Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They didn't turn up because they knew they would lose so they saved the cost of sending a brief saving them a couple of hundred pounds at least. But still a big relief for you now that it's all over . So congratulations plus you can enjoy your trip that much more. 
    • I will try again...................... Even at my age there is quite clearly a PCN envelope by the windscreen wipers on your car on some of the photos.  But as I said in the IPC letter, that is not the dispute. The dispute is that CPM sent you the second PCN on the 28 th day of the issue date of the first PCN. It should not have been sent until the day AFTER the original PCN was issued. Therefore they broke the Act, they breached the IPC Code of Conduct and their agreement with the DVLA. It is something that the IPC cannot ignore since to do so will bring the ICO down on them and the DVLA should ban CPM from getting data from them once they know if the ICO do nothing. The minimum I expect is that your PCN will be cancelled. But it is up to you. I have given you the details, you have copies of both PCNs sent to you on the sar  with all  the relevant dates. 
    • Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card   An HM Armed Forces Veteran Card is a way to prove that you served in the UK armed forces. The card can make it quicker and easier to apply for support as a veteran. It’s free to apply. You can currently only apply for a Veteran Card if you have a UK address. Veterans who do not have a UK address will be able to apply later this year. READ MORE HERE: Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Apply for an armed forces veteran card to prove that you served in the UK armed forces.
    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
    • it doesn't matter what you are being charged or if you missed the discount period. you ain't paying anyway..... if this ever gets before a judge. then the ins and out of POFA2012 or any IPC/BPA guidelines might come into play. until then i go get on with your life. you are spending far too much time on a speculative invoice scan scheme  its almost as if you believe these are fines and enforceable in a criminal court and you could have bailiffs at your door any minute.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old O2 account now with lowells


rb2010
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5553 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi There,

 

Where do i begin?

 

I recently checked my credit file and found that i had a default on an old O2 account. I thought that the account was settled and sent an e-mail to O2 regarding clarification and to ask for the default to be removed. However, upon e-mailing the customer relations woman, she stated that they had a legal right to keep CRA's updated with payment history and then stated there was still a balance on the account. I requested that she send me any information on the account and clarify, as i did not have any paerwork to state that the account was in arrears. The account dated back to 2006.

 

So after some rubbish e-mails back from the complaints woman i had no real outcome or results.

 

However, today i received a lovely letter from lowell portfolio stating that i owed £360 for an O2 account.

 

I will upload the letters if possible. I am totally confused as to where to go from hear and any advice would be much appreciated.

 

Many thanks,

RB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope,

 

That's the thing, i requested that they supply me with all the information regarding the account and remove the default. She replied by saying that because the account was not a credit agreement then they could not issue defaults. I argued that there was a default on the CRA file and that she should send me a copy of the default notice. The complaints woman sent me some more palm off e-mails before i got the letter from lowell. I will try and post my coresspondance as well. I stupidly sent a CCA request originally, when i should have sent a Subject access request. I just can't believe they just sold the supposed debt on, before fulfilling my complaint.

 

So, to answer your question, no they haven't proven the debt is mine. I have until the 25/2 to reply to lowell. or so they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the most recent reply to my complaint. Can i just say that i did make payments to moorcroft and was under the impression the debt was settled. I never ever received e-mails or letters from them. the account was passed to mooorcroft and i made payments because i was constantly harassed by them. If she says moorcroft picked the debt up for repayment, then how can they pass it to lowell?

 

 

Good afternoon Mr Bell

 

Thank you for your email sent on 27 January 2009 about the response you received to your complaint last week.

 

I’m sorry if my response didn’t clearly explain our position.

 

I’m aware that we’ve added a default for non payment to your credit file and my email doesn’t state otherwise. You quoted a requirement under the Consumer Credit Act and my email explained that, as we’re not regulated by this act, we don’t need to issue a notice of default to record defaulted payments with the Credit Reference Agencies. I’m sorry if you misunderstood me.

 

The circumstances surrounding the debt are that, as explained in my earlier email, your number was disconnected on 2 March 2006 due to non payment. As you were within the original contract period, you were charged a termination fee which is line rental up to the end of the 18-month contract you agreed on 11 November 2005. When this amount wasn’t settled in full, we’ve recorded this with the credit reference agencies.

 

You mentioned that you have no recollection of us contacting you about this amount however I can see that we sent emails and wrote to you after the number had been disconnected. You made payments for five months after we issued our final bill which would indicate you were aware of the amount outstanding. For your information the last payment we received was on 18 October 2006 and came via our debt recovery agent, Moorcroft.

 

We have a legal obligation to record the way in which customers make payments and therefore can’t remove entries that are a true reflection of your payment history.

 

I hope I’ve clarified our position further for you.

 

Kind regards

 

Kirsty

 

Kirsty Eatwell Executive Relations

t 0845 3300683

 

O2

www.o2.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this amended to suit :)

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

(Your Name) Print do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to my earlier post......which was a copy of the reply from the O2 complaints dept......

 

 

Is this legal?

 

"I’m aware that we’ve added a default for non payment to your credit file and my email doesn’t state otherwise. You quoted a requirement under the Consumer Credit Act and my email explained that, as we’re not regulated by this act, we don’t need to issue a notice of default to record defaulted payments with the Credit Reference Agencies. I’m sorry if you misunderstood me."

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Don't know if this is of any help but this company was on Watchdog a few weeks ago for sending letters out to people without actually being able to clarify any details etc.

I guess there would be more info on the watchdog website as I dont really remember much sorry.

Settled at 50%

Clydesdale £155. Should have been £310 charges, plus interest :( Husbands Account.

