Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Small boat crossing numbers in last 7 days much more than the planned number to be sent to Rwanda. Small boat arrivals – last 7 days - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK These migrants obviously believe that being sent to Rwanda is not a consideration when they are aware of other migrants having died making the English channel crossing. If Rwanda was going to receive thousands of migrants, then it probably would be a deterrent to some. But the threat of sending 300 migrants to Rwanda is just not going to make any difference.
    • Last June, 3.4m members received a £100 payment from the building society. Now they will be wondering whether the offer will be replicated this year.View the full article
    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

D/judge Made Wrong Decison What Now??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5099 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good luck MDAW

 

I would not get too many new thoughts into your head because as docman said you may not get chance to mention many. Just stay calm and try and get the judge to listen to the points that docman stated above.

 

The actual wording used is very good and very powerful. If by chance you are asked to clarify anything further then that is when you would need any back up information handy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 434
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi MDAW .. I know how apprehensive you must be feeling right now ..its not nice is it?

BUT we are brave and we know we are strong just to have got this far.

 

My advice is ...get everything ready and in order

get your bag ready and get your clothes ready. make sure you know where everything is.

read your notes a couple of times ...practise in your head what you want to say ..tell yourself not to get rattled and remember what Docman advises .

If the DJ buts in just stop and you can apply to the Circuit Judge.

 

You will be fine :)

Edited by summerbreeze
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi westie..

you really are gettin the best help possible now!

 

Very best of luck coming from me and i wish i could go with you tomorrow:( you are rising to the challange with ease and with Dad and Doc behind you your in good hands.

 

I will be waiting for your post tomorrow...GOOD LUCK my friend:D

 

love as always MJ:)

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice is ...get everything ready and in order

get your bag ready and get your clothes ready. make sure you know where everything is.

You will be fine :)

Thanks I forgot the obvious (honest!!!) my poor westie did not get his walk last night either with everything going on in my head right now, will be glad when things get back to normal (if ever!)

 

Thanks for your wishes everyone....I will post late on tomorrow afternoon with how I got on...but of course stay peeled tonight in the meantime to welcome any other comments/information with pleasure.

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

MDAW,

 

Sorry, I had overlooked that you are going to a formal handing down of a judgment. I agree with Docmans approach, particularly:

 

the judge may interrupt at this point and deny you permission to appeal. If he does, do not argue.

 

The only thing I would add is to ask formally for the N460 as this a key document for any appeal. eg:

 

" I would be grateful if I could have the form N460 as soon as possible. I would draw your attention to paragraph 7.6.1 of the civil bench book where it says that an N460 should be handed to the prospective appellant at the end of the hearing."

 

Link here: http://www.jsboard.co.uk/publications/pdfs/7_appeals.pdf

 

HTH

 

Dad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MDAW

Good luck ! Like Gaz i will be thinking of you too :) x

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

MDAW,

 

 

" I would be grateful if I could have the form N460 as soon as possible. I would draw your attention to paragraph 7.6.1 of the civil bench book where it says that an N460 should be handed to the prospective appellant at the end of the hearing."

 

Link here: http://www.jsboard.co.uk/publications/pdfs/7_appeals.pdf

 

HTH

 

Dad

 

took me 10 days to get mine

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well unlucky for me I got the same "FAMILY" Djudge today to hand me down my judgement. From that, it will be no surprise to know that he used his judiciary discretion and refused me permission to appeal.

 

Restons in there delight had attended too. It started with the Judge saying why we were there today & listening to both sides at the court hearing he was handing down his judgement, I had got that copy had I etc etc.

 

Then he went on to the costs that Restons had put forward at that hearing and what figure the judgement would arrive at. I piped up at that point that with regards to the costs (as he was tallying them up) I had tried everything to negotiate with them before all this came to court so if the costs could not be awarded...he went on discussing the fees listed with Restons then to the hourly rates, work involved that were listed.

 

When that moment of silence came I then started my sentence that Docman had suggested in wanting to apply for permission to appeal....(I wasnt interrupted) so made sure I referred to what acts had not been applied to CCA1974 under S61 etc. Failure to comply with the consumer credit (Enforcement,Default & Termination notices) regulations 1983. How no valid Default Notice with the prescribed period allowed to rectify any breach was ever presented accurately and in line with the CCA197. That it was a legal requirement to allow me no less than 14 days from receipt of service to remedy any breach as detailed in schedule 2 of the Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notice) Regulations 1983.

 

I then continued on regarding the Interpretation Act 1978 section 7 Practice Service of Documents and its statement here Tuesday would have been the earliest it could have been served to me had it been 1st class & 2nd class would have been the Thursday ...also if CPR6.26 had been incorrectly applied in this instance? 6.26 makes it 2 Business days & the DN posted on the Friday would have still been the Tuesday NOT the Monday as 6.2b Business day means any day except Sat, Sun a bank hol etc. I was still putting them to strict proof.

