries need to be made to Redditch County Court and the bailiff is self employed.

 

The fees are NOT RIGHT and the entire responsibility for the fees is with the local authority to sort out. The bailiff is their AGENT and they cannot abdicate responsibility.

 

You are entitled to a large refund....NOW.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...