Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Probably to do with the Creditor accepting the reduced payments claim as part of the IVA. - Thats my guess anyway.  As for the mount outstanding... 60k is incredible and im pretty sure a DRO wouldnt cover that much even after the new legislation.    For you @Alfy - Please stay headstrong and stop worrying. My viewpoint on debt with debt collectors is simple. You are a figure on a spreadsheet loaded into a database for them to run a collection cycle through.  They dont care about emotions or your situation, they just care about paying off their shareholders and trying to turn a profit.  They use varying tactics to increase the pressure on you to the point where you will break. People then fall for this an either cave in to DCAs before doing their own due diligence on the debts that are purchased or turn to IVAs like you have.    They are better ways to handle this and Im glad you feel better after a good nights sleep - I hope you can keep it up. 
    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MINT is cca enforcable?


r&b
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5387 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all. Attached are the various documents sent in reply to a cca request on 29/12/08. Can anyone tell me if this is enforcable as I already have a ccj against me with this (before I knew abt cca issues) and they are now (court date 24th Feb) attempting to get a charging order on my property (there are 2 already). If its enforcable obviously I cant do much if not how do I go about defending the charging order (is this even possible)? Many thanks for any help.

RBS.ADVANTA.GREEN&CO cca reply.jpg

RBS.ADVANTA.GREEN&CO cca reply2.jpg

RBS.ADVANTA.GREEN&CO cca reply3.jpg

RBS.ADVANTA.GREEN&CO cca reply4.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

try this

src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt231/robntanya/RBSADVANTAGREENCOccareply-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket">

src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt231/robntanya/RBSADVANTAGREENCOccareply2.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket">

src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt231/robntanya/RBSADVANTAGREENCOccareply4.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket">

src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt231/robntanya/RBSADVANTAGREENCOccareply3.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket">

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks supasnooper... can i go for a set aside at the charging order hearing or is that diff matter altogether and if so do i simply defend the charging order? indeed can i defend the charging order on these grounds? also i note your points but how would i defend it in legalese to a judge such that he/she will find in my favour? appreciate the help..

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry for the delay in getting back to you, I didn't spot this earlier.

 

May I ask, did you admit the debt when you were issued with the CCJ papers ?

 

It may be a bit tricky to apply for a set aside if you did.

 

However, moving on.

You'll need to apply for a set aside seperately to the Charging Order.

 

If you make the application immediately , you may get the Set Aside hearing and Charging Order hearings combined............perhaps, but if you don't try, the answer's already a no.

 

A set aside will cost £75 and needs to be done on a form N244.

 

The reasons for a set aside - you didn't know your rights at the time, no information supplied by the claimant with the N1 form, unenforceable CCA and you found CAG (Don't put down the last one) !

 

Don't get too stressed out about the legalise, you are a Litigant In Person, and as such, a judge should allow you certain latitude in your approach to this.

 

 

Moving on, to set aside a CCJ have a look at this thread from post #66 -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/168328-some-advice-re-interim-4.html

 

 

I've attached a form N244 below.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

supasnooper ur a star many thanks..yes i did admit it under advice from CCCS ..i presume this will be brought up by the judge ... does the law take precedence over any admission on my part?

Edited by r&b
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately letting CCCS handle this has got you the CCJ. Although they can be helpful, they really work for the creditors.

 

You will have to state to the judge that you were ill-advised by CCCS, and looking into the matter further, you found better advice from another source and would wish to set aside the CCJ as you are now fully aware of your legal rights.

 

Get the application to set aside the CCJ done and submitted as soon as possible or a judge may not consider the application. It will cost £75 to make the application.

 

Have a search for form EX160 if you think you maybe exempt from court fees.

 

Good Luck.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks supa...i ll get the forms sorted soon as...i wont be exempt...any advice was welcome at the time, shame i didnt find this site first. you live n learn i guess. going back to the reasons for the set aside,could you just expand on the reasoning i would use. you stated the TnC s and the link with 2006 charges, which i didnt quite get..also i guess i need to get this to my local court, will i need to send a letter explaining my intended actions or simply phone the court to get it moved and then get the forms in to my local ?...many thanks

Edited by r&b
Link to post
Share on other sites

any ideas as to the action to get the case moved ? phone call or letter of explanation and do i conatct GREEN & CO to let them know as well? should i send them a SAR or any other letters to help my case in teh future? many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok letter to get the case moved to my local court will go monday...then as soon as i get confirmation through I will put the N244 in to my local court....does the main form p.2 of the copies with the signature on it, not seem to be an application form? am i right in thinking therefore that this is not an agreement at all? should I send any request, as in SAR to Green & Co or anyone else to see what they might have?

many thanks

Edited by r&b
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, firstly get an appeal together for the Interim Charging Order, use the points raised here National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 15 Charging Orders In The County Court

 

This needs to be signed and received by the court by Tuesday (and copy to Greens, don't send them anything else and do NOT sign this copy).

