Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 2 foot of sea level rise   The Thwaites Glacier — dubbed the “Doomsday” glacier because of the grave impacts for global sea level rise if it melts — is breaking down “much faster” than expected, according to a peer-reviewed study published on Monday in the academic journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using satellite imagery, scientists determined that widespread contact between the glacier and warm ocean water is speeding up the melting process. The climate crisis is interrupting natural processes across large parts of the continent, according to the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. The glacier, roughly the size of the United Kingdom, could cause global sea levels to rise more than two feet if it melts completely, according to the study. “Thwaites is the most unstable place in the Antarctic and contains the equivalent of 60 centimeters of sea level rise,” study co-author Christine Dow said in a statement. “The worry is that we are underestimating the speed that the glacier is changing, which would be devastating for coastal communities around the world,” she continued. Read the full story here.       or here ... from the India civil service currents affairs exam Doomsday glacier Antarctica‘s Thwaites Glacier, roughly the size of Britain, is a fast-moving glacier in West Antarctica. Because of the risk it faces — and poses — Thwaites is often called the Doomsday Glacier. Because of its size (1.9 lakh square km), it contains enough water to raise the sea level by more than half a metre. Thwaites’s melting already contributes 4% to global sea level rise each year. Thwaites are important for Antarctica as it slows the ice behind it from freely flowing into the ocean. Credits: BBC Vigorous melting Salty and relatively warm ocean water is infiltrating beneath Thwaites Glacier, leading to significantly speedy melting. This process, termed as “vigorous melting“, is eroding its stability. However, its potential collapse could lead to a staggering 10-foot rise in sea levels, posing a dire threat to coastal communities worldwide. Previous studies discovered a deep connection to the east through which deep water flows from Pine Island Bay. That study also attributed the melting to the heat transport caused by channels bringing warm water towards the glacier from the north. With melting, glaciers become light and float off the land where they used to be situated. The resulting retreating grounding line exposes more of a glacier’s base to seawater, increasing the risk of melting. Since the late 1990s, the glacier has seen a 14km retreat of its “grounding line.” The grounding line is the point where the ice flowing off the land and along the seabed floats up to form a huge platform.   https://www.pmfias.com/current-affairs-for-upsc-civil-services-exam-may-28-2024/   or here Satellite data reveals Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is melting faster than we thought | Space WWW.SPACE.COM Seawater rushing miles beneath the glacier makes the ice more vulnerable to melting.  
    • I have notified all parties and will start a new thread.
    • The messaging app's boss has taken to social media to deny Mr Musk's claim it "exports user data."View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help required please - deposit dispute


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5590 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, first post, so be gentle with me :)

 

My girlfriend and I have just moved out of the flat we have been renting for the last 6 months or so. Today, I received a call from the agents saying that they are withholding the deposit due to 'a mark on the carpet'.

 

We have not caused this mark, we are sure of that, however the photos we took when viewing the property do not include the area in question.

 

On pressing the agents, they said the mark was 'a lighter area, like someone had spilt something and cleaned the area'.

 

I stated that we had not caused the mark, and that I would like to arrange a meeting to discuss the issue, at the flat, so that we could view the mark.

 

I have a few questions that I would be grateful for answers to.

 

If the mark is indeed 'lighter' I think it is possible that a previous tenant has just got this bit of carpet much cleaner than the rest - is this reasonable?

 

My girlfriend took the keys in to the agents when we moved out, because they wanted to show someone round, we had moved out, and were unable to attend. When she took the keys in in she was asked to return our copy of the inventory, which she unfortunately did. This means that due to their request, I have no copy of the invetory as it was signed when we moved in - is this fair?

 

They have not mentioned what sort of figure they intend to finally withhold yet, what would be reasonable?

 

If they were to clean the rest of the carpet, to match the 'clean' mark, I suspect it would cost around £50. The carpet would then be cleaner than when we moved in!

 

When I visit the flat, I plan to compare the 'mark' with some carpet that was under the bed, or in the built in wardrobes etc, and therefore, one could reasonably assume, un used and clean. If the two areas are the same, would I be reasonable in objecting to their claim?

 

Everyone expects a carpet to get darker due to wear and tear (without cleaning), how do i stand when 'wear and tear' has been due to actually cleaning the carpet?!

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks,

 

Luke

Link to post
Share on other sites

Initially you have to decide whether the principle and hassle is worth it.

 

For something like this they really should indicate how much they expect it to cost rather than withholding the whole deposit. They should be looking to refund immediately the bulk of the deposit while holding back sufficient (no more than 50-60 quid I'd have thought) to cover the possible cost.

 

Check your deposit is protected and make it clear that you intend to raise a dispute.

 

Point out you have comprehensive photos. You don't have to be clear that you don't think the carpet was photographed :)

 

What did the inventory say about the carpet?

 

Really, they have to prove the condition of the carpet from the inventory, so hopefully not having a copy won't be important.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply,

 

The deposit is protected by TDSL. I can't remember what the invetory said, but am concerned that 'carpet clean' or 'carpet not marked' might appear on it between now and me seeing it again!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I know you dont have acopy, but the LA need not know that at the moment. I would definatly questioned why they wanted your copy. Seems to me that they might have mislaid theirs or that they wanted to compare.

Please note, my advice is only my opinion.

If you have found my advice helpful, please tip my scales, thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...