 

 

SETTLED IN FULL:

MBNA £1230. For Hubby.

Halifax £39.

RBS £342. For Hubby.

Cap One £200.

Abbey:

:D Settled in FULL April 18th 2007. £5179.83 Paid but what a long battle!

:D

COMPENSATION OF £100 ON 14/04/08 FOR CONTINUED HARASSEMENT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is NO legal requirement to record defaults with any cra, they do it out of buggerance and to get back at you knowing it lasts for six years.

 

Ask Lowells for proof of any money outstanding, not just O2 says so, but real proof. No proof, no payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Guys, Sent this e-mail to the O2 woman.

 

Dear Ms ,

 

Firstly may i thank you for your speedy reply to my complaint query, however, i would like to express my disatisfaction in your overzealous approach to my complaint. I hope you do not treat all customer complaints with the same approach. As yet you have still not given me any explanation or proof that the balance in question is still owed by myself other than some poor attempts to deny that i have any reason for a query. Instead, what you have done is pass my account to Lowell Portfolio I.

 

Obviously, you may have been expecting an e-mail such as this, since the way you have dealt with my query has been nothing less than underhand and disgraceful. I especially like how at no point in your last e-mail did you happen to mention that my account has been passed on to the previously mentioned company, until the letter from Lowell Portfolio I dropped through the postbox.

 

I would point out that I have no knowledge of any further debt being owed to O2, as looking at my records after making payments to Moorcroft, i was told by them that the account had been settled.This may explain the reason why the account had not been pursued by yourselves since 2006, until i queried the default on my credit file, of course.

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it is unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

I look forward to your reply in writing.

Yours faithfully

Edited by rb2010
Link to post
Share on other sites

Also sent the template letter to lowells, but just got this e-mail back from O2 today.

 

Hello Mr Bell

 

I have asked that you’re not contacted by Lowell’s until we’ve investigated this further. I’m sorry that you weren’t aware we’d passed the debt to them.

 

You’ve mentioned you were advised by Moorcroft Debt Recovery Ltd that the payments you’d made were sufficient to settle the account. While I make further enquiries can you please establish if you have any correspondence from them confirming this as we have nothing to suggest this is the case, hence the default some time later.

 

I’m sorry you’re unhappy with the way I’ve responded to your complaint. My decision was based on the information available to me but I’m happy to review this given your recent update.

 

I’ll contact you once I’ve clarified things further. If you need to speak to me please don’t hesitate to call me on the number below.

 

Kind regards

 

So, where do i go from here? When i originally contacted O2, i questioned the fact that the account had been settled, but it was ignored until i included the template letter in the complaint.

I have had a look for some correspondance, but can't find anything to say the account has been settled, so what do i do now?

Thanks

RB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey There,

Just received this e-mail from 02 regarding my debt. they explain that i am liable, however they have never pursued me since October 2006, the only reason they have started pursuing me is because i queried a default notice on my credit file.

can anyone give me advice on what to do? This debt is purely due to a termination fee, the debt is not for any outstanding call charges etc.

the reply is as follows:

Good afternoon Mr Bell

 

Thank you for your recent emails. As promised last week, I’ve made further enquiries into your claims that you had no knowledge of the outstanding debt and that you were advised by Moorcroft that the debt was settled in full.

 

For ease of reference I’ve responded to your points below, as laid out in your email dated 19 February 2009:

 

· You state that you have not received any explanation as to how the balance is owed. Please refer to my email of 26 January 2009 which states that “I’ve checked the account history and I can see that your number was disconnected on 2 March 2006 due to non-payment. As you were within the original contract period, you were charged a termination fee which is line rental up to the end of the 18 months. When this amount wasn’t settled in full, we’ve recorded this with the credit reference agencies.” My email of 5 February 2009 states that “The circumstances surrounding the debt are that, as explained in my earlier email, your number was disconnected on 2 March 2006 due to non payment. As you were within the original contract period, you were charged a termination fee which is line rental up to the end of the 18-month contract you agreed on 11 November 2005. When this amount wasn’t settled in full, we’ve recorded this with the credit reference agencies” I also explained that “You mentioned that you have no recollection of us contacting you about this amount however I can see that we sent emails and wrote to you after the number had been disconnected. You made payments for five months after we issued our final bill which would indicate you were aware of the amount outstanding. For your information the last payment we received was on 18 October 2006 and came via our debt recovery agent, Moorcroft.”

 

· I’m sorry I didn’t point out that the debt had been assigned to Lowell’s. We’re permitted to reassign debt if we’re unable to recover monies from our customers.

 

· I’ve contacted Moorcroft Debt Recovery Ltd who have confirmed that they didn’t issue confirmation of full and final settlement. Their records show that their account was closed and passed back to us as uncollectable.

 

· As there is no question over the fact that you are the debtor associated with this account we’re not acting unfairly.

 

· You are not a third party; you are the account holder, so for us or our associated agents to pursue you isn’t unfair. Since you contacted me regarding the correspondence you received from Lowell’s, their action has been placed on hold so I do not agree that we are using deceptive or unfair methods.

 

· We do not believe our demands for payment to be unjustified and have provided detailed explanations as to how and why the balance is due. Therefore, I do not agree that our actions amount to harassment.

 

· I temporarily suspended debt recovery activity with Lowell’s whilst I was in contact with Moorcroft Debt Recovery Ltd. However, as we have provided evidence that you are liable the suspension will be lifted and Lowell’s will continue in their attempts to recover monies from you.

 

I’m sorry that this isn’t the outcome you were hoping for but I trust that I’ve clarified our position further.

 

Kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...