 

Also get your request off to get this moved to your local court as you've stated as you are a Litigant In Person.

 

Nest, If you wish to apply for a set aside then complete the n244 and get it into the court ASAP, do NOT wait for any correspondence or anything else !

If you are lucky, the courts may tie the set aside and the Interim Charging Order hearings together.

 

A subject Access request to RBS\Mint would be useful as it will or should disclose what documentation they hold i.e CCA and Default Notice.

 

Also it will provide details of any penalty charges you may want to reclaim if you don't get the CCJ set aside.

 

 

My reference to 2006 refers to when the default charges were reduced to £12.00 as stated on the T&C's they have sent. These T&C's were not relevant in 2001 /2002 when you first got the credit card.

 

As you have spotted, p2 of the bumpf they've provided you with may meet s78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 but does not meet with s61 as there is no interest rate shown, no repayment details present and no reference to a credit limit.

 

Have a read of these threads to understand CCA's (courtesy of 42man & steven4064 respectively ) -

 

Is My Agreement Enforceable - Useful

 

Consumer Credit Agreements

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks supa......

sorry if im gonna drive u mad here but want to get this rite..

 

"Ok, firstly get an appeal together for the Interim Charging Order, use the points raised here National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 15 Charging Orders In The County Court

 

This needs to be signed and received by the court by Tuesday (and copy to Greens, don't send them anything else and do NOT sign this copy)."

 

what do u mean by get together an appeal, in what format? do i treat the charging order as a separate issue for court purposes i.e can i use the argument that my house now does not have enough equity to cover any charging orders, that i have several other debtors,etc (although 3 charging orders in total already, further reducing any equity available) or do i have to formulate something that i can use later on? are there any forms that need to go in (and to greens) or am i simply getting together a defense?

 

"Also get your request off to get this moved to your local court as you've stated as you are a Litigant In Person.

 

Nest, If you wish to apply for a set aside then complete the n244 and get it into the court ASAP, do NOT wait for any correspondence or anything else !"

 

do i send all this to my local court with a covering letter perhaps explaining the movement request or to the original CC for them to send on?

 

"My reference to 2006 refers to when the default charges were reduced to £12.00 as stated on the T&C's they have sent. These T&C's were not relevant in 2001 /2002 when you first got the credit card."

 

gotcha...makes sense when u know wot ur talking about...cant wait for that bit myself seems long way off at the mom....lol

 

really appreciate your help here

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR going tomorrow gteed del to RBS head office. any ideas on my above points as i d like to get this done today and sent tomorrow to beat the tuesday deadline (is this to comply with court timing)?

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

should the appeal be in the form of a letter setting out the issues with the original CCJ and CCA or should i submit a court form of some description?

Link to post
Share on other sites

trying to sort out the N244 as well any help here especially with parts 3 and 10 would be appreciated....still unsure about the appeal mentioned in no.14 by SUPA....need to get this done if its to be with them tom....

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok for the N244:

self explanatory up to part 3 for which i have put:

"set aside on the grounds of poor initial advice, not knowing my rights at the time, no information supplied by the claimant with the N1 form and an unenforceable consumer credit agreement."

thanks for the help previously Supa and if you re looking in what was the N1 form on which im relying in this part?

i ve looked through but found no relevent substitutions i could use for part 10 of the form for the evidence. clearly i ve got what they sent me as a CCA but what else do i need here ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

.... sorry guys need advice on this appeal of charging order any help pls...

Edited by r&b
Link to post
Share on other sites

any help there pls....im constructing smth myself but help wud be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok this is wot im sending to telford and greens by gteed del...

 

claim no xxxxx

dear sir,

i write regarding the interim charging order under the above claim number to be held on 24th Feb 2009.

As a litigant in person I am writing to appeal against this order on two counts: firstly that with the recent collapse in house prices, it is very doubtful indeed that there will be any further equity should the house be sold, once the two mortgages are paid, notwithstanding two further charging orders. Secondly, I intend to pursue a set aside of the original CCJ, to which this charging order pertains.

I trust these reasons are sufficient to grant my request.

 

 

any thoughts though this is goin soon.....

also any ideas with regard to the N244 queries above as I need to get that in too...

many thanks

Edited by r&b
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

rite sent that letter gteed next day, signed for, etc, etc to telford cc and green & co...hope that covers whats reqd..... as well as SAR to RBS...

thanks martin for the reply.... is STAT DEMAND about bankruptcy or have i read that wrong? ive not had one of those but have a current CCJ that i want to set aside and a CHARGING ORDER hearing on 24th feb which is wot that letter of appeal was about....can i use those arguments for the CCJ set aside?could still do with specific help on filling in the N244 for the set aside if poss....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...