Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5536 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi guys. i'm a bit new to all this, so i'll try and give as much info as i can, if any of you can advise me if i've been screwed over here or not that'd be great.

 

i moved house back in november to live with some friends, and had informed the council (by writing) i was now residing with the current address. i thought i was fully paid up with my council tax from the previous property.

 

in january 27th (this year) i had a letter from rossendales demanding £80.30 for unpaid council tax on the previous property (this letter also claimed it was a final notice, despite it being the first i'd heard from either council or rossendales). i wrote to the council asking if this was correct, and was still waiting on a response when i had a second letter on feb 4th again from rossendales telling me there was now a baliff order and they'd attended to seize goods while we were out. i called the baliff's number on the letter (J mcGarry) and explained what was going on and i was awaiting the council's response. i informed him i wasn't trying to get out of paying, if i owed it, i'll pay it. but i wanted to make sure. he seemed disgruntled by this but said he'd call back in a week.

 

on friday i still had no response to my letter to the council so i called them, and found out i did indeed owe the money for the property, and now they've passed it onto the baliff. today the baliff came around and i told him i do owe the money, so fair enough i'll pay the £80. at which point he told me it'd gone up to £274.80. apparently someone had added a baliff charge for almost £200. i told him this was insane, he got very pushy and said i should've paid in the first place. i pointed out to him again what i'd already told him over the phone and then said i'm not disputing i owe it, and i'm willing to pay the £80 here and now. but he was very agressive and then demanded to enter the premises and take goods for the £200, unless i paid him it in cash there and then. when i said i didn't want him doing that he then jacked up the charge to £500 and started to call the police as i was denying him entry.

 

so, at this point i had no idea what was going on, it sounded half like he was trying to con me and half like he was trying to scare me. i managed to talk him back to the £280, and he demanded it cash, and so i had to go to the cashpoint and get it. while he was filling out a receipt for this, i asked him why the baliff charge was so high, and his response was it's a standard charge. now since looking here i see all different mentions of different charges for things, i'm not sure that £200 was a valid amount or was he skimming some extra off the top for himself or the company?

 

the whole thing's just been unreasonable and insane, never once have i said i'm not paying outright, i said from the very beginning with them if i owed it i'll pay it, i just needed to check as i'd had no mention from the council about it. if you guys can advise me on if i've been wronged or if i'm just out an extra £200 now that'd be great. thanks for reading!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again, sorry to bump this, but i'd like a little more advice before going to the police with this. how should i treat it? should i speak to rossendales head office to ask them about the charge first, or would this make my case worse? if it helps anyone i denied him entry to my house, although he make a couple of attempts to step past me, and when i denied him this he made comments about 'would he like to rain on my happy little world and get friends and the police around', this was the point where he got aggressive in tone and started jacking up the fee to £500 and started calling the police.

 

the more i think about it the more it sounds like he was trying to scare me so i wouldn't question his fraud. i have a receipt from a rossendales booklet he filled out that shows i paid £274, and it has his name on it. would this help me out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say you wrote to the LA to notify them about a change in address, do you still have a copy and did they ackowledge receipt of this. I ask because the council should notify you before applying for a liability order and before referring the matter to the bailiffs.

 

As far as I am aware only in unpaid criminal fines can an order be issued to break into a house or in eviction. If you had signed a Walking Possession Order and the bailiffs had been in your property could the bailiffs break into your house (only in the most extreme cases), so Rossendales are overstating thir powers. If a bailiff had called at your house you would have found a letter or similar left at your property to notify you.

 

If as the bailiffs had claimed, they had made 2 visits (which I find very doubtful), the maximum they could charge would be 1st visit fee £24.50 and 2nd visit fee £18.00, a total of £42.50. If they had levied on a vehicle outside your property, a seizure notice should have been posted through the door (although some are sticking the notice on the car or no notice at all - this is an illegal levy). These charges can only be applied if a court certified bailiff is in attendance as only certified bailiffs can act on Council Tax liability orders.

 

The bailiff is guilty of not identifying himself, behaving aggressively, assault by trying to push inside your house, overstating his powers, issuing threats leading you to fear that may come to physical harm and fraud. He was in breach of the guidelines laid out and agreed to by the national body (I will post a link at the bottom). Unfortunately you will find that the police not to be interested in pursuing an action against the bailiff or indeed of even investigating the matter. You have been defrauded but the best way of recovering your monies is by letters of complaint about the behaviour of the bailiff to the council and Rs. First write to Rs and ask for a full breakdown of costs charged to you by the bailiff. If they are not forth coming with this you serve a Standard Access Request (SAR) asking for a screen dump of your account. This may cost you £10 (the maximum that can be asked for). In the meantime tackle the LA overthe way they actioned the liabilty order and the bailiffs without notifying you. Copy in the collections department, the claim department, Rs and your local councillor. Also point out the illegal behaviour of the bailiff in this letter and tell them that they are resposible for his actions and for any overcharge on the fees. The LA may decide to refund all your fees but don't hold your breath.

