Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • look on the bright side - it would allow Biden to do what he likes ...
    • Few tweaks as the run order was completely messed up and the main point of your defence (reconstituted agreement) pushed to the bottom of the statement.   I, XXXXXX, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows; I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in this claim and further to my set aside application dated 1 November 2022. 1.The claimants witness statement confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the drafts in person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act. 2.  I understand that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income as confirmed in the claimants witness statement exhibit by way of the Deed of Assignment. 3. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights.  This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information).  The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party. 4.  I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 5. The alleged letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address.  I have attached a copy of my tenancy agreement which is marked ‘Appendix 1’ and shows I was residing at a difference address as of 11 December 2018 and was therefore not at the service address at the time the proceedings were served.  I have also attached an email from my solicitors to the Claimants solicitors dated 14 July 2022 which was sent to them requesting that they disclose the trace of evidence they utilised prior to issuing the proceedings against me.  This is marked ‘Appendix 2’. The claimants solicitors did not provide me with these documents. 6. Under The Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims 2017 a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior to and including ,The Pre action Protocol letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claim form dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 7. Upon the discovery of the Judgement debt, I made immediate contact with the Court and the Claimant Solicitors, putting them on notice that I was making investigations in relation to the Judgement debt as it was not familiar to me.  I asked them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.   The correspondence to the Claimant Solicitor's is attached and marked ‘Appendix 3’ 8. On (insert date) I successfully made application to set a side the judgment. The claim proceeded to allocation, 9. The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2 February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None of these documents were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. (insert date you did receive the documents) I then sent a Data Subject Access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided. Details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 4’and the copies of correspondence between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 5’. Remove irrelevant 10.The claimant relies upon and has exhibited a reconstituted version of the alleged agreement. It is again denied that I have ever entered into an agreement with Barclaycard on or around 2000.  It is admitted that I did hold other credit agreements with other creditors and as such should this be a debt that was assigned to Barclaycard from another brand therefore the reconstituted agreement disclosed is invalid being pre April 2007 and not legally enforceable pursuant to HHJ Judge Waksman in Carey v HSBC 2009 EWHC3417.  Details of this are attached and marked ‘Appendix 6’. The original credit agreement must be provided along with any reconstituted version on a modified credit agreement and must contain the names and address of debtor and creditor, agreement number and cancelation clause. 11. Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to disclose a true executed legible agreement on which its claim relies upon and not mislead the court. 12. It is denied I have ever received a default Notice pursuant to sec 87(1) CCA1974.The claimant is put to strict proof to evidence from the original creditors internal document software the trigger of said notice.  13.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. 14. Until such time the claimant can comply and disclose a true executed copy of the original assigned agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim they are not entitled while the default continues, to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. Signed                 ………………………………………………….. Name                  XXXX Date                     30 April 2024   Run 3 copies Court /Claimants Sol/File