 

I then concluded with what DAD had suggested in being grateful if I could have the form N460 etc

 

Restons had been scribbling away during all this but then came in to remind the judge how (cant remember if they said the words contest the appeal) as what outcome had already been decided from the judges points raised had already been based on that information already (or something to that effect!!).

 

Thats when my skeleton bits came in handy as I was then able to point to each of the following.:-

judgement comment no's 15, referring to me receiving a copy of "agreement". I clarified to them what my Amended defence no.21 had stated here & not referred to it as an agreement, it was a "Priority Request Form"

Judgement No. 17 There IS no signature on this priority request form yet it states here it does?

and Judgement 23 does not comply as per Legislation (Consumer credit Act 1974) (stayed clear of the words S78 as Docman said)

AND Judgement no 20/21 The DN DID NOT give me 2 business days, The DN was dated 9Jan (FRI) How can this be delivered on Monday 12th, Monday is not the 2nd buisness day after posting Tuesday would have been.

 

I came across quite calmly but firm to be honest as I wanted to get it all down for the record, so stood my ground.

 

The judge having listened then concluded in his decision he was not going to grant the appeal. I asked could I have the form anyway, he did not have one to hand but he would get one from his usher if I waited outside. What he has put on is hard to decipher though unless your good at joined up reading at its worst!!!

 

The only thing I did get in my favour was having the costs that Restons had summitted almost halfed, however I don’t think quite honestly this was down to me only for the fact the woman from Restons could not clarify fully as to what the costings stated had involved.

 

So that’s my time in court today….falling on this Family Djudge twice now who either hasn’t the knowledge or care to be bothered with it IMO.

 

NEXT..........

Edited by Mydogsawestie

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not consider this a failure. You put your points over calmly but the decision was already made.

 

You managed to put your points across which will no doubt be remembered by the judge although it did not help you today.

 

You did well.

 

Pedross

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unlucky MDAW,

You seemed to be having a dialogue with the deaf.

Was it not possible to ask why he apparently changed his mind and why had it taken so long for the judgement to be delivered.This in itself seems an abuse of process.

Whats next?

Pat

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree with Pedross - you were never going to change the decision, and in particular I dont think asking him why he seemed to have changed his mind in between the previous hearing and handing down the judgement would have profited you much. I mean its hardly likely he is going to admit to a mistake in open court? On the other hand, both these things are ammunition for the appeal.

At least Reston's got their costs well clipped.

So that's you done part 1 - got through today which was never going to go your way. What you need to focus on now is getting the appeal right, which is particularly important as you have a good case.

Keep your chin up! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't know where the whole process of courts is being directed from. an application for SJ should either be either be dismissed or granted without too much deliberation, if it takes someone time outside that allocated on the day then there is clearly a triable issue and should be dismissed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.....It beggars belief in what was my point in saying anything at all ....I missed more things too to be honest like the S69 bit in the POC, I suppose I could have gone on + on + on but like Pedross & SFU said, his mind was already made up!!! Which Restons was well chuffed by.:mad:

 

Next......I would appreciate any next fountains of knowledge to assist me with the appeal procedures.....SFU what you said about Maladministration as Humbleman just pointed out shouldnt this be something to add to the pot too?

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Next......I would appreciate any next fountains of knowledge to assist me with the appeal procedures.....SFU what you said about Maladministration as Humbleman just pointed out shouldnt this be something to add to the pot too?

 

For an appeal you will need the judgment transcript. was he a DJ if so then you make the appeal at the same court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.....It beggars belief in what was my point in saying anything at all ....I missed more things too to be honest like the S69 bit in the POC, I suppose I could have gone on + on + on but like Pedross & SFU said, his mind was already made up!!! Which Restons was well chuffed by.:mad:

 

Next......I would appreciate any next fountains of knowledge to assist me with the appeal procedures.....SFU what you said about Maladministration as Humbleman just pointed out shouldnt this be something to add to the pot too?

 

 

Bad luck MDAW, but don't give up. We all have to stumble before we can learn to walk, and I am sure that you have learned a many a thing during all this. To get justice these days you have to fight, keep a strong mind and be determined and you will get there in the end.

The problem is that we know what we want, it's just finding the right way to get it, and as we are no experts in the areas of laws and are up against these big boys with the gift of the gab leaves us sometimes in quite a difficult position when we are in court.

All is not lost and hopefully someone with more knowledge will pull you out of this hole soon. I am not giving up on my case even though its been going on since time began but I know that I will get there in the end, and I wish you the best and good luck in your battle against these critters:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your kind words Fretful38 & Humbleman, thanks for the links, along with your own link threads I will spend this coming weekend fathoming out my next course of uphill actions!!

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

excuse my thickness, but can someone explain that if the DJ has not given permission to appeal, how comw MDAW can appeal.

Am I missing something?

Pat

 

After the trial judge has refused permission, you are allowed to make a second application for permission to the appeal court, in this case the local circuit judge. This request will first be considered by the judge alone just reading the papers. If permission to appeal is again refused you have a further 7 days to request a hearing, where you can ask for permission to appeal in person. If permission to appeal is refused at this stage its game over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...