 

Once you get a reply from Rs, you will have the evidence for taking them to the Couty Court to recover your money, make the LA joint defendants as they are liable as well. You might want to put in a Form 4 complaint aboutthe bailiff but think hard about this as the judges are not patient with those that mess them about.

 

Hope this helps.

 

I was going to include the advice given to officers by Devon & Cornwall Police but it has been removed from the website. If anyone wants it, PM me as I downloaded as a pdf file.

 

Department for Constitutional Affairs - Enforcement - National Standards for Enforcement Agents

Link to post
Share on other sites

awesome, thanks very much for the help, it's given me a lot to go on, i think. and i'm pleased to see i'm not in the wrong for thinking he'd overstepped his boundaries.

 

i've got tomorrow off so i'll be writing to Rossns and to Leicester Council, see what turns up. if i can get the money back then that's a good thing, but mostly i just want to let the baliffs know they can't pull this stuff.

 

i appreciate you guys are here with the help. i'll keep you informed as to how it plays out, see if my case helps anyone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi again guys, just a quick one to update you and get some more advice.

 

i received a letter response from Rs, they gave me the baliff's version of events (which, no suprise here, gave a very different version to what actually happened), as well as a breakdown of the charges. here's what they said it was:

 

council tax owed: £37.80

 

1st visit fee (15th Jan): £24.50

2nd visit fee (21st Jan): £18

Levy Fee (16th Feb): £25.50

Van Attendance (16th Feb): £110

Waiting fee (16th Feb): £60

 

total £274.80

 

now, here's the thing. i only had one visit that he left anything through the door to say he'd been, and that was for the 27th Jan, which was when I called him, not the 15th or the 21st as they claim. it was indeed the 16th of feb when i spoke to him face to face and the events happened.

 

however, they claim in the letter he conducted a levy and added a van charge. can anyone explain what a levy is and the van charge is? he did not enter the property nor seize any goods, does this mean those charges aren't applicable?

 

also, the 'waiting fee' is one that boggles me. i never kept him waiting except when i had to go to a cashpoint to get the payment. but even then, the total of £274.80 (ie, including this mystery waiting fee) was given to me from the start, before he knew i'd have to go to a cashpoint.

 

can anyone advise me if the levy fee, the van attendace and the waiting fee are even applicable to my circumstances? or are they just making up numbers to justify things?

 

any help you can give would be truly, truly appreciated! thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can anyone advise me if the levy fee, the van attendace and the waiting fee are even applicable to my circumstances? or are they just making up numbers to justify things?

 

Generally they are just fantasy charges, added in the hope you won't know any different and will just pay in a panic.

 

See here: The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

 

 

and here: The Council Tax and Non-Domestic Rating (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2006

 

 

If your charges aren't provided for in these acts then they can't be charged.

If there was no levy, then no levy fee can be charged. If there had been a levy there would have been some paperwork through your letterbox telling you about it, and listing the items that had been seized.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A levy is when the bailiff levies on your goods, ie makes a list. You say you never let the bailiff in, do you have a car that the bailiff could have levied on?

 

I would be inclined to write back to the bailiff company by recorded delivery asking what is recorded on the levy. (remember to keep a copy and send a copy to the local authority)

 

BTW I got all my bailiff fees back that they overcharged me, so it can be done :-) it took a bit of time and patience and quite a bit of letter writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope, no car here. i've written a new letter to them asking pretty much this, also questioning the legitimacy of the other fees. hopefully i'll see some reward from this!

 

thanks for the replies, both of you, the help is very much appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BiG SiD

Basically the bailiff can charge a Levy and Van fee in the same visit - though this is unusally and not the norm with most bailiff companies (esp. with domestic arrears - tends to be used on NDR/Rent where the dangers of debtors absconding, going bust etc is higher). Without knowing what has been levied upon and perhaps importantly where it was levied upon - it could be very difficult to sort how the charges have broken down. ie: if the bailiff had attended your previous address (as I'd assume as notified by the council - charges at this address, though perhaps harsh, would stand, unless they credited by goodwill etc). Seems to me, that you need a copy of the inventory - do you have this? It should have been left when the levy of distress was made. If not talk to the company and ask for such a copy - that will show what and where the levy is. If it turns out to be a neighbours car - you will need to chase this up with the bailiff company - though if already paid the money - I'd have thought you'd struggle, as they can simply claim that the levy was made upon assets which were believed to be those of yourself. Get the Inventory - thats your key.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...