    • As one of you mentioned above I've been in a mess for nearly 20 years now and I'm ready to sort my credit report out now - the main reason I got into second round of debt is my kids being unwell and the state considering them not unwell enough for extra help so despite my son being in hospital for 3 months in one year we got extra zero help and I eventually lost my job and got into debt to just so I can be تا my sons hospital bed at his time of need - my life basically fell apart and all these debts got me again 
    • Gosh mate I've woke up this morning with half the worry I had last night when going to sleep!.  I can't believe how much this forum has helped me over the years and I don't  have the words to explain the gratitude I feel towards you guys -  Now that I've slept on it I feel ready to reject this company and my plan is to make them an offer to accept payments to date as full and final settlement - I will I think write them a letter once my review is completed or maybe just send it now whilst they are reviewing explaining my kids are unwell for which reason I'm struggling to survive and if I can politely request for them to accept payment to date as a full and final - I'll mention I don't have any cash or anyone to borrow from to offer a full or even part amount of the remaining balance of the iva and therfore am unable to make a offer of payment.   If they agree to at least even put my offer to the creditors then I feel it's better I hang in there and that way I won't have to deal with any possibilities of more defaults and ccjs    Right now the only adverse effects on my credit report are the iva that is now 3 years old and 2 Ccj one coming of this July and one thus October.    But I am worried new action will begin and new defaults and Ccj may start to appear because I've paying into an agreement im under the impression the 6 year rules starts again so yes I have lost of mixed feelings about this but I'm not going to lie you guys have put some life back into my breath this week as for the last 3 years I've felt caged like an animal and this morning I feel freer I can't explain how much but certainly my soul feel lighter today thanks to yin because I'm now viewing this review totally different to I do yesterday thanks to you guys 
    • Court name UNKNOWN Case number ********** Amount N/A Confirmed by Insolvency Service Date issued May 2021 Type Voluntary Arrangement Notes If you have questions about voluntary arrangements you should speak to the Insolvency Service.     I started this in 2021. So it's been about 3 years I've been paying. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Black Horse Hire Purchase Agreement - Car Taken **please Help**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5509 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In November 2007, i purchased a vehicle from a motor dealer and the finance was arranged through Black Horse Finance. The car was always kept clean and insured. All the payments were going out on time. In October 2008, a friend of mine had borrowed the car and for some reason was stopped by the police and the car was compounded. I went to collect the vehicle from the compound and was told that Black Horse had refused to release the car to me. I contacted Black Horse and was told the their Fraud Investigator that the vehicle had been taken as there was no insurance on it and I had leased it out to a car hire company. All this was untrue as the car was comprehensively insured and I have never leased it to anybody. Black Horse failed to give me a clear reason and the car was sold. I purchased the car for £14,500 and the total finance package came to £19,000. Black Horse sold the car for £5000. I have made a complaint and they have sent me a statement of my account showing that I still owe £10,000. They claim that the reason my agreement was terminated was because I had broken the Terms & Conditions of the contract. It does say in the contract that if the vehicle is seized by any authority, Black Horse MAY terminate the agreement. The police have never confirmed to me why the car was taken and it was them who had informed Black Horse. Furhter to this, Black Horse are asking me to pay £500 for reposession fees. These fees were for them instructing a collection agent to recover the vehicle. I went to collect the car from the compound the day after it was taken but Black Horse refused to release it hence the car stayed in incurring more daily charges. My complaint is still ongoing but I don't think they are listaning to me. Are they allowed to do this ?? I still maintained my monthly payments after the car was taken but I am now expected to pay £10,000 for a car i do not have. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE SOMEBODY HELP ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may need lagal advise on this, suggest you get a solicitor to at least review the contract and the circumstnces of its siezure and return to the finance company. they are the legal owners.

