Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it a voluntary arrangement, you cant simply stop paying and IGNORE everyone. block and bounce all their email addresses. do not reply! there nothing really legal they can do at all. sorry but you've been had blind from day one. its a real shame you didnt come here when the debts started going legal, you wouldn't have CCJ's at all as i bet all your debts are Credit cards loans etc - all simple consumer credit. and i bet you've not had any bailiffs but powerless DCA claiming to be a bailiff (as they do!) . a bailiff is sent by a court not a DCA. incidentally, even if they were court sent bailiffs,  there not right of forced entry on CCJ debts anyway.... see if you meet the DRO criteria if not just ignore them and stop paying. you can deal with your creditors directly with help from us not thru a IVA.
    • No need to post photos and no need to add names of people you have had dealings with. Just provide a short summary of what problem you are facing and a chronological list of what has happened until now. 
    • If that is the first final notice you have received you can probably expect two or thee more to follow. This to test your resolve. They are hoping that these frightening 😃 letters will scare you into paying. After the third or fourth final demand they then have to decide  whether to actually proceed with a court claim or forget about you for a while. You were not the driver, their PCN is non compliant .No biggy.Slam dunk win for you.
    • This journo thinks Trump wants a Mafia state. I wonder if his supporters really want him to be immune if he orders a political assassination? The surest sign yet that Donald Trump wants to run the US like the mafia INEWS.CO.UK The Trumps want to make sure nothing like the rule of law stops them  
    • Yes. I'd be very interested to know how the defendant fared in putting forward the defence that the calaimant had been contributorily negligent by not keeping their cat under control. I'm aware that some people might find that fatuous, distracting or confusing, but the reality is that I'm not aware of any law that imposes a duty upon cat owners to keep their pets under control.  Whereas I believe the law does hold dog owners responsible for their dogs in public places. I'm not certain it was at all beneficial to the OP to suggest that blaming the claimant was a credible defence...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AMEX Letter Before Proceedings


wilko1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5466 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I CCA'd RMA about a month ago and haven't heard anything untill today. They sent me a letter saying as I was such a good customer if I phoned them I would be entitled to a special settlement offer.

 

Wonder what's going on. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I've received a letter before proceedings letter from Westminster Solicitors on behalf of AM EX. Previously I'd already informed AM EX that I lived in rented accomodation and was unemployed. After 3 mths they haven't complied with my CCA request either. Surely they can't seriously be taking me to court, this has got to be just another threatening letter, right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send this recorded to them

 

Dear Sirs,

 

I write in response to your letter dated XXXXX

 

Your letter is incorrect and frivolous, you are fully aware of legally valid reasons why no payment has been made on this account, namely that the agreement which underpins this account has not been supplied despite a perfectly valid request and furthermore, it is suggested that notwithstanding the failure to supply a copy, the agreement itself is improperly executed, devoid of all prescribed terms and deficient in respect of detail relating to APR, total charge for credit and statements of rights ,remedies and protections as required by schedules 1,2 and 6 Consumer Credit Agreements Regulations 1983

 

Therefore the agreement as outlined in section 65 (1) Consumer Credit Act must be laid before the court to be granted an enforcement order before any further action can be taken

 

It is my view that the court would not grant such an order due to the deficiencies that I have outlined within the agreement, further more this has already been raised with American Express yet I note the absence of any documents disproving my points speaks volumes

 

Therefore, I would indeed welcome the opportunity to place this before the court. furthermore should you proceed with the threats to issue a statutory demand I will make an immediate application to have it set aside for the grounds outlined above, also I shall refer the judge to this letter when the matter of costs falls due

 

I trust this outlines my position clearly enough for you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A while ago Link Financial were throwing default notices about like confetti, I received one dated 26/9/08, I was asked to pay up by 10/10/08, is that 14 or 15 days? I read somewhere that you should add on 2 days for postage time. I'm asking is it valid or not taking the dates into account. I received it 6/10/08 but there were no date marks on the envelope.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not 100% sure, but from what I have read, you have to have 14 days clear notice (they should allow 2 days for postage). So, really, you should have been given until 12/10/08. It's also very strange that you only received it on the 6/10/08.....

 

Sorry I can't be of more help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

oh had a few of them,,,,,dont prepare tea and cake he will let you down;)

 

 

perhaps they mean will be telephoning instead,,,laters angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I've got a DN dated 9/6/06, it only allows 10 days to pay the arrears, I read somewhere that the time allowed used to be 7 days, in June '06 would it be 7 or 14 days?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cerberus, can you point me in the direction of relevant case law or similar re. the amount payable on account termination with ineffective DN?

 

Thanks. :)

Advice & opinions given by spartathisis are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a link to the rules here:-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/191754-arrow-global-ignm-1st-4.html#post2144512

 

In terms of the DN - yours was under the old rules...

 

The Rule was 7 days after the date of service. They need to prove how it was served

 

If it was sent by first class post then service is the second day after posting - so service would be the 11th. The seven days would begin on the 12th and expire on the 18th.

 

If it was sent by second class post then service would take place 4 days after posting - so service on the 13th, effective from the 14th and expiring on the 20th.

 

If the DN was posted by second class post it would be invalid - you don't happen to have the envelope it came in do you?

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget that they have to prove how it was posted

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post the DN itself - what is it for - does it contain account charges

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

AMEX DN 1 picture by keithw44 - Photobucket

 

AMEX DN 2 picture by keithw44 - Photobucket

 

2 pages of the DN hope I have uploaded them correctly. It's an AMEX credit card, I haven't received any statements since May '06, since then the Balance has gone up by £800, it has been with RMA, UCA, Westminsters and now Newman and Co

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...