If the person you loaned the car to was not insured they can impound it.

Finance companies only usually take it back on non-payment so they must have a good reason in this case and then they need a court order if you have paid over one third of the agreement costs.

For their claim for the outstanding costs and in court they will have explian the reasons why they did what they did and that they acted in a justifiable and reasonable way.

Get a full explaination from them in writing as to the events and why they acted in the way they did and record that you dispute their actions being justified; to get it all on record when they start chasing you for the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You Raydetinu,

 

I know that the person who was driving the car when it was taken was definitely insured as he had taken out his own insurance policy on the car. I would never allow for anybody to drive my car without insurance. I have tried contacting the Police regarding this but the officer concerned is never available when i call nor does he return my calls.

 

I have tried looking for a solicitor who specializes in HP agreements locally, but they are asking for £100 per consultation. I am a bit hesitant as i do not want to pay so much money only to be told to contact the police and finance company.

 

Black Horse have contradicted what they haave said in their response. The fraud investigator wrote to me informing that the agreement was terminated as the car had been leased to a hire comaony but when i made a complaint, i received a letter from Black Horse stating that the car had been taken as it was not insured. I know it was insured !.

 

This is so frustrating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You now need to collect all the information that you can relating to the siezure; police report detailing the circumstances as to why it was stopped in the first place the officers reports giving the name of the driver; then proof by certificate that he was in fact insured ( not all are on the database hence some are seized incorrectly ); copies of all your payments to prove up to date; request proof from them about it being leased to hire company, or if you can prove it was not; petrol receipts on your card; neighbours that it was on your road drive during that period; anything that you can through at them to counter their claims really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

530man

 

you need to get all the info off of black horse

i think a sar is in order on this one

 

if what you say is correct, black horse have terminated the agreement unlawfully

you are entitled to get back every penny you have paid them and no default

 

but get the sar in to find out what is going on

Link to post
Share on other sites

530man

 

you need to get all the info off of black horse

i think a Subject Access Request is in order on this one

 

if what you say is correct, black horse have terminated the agreement unlawfully

you are entitled to get back every penny you have paid them and no default

 

but get the sar in to find out what is going on

 

How do i get the Subject Access Request ? Do i just write them a letter requesting this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Data Protection Act 1998

 

Subject Access Request

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

Please supply me with all data that you hold on me. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, the following:-

 

1. The original signed, executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

3. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with ORIGINAL CREDITOR.

4. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

5. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

6. Details of any collection charges added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

7. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

8. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

9. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

10. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

print but don't sign your name

 

enclose a 10 pound postel order and send recorded delievery

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I wrote to the Police asking for all the information as to why the vehicle was initially stopped and then seized. The investigating office has responded by telling me that the vehicle was initiall stopped 'Under the powers of The Road Traffic Act 1988' and then seized as the Police Officer was not satisfied that the driver was insured to drive the vehicle. The officer claims that he spoke to me at the time, on my mobile, and I allegedly confirmed to him that the driver was my cousin and i had 'hired' the vehicle to him !! That is a complete lie. I have never spoken to the Police Officer. I know the car was insured, as the driver was issued a HORT1 (producer) and he produced proof of insurance within 7 days. I have written back to the police asking them to double check which number their officer called as i can guarantee it wasn't mine and also what proof they have got that the vehicle was being used for hire seeing as they told Black Horse this which is why Black Horse refused to let the vehicle be released to me.

 

I am now awaiting the outcome

 

I have requested the SAR from Black Horse and am also awating this

Link to post
Share on other sites

530man, sorry to hear of your hassles with BH, trust me there not great at customer service at present, infact defaulting me when i was a day late on payments....thats a different story..

right

The police can stop any vehicle without any valid reason under then law you mentioned. The police officer at the time of stopping the car could have easily rang the insurance company to confirm if the car was insured or not. Did the police officer respond in writing or was it by phone? if it was by phone ask for a written confirmation of the actions he alledgedly performed.

 

You could also, whilst its still fresh, get your friend to write a statement of the events that happened that day. its best to do it now rather then 6 months down the line when you need one. Keep a diary yourself of everything, include copies of all letters sent/recieved.

 

Good Luck

Halifax Bank - Owed £1599

23/3 - Data Protection Act sent

24/5 - Data Protection Act finally arrived

25/5 - Demand for repayment sent

04/10 Court bundle filed with court and Halifax

29/10 STAY ISSUED

JAN 08 - Currently being harrased by debt collectors!

Mar 08 - New DCA - Stopped in there tracks

Jun 08 - And another

Jul 08 - Complaint made to HBOS

Nov 08 - My accounts been sold to a DCA

Jan 09 - New complaint issued against HBOS

Mar 09 - Halifax re-aquired the debt

Apr 09 - Applying for Hardship.

 

at least they removed 2 defaults in selling accounts! :D

 

I dont not claim to know everything and any advice i give should be treated as MY opinion.

 

If ive been helpful tip the scales!

or better still

DONATE TO CAG - every tenner helps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
530man

 

you need to get all the info off of black horse

i think a sar is in order on this one

 

if what you say is correct, black horse have terminated the agreement unlawfully

you are entitled to get back every penny you have paid them and no default

 

but get the sar in to find out what is going on

 

I have received the SAR from Black Horse. Amongst the paperwork, there is a fax from the police to Black Horse Finance informing them that the car was being used for hire and was uninsured to do so but there is no evidence of this. The police have confirmed that the vehicle was insured at the time for me & my wife to drive it. I raised this with the police but the officer was reluctant to go into details. I am currently considering reporting this to the IPCC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...